Thursday, 18 June 2015

Yellen softer, Yellen slower



"That "longer term" is MUCH lower than anywhere historically. It leaves me with the one question, over and over again. Why the hysteria? So what if the inflation rate is at two percent and rates find a new trajectory to 3.75 percent? And the rate hike is going to be slower, we have always said that would happen. You cannot go from 0 to 4 percent in 16 meetings, two years out. So I am guessing that we may see 0.25 percent, then another 45 day hold, then the meeting after that, and so on. The Fed funds rate is out of your control, yet somehow it seems like the one and only story."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Stocks locally were in catch up mode, settling the gains from the previous international sessions. Industrials ruled the roost, the commodity stocks were sold off. In particular iron ore prices dived, impacting on Kumba specifically and Anglo American. I have read and seen that Kumba could, if iron ore prices settle at the long term average of around 40 Dollars a ton (they would have to fall by another one-third) call their dividend into question. Those of you who know and have been following the business that is two-thirds owned by Anglo, will know that in the past, Kumba used to be an excellent dividend payer. One of the best around. Unfortunately they do not control the iron ore price, that is controlled globally as a function of demand and supply, specifically in new steel manufacture. Where is Imperial Crown Trading now? Remember that, claiming prospecting rights on existing production at Sishen. Well, at least the law prevailed in the end.

Over the seas and far away, it was all about what the Fed did and said. Here is the statement: June 17, 2015. Moderate growth, jobs gains steady, inflation is low, it appears like Goldilocks really. We often suggest that in this rates hike we are going to see something that suggests lower than the previous highs. Meaning that the longer term high end, where rates finally settle will be lower than people predicted in the past. I saw this graphic yesterday on the telly, from Bloomberg:



Those are the shapes that I saw, lastly it flattens out to a UFO. There are 17 people who are asked where they think that rates can end up. Then, yesterday, the Economic Projections of Federal Reserve Board Members and Federal Reserve Bank Presidents, June 2015, had a similar projection. The shapes change, scarecrow is now an insect, the front end projections have flattened out to a box.



What is important to see is the "longer run" projections which are, in the opinion of the board members and presidents, around 3.5 to 3.75 percent. And that is against the historical rates cycle of this, from trading economics, United States Fed Funds Rate 1971-2015. I wrote on the chart and drew a line to see where it will end up.



That "longer term" is MUCH lower than anywhere historically. It leaves me with the one question, over and over again. Why the hysteria? So what if the inflation rate is at two percent and rates find a new trajectory to 3.75 percent? And the rate hike is going to be slower, we have always said that would happen. You cannot go from 0 to 4 percent in 16 meetings, two years out. So I am guessing that we may see 0.25 percent, then another 45 day hold, then the meeting after that, and so on. The Fed funds rate is out of your control, yet somehow it seems like the one and only story. I have better use of my time, you should also focus your attention on matters more interesting, like reading about your favourite companies. By the end of the session, the S&P 500 had gained 0.2 percent, in a session that had fluctuated between down one third of a percent and up half a percent, at various points.

Another Fed meeting done, another wait. If one always waited for the next data point before making an investment, you would probably never invest a cent. True story.




Thanks for your feedback on the JSE, first listings and founding date. Ironically with all my blasting of the folks in the mother city, it took a superior googler to find the information, who happened to live in Cape Town. Friendly banter, you know. According to this page on SA History: The Johannesburg Stock Exchange is established, the official founding date of the JSE is 8 November 1887. Sauer and Commissioner streets was where the "tent" was. There is more however, Wiki says that it was on the corner of Commissioner and Simmonds Streets, where London Businessman Benjamin Minors Woollan set up the Johannesburg Exchange & Chambers Company.

Commissioner street is (according the same Wiki) where Anton Rupert started his very first business, the Voorbrand Tobacco Company. It is also where the first ever movie was shown in South Africa, May 1896. A chap by the name of Carl Hertz brought the moving pictures here, on a boat. He was apparently a famous magician that appeared in front of the House of Commons to show that his trick of making birds disappear, did not actually harm the birds. Politicians, making society safer for birds since 1921. On that very corner now is the most magnificent building, corner Commissioner and Simmonds, called the National Bank Building. Stunning. Diagonally opposite is Clegg House, built in 1935 and covered in pink paint as a sign of neglect from a protest, from a Colombian/American artists of the name Yazmany Arboleda. Opposite Clegg House is a Gauteng provincial building and the corner diagonally opposite to that is the Gauteng Social development building.

The second JSE is actually where a Post Office sorting office is now, methinks, Main, Fox and Pixley ka Isaka Seme Street, formerly Sauer. For those of you who don't know, Pixley ka Isaka Seme was the first black lawyer in South Africa and founder and president of the African National Congress. He studied in the US and in the UK, at Oxford. I wonder why he does not appear as much in our early history as he should? I mean, he is the founder of the ruling party. So there you go, some more on the history of the JSE, our old pal from Canada piped in with some juicy bits, any one fancy some translation:

"SAB listed first in London in 1895 and then in Johannesburg in 1897. I am not sure why, except that Sammy Marks' partner, one Mr Lewis, lived in England and maybe there were more investors there than in JHB to take up the stock. Not so long ago a treasure trove of Sammy Marks' letters were found walled in, in the Sammy Marks' House in Pretoria, but I think they are still untranslated from their original Russian. There used to be a Sammy Marks archive at the University of Cape Town, but I don't know if it still exists. Nobody today seems interested in those pioneer ZAR industrial entrepreneurs, who established the alcohol, cement & explosive industries before the Boer War."

Nice, keep it coming.




Company corner

Naspers released a trading update as the market gong rang. I mean, as the electronic bell rang. The last trade in the spot market crossed the ticker, that sort of thing. We do not have a closing bell in the literal sense, the time just gives up the ghost on the spot market. Here goes the trading statement, which can be found on the SENS link on the Naspers website:

We expect core headline earnings per share to be between 25% (2 726 cents) and 30% (2 835 cents) higher than the comparable period's 2 181 cents.

So, by that measure core headline earnings per share puts the company's valuation, as per their share price (1832.69 ZAR) at 64 times. Of course this argument of how to value Naspers has been going on for an absolute age, they often trade as a proxy for Tencent, which trades on a 47 times multiple. At the first quarter reporting period, Tencent was able to grow earnings year on year at 22 percent, you could still argue that the PE unwind (the share price growing into the earnings) is possibly not what the market would like. Like Oliver Twist and his porridge, the market always wants more. Porridge is apparently being generous, the kids back then had to eat gruel, more drinking than eating.

The trading statement continues:

It is expected that earnings per share for the year ended 31 March 2015, will be between 135% (3 422 cents) and 145% (3 567 cents) higher compared to the prior period's 1 456 cents, mainly as a consequence of gains recognised by our associates on the sale and remeasurement to fair value of investments. These gains have been excluded from both core headline earnings and headline earnings per share.

Nice. The results are on the 29th of June, I am actually peeved that I am going to miss those. Ah well, you can't win them all. The market has responded in a sort of favourable fashion to these results, even though it looks a little like a marginal miss on earnings. Year to date the stock is up 20 percent, from the recent highs in April, the stock is down nearly 7 percent. Over the last five years the stock is up a whopping 548 percent.




Stat of the day

When you think of the futures markets, you think of furious contractual prices in almost anything that has excessive gearing and high risk. According to Wiki however, the sixth king of Babylon, a fellow by the name of Hammurabi is the origin of futures. In fact, there is a law code called the Code of Hammurabi. It is well preserved and dates all the way back to 1754 BC, that is around 3771 years ago. Ancient Mesopotamia, which lay on the fertile Euphrates river valley. The code itself is visible on a stone, beautifully preserved and coincidentally (as we spoke about the place yesterday) is visible at the Louvre, in Paris. The saying, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth comes from this code law.

Law 104 (there are many) when translated to English from the Akkadian language (many middle eastern languages came from here) says the following: "If a merchant gives an agent corn, wool, oil, or any other goods to transport, the agent shall give a receipt for the amount, and compensate the merchant therefor. Then he shall obtain a receipt from the merchant for the money that he gives the merchant." Today of course the contracts are very important in all commodities, for farmers to be able to lock in their price before they had delivered their crop. Equally for the buyer to know what their inout costs were likely to be in the finished product. The first major modern day futures exchange is the Dojima Rice Exchange in Osaka. Sadly it was disbanded just before the Second World War. The largest is still in Chicago, the Merc as it is known. Not the German car. The founding date of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) is in 1898, AFTER the JSE was founded. Put that in your proverbial pipe and smoke it.




Linkfest, lap it up

Looking at adverts from the past gives some insight as to how society operated and how people viewed things - How Apple and IBM Marketed the First Personal Computers. I think we have shared this video before, it shows teens watching a 90's advert for the internet - Teen React to 90's Internet. Given how easy and common place internet connection is, it is hard to imagine life without instant information and cat videos.

I know many bookworms who have said they will never use a Kindle but after they did they won't go back to ordinary books - Amazon announces new Kindle Paperwhite with a high-resolution screen.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Greece, oh yes, we forgot to talk about that. Who knows where that will end up, equally, who knows what the interest rates trajectory is likely to be in the US and what that means for exchange rates globally. For now our equities market is marginally higher.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Beer and Cement



"What is the oldest listed company here in South Africa, on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange? PPC was founded in 1892 and listed in 1910. SABMiller was founded in 1895 and listed earlier than PPC, in 1897. Naspers is 100 years old (and completely different from what it was back then), yet it has only been listed since 1994. Anglo American was founded in 1917, when was the company actually listed however?"




To market to market to buy a fat pig. We skipped yesterday to celebrate a day that is very important in the history of South Africa. It is amazing to think that someone born in 1976 would have already finished school and graduated, yet the right to vote after the Soweto uprising of 1976 only saw freedom for those folks in 1994. The wheel turns, it takes a long, long time for that to happen I guess. I personally had the most amazing day, the weather was unbelievable. Accuweather says this morning that the real feel is around minus two, the wind is the real factor here. Thanks frontal systems, remember your geography well at all? Geography was always my easiest subject, easy to understand possibly as a result of being able to see it all the time, like property. Unlike finance. Even though you can live your investments, eat the food the companies that you own manufacture, buying them from retailers you own.

Monday we slid into the close, lower and lower on the day and finishing at the worst point. We ended a percent worse for wear. We should get a lift here today, the S&P 500 is up around 20 points from where our markets closed Monday, although we are about the same levels as we were Friday. Sometimes I wonder what would happen if you went and did five years of humanitarian work and came back to your investments, what they would look like.

Buffett coined the phrase that his favourite holding period was forever, is that still possible? Some of the oldest companies in the world are family owned affairs in Japan, a hotel that has been going for 1300 odd years should make for a fun stay, a construction company named Kongo Gumi is around 1400 years and some change old. Wow. So I guess it is possible, however I read a Seekingalpha article that said that the average lifespan of a company in 1935 was 90 years, today it is just 18 years. Read: Increasing Churn Rate In The S&P 500: What's The Lifespan Of Your Stock?

So whilst your intention may be to hold companies on a forever basis, unfortunately a company needs to evolve. DuPont is a decent example of a business that evolves and keeps up with the times. Teflon, neoprene and lycra, they developed them. The business is however only 213 years old, they did start out as an explosives manufacturer. In South Africa we have some pretty old businesses, Blaawklippen (1682) with Groot Constantia (1685) and Boschendal (1685) vie for the oldest wine farms in the country. This is where it gets very blurry, why is there a complete lack of African businesses history? There must be loads of trading before that, is it documented? I am looking for good literature on the expansion of our continent, I am pretty sure that it does not always make for comfortable reading. Yes, I am sure of it. The book I just started reading is the Elon Musk book, it is certainly a page turner Kindle clicker.

What is the oldest listed company here in South Africa, on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange? PPC was founded in 1892 and listed in 1910. SABMiller was founded in 1895 and listed earlier than PPC, in 1897. Naspers is 100 years old (and completely different from what it was back then), yet it has only been listed since 1994. Anglo American was founded in 1917, when was the company actually listed however? Old Mutual was demutualised in 1999 and listed in that year, yet they trace their history back to 1845. The JSE only started operating in 1887, so I am guessing that SABMiller may well be the winner on that score.

Wait, then I remembered that I should check back, check a company that is a shadow of its former self, DRDGold. Durban Roodepoort Deep, less than 1 billion market cap. Founded and listed in the same year, 1895, the history of the company is not immediately available on their website, I am relying on information from Sharedata. That seems pretty old by Joburg standards, perhaps that is the real winner of the oldest prize, if not most successful. Our city itself was founded in 1886, our city that is. Hey, Cape Town, you had such a lengthy start on us up here (330 odd years), why no stock market of your own?

On that score, before we wrap the markets, I saw a depressing tweet from Joe Weisenthal, or the Stalwart as he is known on Twitter. He has of course sent 219 thousand tweets. There are bound to be some depressing ones. His retweet originated from Terryanne Chebet, an ex CNBC Africa staffer, she now works for a Kenyan TV channel. It is simple, it is an excerpt from the FT, an article from a Nairobi based staffer titled: Nestle cuts Africa workforce as middle class growth disappoints. The regional chief is quoted as saying that the middle class in that part of the world was overestimated by the company, they thought this would be the next Asia. Worse yet, he suggested that it is not really growing, the middle class that is. Although our old pal from Nairobi (regular on CNBC Africa's East Africa programming), Aly-Khan Satchu suggested the products were all wrong for the market, perhaps like SABMiller the company should evolve with the populous in terms of product. So perhaps it is a case of having to be different.




The Greek issues still knock around, the Greek leader was defiant in parliament, I get the sense that a soft default is going to happen and that everyone seems to be thinking that is alright. You must remember that whilst Greece has favourable terms for their long term debt, around 9 percent of all of it (approx. 27 billion Dollars) is due this year. More than half of that amount is Short-Term Treasury bills. There is a very detailed description by the WSJ, world class: Greece's Debt Due: What Greece Owes When. Sigh.

The other important event today is the Fed meeting. Some are suggesting that this meeting will reveal little, or a lot. If it reveals nothing, we are kind of in another period of waiting until 29 July, the FOMC holds meetings every 45 days. And various voting members are talking all of the time. And rates will go up. And no, you must not panic, rates go up and down regularly, this period that we have been through was simply extraordinary and unprecedented, in terms of central banking. That is of course why we do not have a reference point, and too many people are suggesting what could possibly happen next. Keep calm, carry on, stay invested in quality. Rates, you have NO control over that. Expectations are for rates to be on hold until September, a quarterly GDP outlook will also be released.




Stat of the day

Vincent van Gogh never sold a painting in his lifetime is what I heard on the wireless last week, or was it Monday? He died at the tender(ish) age of 37, only painting in the last decade of his life. He created over 2000 works in that time. His most famous piece, The Starry Night has been a permanent fixture at MOMA in New York since 1941. I saw it once, pretty impressive, I am an art heathen however. Of the rank at sale (most expensive at the time) van Gogh paintings own 4 of the 8 spots, number 1. Meaning that when the painting was sold, it was the most expensive ever at that point in time. Two portraits (Joseph Roulin and Dr. Gachet), Vase with Fifteen Sunflowers and Irises were those record setters.

The most visited art museum in the world is the Louvre in Paris, over 9.33 million people visit each and every year. I went once as a ten year old. It was marginally interesting for a ten year old! How much would you say that all of the artworks in Louvre would fetch, should someone want to buy it? 35 thousand art works, 380 thousand objects. Who knows, the Mona Lisa (which resides in the Louvre) is apparently insured for around 750 million Dollars, or it was thought it could be insured for that amount. All 77 by 53 centimetres of it, a pretty small painting. 6 million people see the painting each and every year. So in theory, the painting is never going to be sold, it is behind a glass casing and seems hard to get to, it will be guarded heavily.

The Mona Lisa was bought, it is said, by King Francis I of France, early on, inside of the lifetime of Leonardo da Vinci. Francis bought it for a princely sum of nearly 14 kilograms of gold, 4000 gold florins. That is only around 530 thousand Dollars, which makes the painting and the purchase of the Mona Lisa, possibly one of the best investments for France of all time. France gets nearly 85 million tourists a year, more than any other country in the world, more than Germany and the United Kingdom put together. Astonishing. Well done Francis the first, your legacy may well be that people spend thousands of Euros a year to catch a glimpse of a painting that you once hung in your bathroom. A 6 day 60 museum pass (which includes the Louvre) of Paris costs 69 Euros. A selfie stick costs 30 Dollars. Combine the two, with the Mona Lisa in the background? Priceless for you, not so much for anyone else.




Linkfest, lap it up

I remember seeing this functionality in the Amazon phone which was a bit of a failure - What it's like to use Amazon's ambitious new device invented to take over online grocery shopping. This is making shopping "online" and at home even easier and because the prices are competitive I can see more people doing this. Given the trend for professionals to work longer hours, we have less time to drive to the shop, fill a cart, pay for it and then drive home. Ordering online sounds much better and if you know the quality that you will receive, even better.

This is an interesting view considering that Blankfein graduated from Harvard and even more telling is that his three children also graduated from Harvard - Goldman's Blankfein on Skipping School Work, Wishing to be Chinese. I think the key point he was trying to get across was this "You have to know the content of your field, but you also have to be a complete person, the kind of person that other people want to deal with"

Another case where politicians are more concerned with own bank accounts instead of the people who elected them - Nigeria's legislators will get $43 million of taxpayers' money for a wardrobe allowance. Can the argument be made that you get what you vote for? Or is it more of a case of not being able to vote for quality leadership? President Buhari has only recently been sworn in, so lets see what he can do with his tenure.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets are half a percent better. As ever, there is something to wait for, even the wildly wild Donald Trump. That is nothing short of hilarious and fits squarely into the self importance category.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Monday, 15 June 2015

Rich rich people

"Total global assets were 263 trillion Dollars by the middle of last year. And the growth for the year was 20 trillion Dollars, i.e. from the middle of 2013 to the middle of 2014. North America owns 34.7 percent of total wealth, Europe owns roughly 32 percent."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Short weeks are a drain on productivity, I seriously think that the powers that be should stick all public holidays on Mondays or Fridays. It makes for better planning and is better for the economy, we need not forget the important dates in our history, we must just be more practical about it. For instance, make this date (tomorrow) the third Monday in June. That way we can always remember Youth Day and the uprisings of many of the students of Soweto on that fateful day in 1976. You can read about it, lest we ever forget how horrible apartheid was and how the after effects still live with us today. We seriously need to work harder to upskill ourselves and continue to improve, we should always be demanding better and strive for better.

Locally on Friday markets closed marginally lower, financials the laggards, whilst resources tried their best to see the markets higher, alas. It had been however, a week of improving prospects, this after a number of weeks of selling. In fact, since the markets made their highs in late April, the going has been tough. Of course there have been the obvious issues impacting on markets, the biggest of them all is as to when the US Fed will raise rates. That seems to be the all important matter that is capturing the attention of the markets across the globe. Since December the 16th of 2008, where the Fed set their target rate to be between 0 and 0.25 percent, there have been no moves on interest rates. Of course the market moves interest rates all of the time, since that time the bond markets have tried to predict where rates are going to next.

Right now the effective Fed funds rate is 0.13 percent. The 10 year "constant maturities" treasury rate is 2.39 percent. Two weeks ago it was 2.19 percent, that is a sizeable move in just a couple of weeks. The market always second guesses what the Fed funds rates is likely to be, it is important. Do people spend too much time anxiously awaiting indications or information from the Fed as to when they will raise rates? There have been many false starts in the recovery and fixed income markets have long been in a state of wondering as to when the Fed will raise rates. We have gone from a time of worrying about the size and scale of the extraordinary bond purchase programs (Quantitative Easing) to a time of when will that program end, to where we presently are, when will the Fed raise rates?

Again, as we have said over and over again, the Fed watches the incoming data and collects their own data, they will raise rates when they feel that they have to. Remembering that their mandate differs from ours (The South African Reserve Bank), ours is inflation targeting, their mandate is growth and price stability. Which means that they are flexible. There are times when it pays to have a more flexible mandate, there are other times when it most certainly does not. I suspect that if you have the ammunition, then good and well, use it. Here we are held sway by external currency moves that are far beyond our control, the central bank governor, Lesetja Kganyago, is always at pains to articulate this to the market. He is of course right, the currency will be battered and improve as a function of global forces.

The next Federal Reserve meeting of the FOMC (the Federal Open Market Committee) will be Tuesday and Wednesday this week. I often used to refer to the Fed blankey, we all need assurances about what someone in a position of authority seems to think is going to happen next. Our views have absolutely no bearing on where rates will go next. So whilst it is worth getting excited about (like most of the rest of the Market), one should just watch and accept that rates cycles turn both ways eventually.

The other secondary matter that is certainly closer to conclusion are the talks between the rest of Europe and Greece, with regards to meeting closer in the middle and accepting some sort of conditions. There was a total of 45 minutes talks last evening, before they "broke down" again. Sigh. Some Eurozone official was quoted as saying that he thought Greece wanted these talks to go nowhere. So it remains the same, the stock market in Athens is around 7 percent down. Sigh. I am there next Thursday, I shall scope it out for you fellows. I can't imagine that the default route is smart, I do however get the sense that the rest of the EU has bailout fatigue. We shall see.




We do not live in the Sudan (even if we entertain their leaders, at your expense I might add), we do not live in North Korea, or many other pariah states for that matter. Although strictly speaking, we would not have entertained president for life Omar Hassan al-Bashir if we thought that Sudan was a pariah state, you get my drift? The courts are testing the process as we speak, who knows, perhaps the field marshall (colonel at the time of the coup that he assumed power) will be arrested. He is the only head of state wanted by the International Criminal Court. Period.

Where is this going? The truth is, we may live in a state which sometimes gets us down, there are however many choices for individuals, including investment choices. You have choices, unlike many of those other places. You have choices to invest abroad, you have choices to invest in businesses that do more businesses with more customers offshore. Stop thinking that you are confined to one geography. I tear my hair out when I hear chattering classes suggest that companies looking for offshore investments are somehow unpatriotic. The world does not end at the Beit Bridge, Pafuri, at Alexander Bay, Nakop, or Komatipoort (Lebombo), nor does it end at Kosi Bay.

No, there are many more countries and another 7.25 billion other customers and people to trade with. If local companies want to search for and more importantly, execute on international expansion plans, then I am all for it. After all, I consider myself a citizen of Earth. Until we start trading with unknowns elsewhere, we should encourage trade everywhere across the planet. And the same should count for your investments too. Think global, another terrible side effect of apartheid was insular thinking by local citizens.




Stat of the day

How rich is the world? I mean, what are the collective assets of the world? I suppose that it is not a definitive number, Credit Suisse however released a report titled: Global Wealth Report 2014, which estimated that total assets were 263 trillion Dollars by the middle of last year. And the growth for the year was 20 trillion Dollars, i.e. from the middle of 2013 to the middle of 2014. North America owns 34.7 percent of total wealth, Europe owns roughly 32 percent. I am afraid to say that total wealth on this continent (Africa) is just over one percent of global wealth. True story, check Table 1 from the publication:



Wealth per adult on the African continent is just over 5000 Dollars each, the global average, which is skewed by North America (340 thousand Dollars) and Europe (146 thousand Dollars) is 56 thousand Dollars. I am pretty sure that as a result of the Chinese stock market surge, this would look very different over the last 6 months. There are stories appearing of small scale traders making "lots of money" all over the show. I have seen pictures of people selling bananas with trading screens. There are 200 million brokerage accounts in China. What interests me the most is that in the year 2000, Japanese millionaires (Dollars) accounted for 75 percent of all Dollar based millionaires in the region (Asia), that has since fallen to 40 percent, with most of the growth from China and Australia.

Two more graphs. Firstly the global wealth pyramid, which layers what the percentage of the wealth of the world.



What does that tell us? It tells us that 0.7 percent of the total population have total assets of 115.9 trillion Dollars, or 44 percent of the global assets. That is an eye opening amount. Those are all the people with assets of more than 1 million Dollars, of which there are very few. The next "bracket" on the pyramid is a more chunky 7.9 percent of the global population owning 108.6 trillion Dollars, or 41.3 percent. That is the bracket of 100 thousand Dollars to 1 million Dollars. There are very few people that own 85 percent of the global wealth, to fit into that bracket you have to own more than 100 thousand Dollars. Figure 2 however confirms what all of the above tells you, most of the really wealthy people are in Europe and the US, we said that already. Check:



There really is no conclusion, this is just an indication of rich people across the globe still live in the developed world, where rule of law and infrastructure is tops. The fact is however that it continues to evolve and quite quickly, there are richer and richer people. Although in the back of assets in excess of 50 million Dollars, there are only 128,200 individuals, it is estimated. Does that sound about right to you?




Linkfest, lap it up

Subscription only, still if you have any free articles left from your FT reading, then check this one out: Renewable power will overtake coal if climate pledges are kept. Wow, by 2030 coal will be smaller than all alternatives. The best of the alternatives? Is it solar? Elon Musk seems to think so, he is quoted as saying: "The sun shows up every day and produces ridiculous amounts of power." That is funny and true at the same time.

Quartz had an interesting interactive graphic, that is pretty self explanatory: Africa's neither 'rising' nor 'falling' but it is growing-fast. What I find quite hard to stomach is that there are various other bodies, like the EU that funds the AU, I am glad to see that the AU has a plan to change that.

Zimbabwe have finally retired the Zimbabwean Dollar, at least the old one that is. Chinese news site Xinhua reports: Zimbabwe set to end use of defunct currency in Sept. As the BusinessInsider reports "Zimbabwe is paying its citizens $5 for 175,000,000,000,000,000 Zimbabwe dollars." I guess what happens when you do not respect money supply. It is strange to accept that the same politicians who destroyed the economy still preside over it.

Remember that rover landing on a comet? It is awake. It woke up as it got closer to the sun after being dormant for a while, all of seven months. It even tweeted a hello -> Hello @ESA_Rosetta! I'm awake! How long have I been asleep? #Lifeonacomet. Amazing how a seven month sleep is jolted awake with a battery recharge. Fits in nicely with the Elon Musk observation above.

The biggest opening weekend for any film was set this weekend. Jurassic World grossed more than 500 million Dollars globally, the movie itself cost around 150 million Dollars to make. See the WSJ article: 'Jurassic World' Stomps Its Way to Global Box-Office Record. Currently on IMDB, nearly 62 thousand folks give the film an average of 7.7 out of 10. The director is a young (38 year old) chap, Colin Trevorrow, could this be his Jaws moment? The first Jaws movie was directed by Steven Spielberg, before Colin Trevorrow was born, total budget back then was 9 million Dollars, grossing 470 million (1975) Dollars. Jaws is according to Rotten Tomatoes (a review website), the best movie Spielberg ever made. It also kept you from swimming.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. We are flat here today, whilst our market may be tired and waiting for futures closeout later this week, the two issues continue to plague global markets are front and centre.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Friday, 12 June 2015

Doggone! Dick gone.



"Twitter's subscriber growth has slowed, the company recorded subscriber growth of 18 percent in the first quarter of the year, on the conference call Costolo indicated that April had been slow. Meaning that subscriber growth had slowed further. I think the problem that new Twitter followers have is that they do not understand what it is useful for."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. The Greek talks have made zero progress. In fact I get the sense that the grandstanding era and importance that the whole Eurozone placed on the area that contributes 1.8 percent to total GDP is waning somewhat. The leader of Syriza is losing friends back home, being too friendly it seems for their liking, more importantly losing friends in Brussels. Those are the people with the money however. It is OK to stand there and suggest that one should do X or Y, in reality however you have to be nicer to the people who are there to effectively keep you solvent.

I am still of the opinion that the Greek ordinary peoples opinion matter just as much as politicians, whenever your hand is incredibly weak, you can only bluff so much before someone actually calls your bluff. Athens has been told, go back and come back with a better set of proposals before you get any more money. This seems like the toughest stance that the EU has taken towards the beleaguered country in the last half a decade. I think that it is a case of enough is enough. Hey, I am there in a couple of weeks time. I will ask ordinary people in Athens what they think about all of this, I guess a generalised question, a real question nonetheless. And tell me what you want, that part is important.

The Fed last night releases a quarterly Financial Accounts of the United States, or a Z.1 release, it is the health of the US economy. Household wealth in the US grew to 84.925 trillion Dollars. Holy smokes, that is an all time record! At this pace, 100 trillion in wealth should be eclipsed by some time around 2020. Net debt? "Domestic nonfinancial debt outstanding was $41.7 trillion at the end of the first quarter of 2015, of which household debt was $13.6 trillion, non-financial business debt was $12.2 trillion, and total government debt was $16.0 trillion." Net debt to net worth, 49 percent. Is that a huge problem? I guess not, it sounds better than any other country that I am hearing about, and to be very honest, I would rather the debt be backed by that wealth.




Company corner

Twitter CEO Dick Costolo has resigned after five years on the job. Twitter's subscriber growth has slowed, the company recorded subscriber growth of 18 percent in the first quarter of the year, on the conference call Costolo indicated that April had been slow. Meaning that subscriber growth had slowed further. I think the problem that new Twitter followers have is that they do not understand what it is useful for. For me Twitter is a customisable news feed. You can follow people who are awesome aggregators, you can follow your favourite sportspeople, actors, politicians and so on.

Moving into the void is Twitter co-founder (and current chairman) Jack Dorsey. Dorsey will not be in the team that is going to hunt down a new CEO. As this WSJ article points out: Twitter CEO Dick Costolo Stepping Down, Costolo took the business from a startup to a listed business. Since the listing however, "things" have gone badly for the share price. Perhaps the pace of subscriber growth has not been as high as investors would hope. The "proprietor" of Lowercase Capital, a fun guy by the name of Chris Sacca penned this post a few weeks ago: I Bleed Aqua. As he said: "At one point I had even exhausted all of my savings purchasing Twitter shares and was technically insolvent."

Sacca was inside of the first 140 users he says. I think he is right in suggesting that there is no natural ceiling on the revenue Twitter can generate. Extinction in hardware and software happens in front of your eyes. BBM, Blackberry was crushed by WhatsApp, Samsung, Android, Apple. Done for. Twitter is however one of the big 5, in my mind. Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter and Pinterest. There is of course Google plus, Tumblr and Flikr, let me not forget LinkedIn. Missed anything? Sorry if I have.

According to Alexa, who rank the most visited sites in the world, the current order is Reddit, News.Yahoo.com, CNN.com, Huffingtonpost.com and Nytimes.com. Reddit is a mess and the users fund the site. Yahoo? There is a surprise. Most of the sharing options are Twitter and Facebook, in the old days it was to email it to your colleagues. Although that seems front and centre, the email option. Twitter is fast news, Facebook is topical news. That is my sense. No offence to Facebook, I think the platforms are great, Twitter is where the higher brow conversations happen {hides}.

If you read the NY Times piece titled: Twitter's C.E.O., Dick Costolo, Is Set to Exit, Feeling Heat of Criticism, you can see all the high profile folks coming and going. The company obviously needs something fresh, someone to drive advertising, perhaps the co-founder is not the right person. I suspect however that Sacca is right. I really, really like Periscope, I think that the sorting function needs to be better. The market is rejoicing, quarteritis is contagious, Wall Street needs and wants it. I hope that the company just ignores the needs and pleas of Wall Street and just focuses on building a better platform for their committed users. The share price is up nearly 4 percent, the market enjoys this outcome. Sigh.




Stat of the day

This is an interesting "fact" that Johann Rupert, the chairman of Richemont put forward in the Opening Keynote of the FT Business of Luxury Summit 2015, earlier this week. Fast forward to 11:15 minutes and then you hear about global warming, then he talks about if you had to vacuum pack each and every individual and stick them in a can (like sardines, says Rupert), how much space would that fill? He says that you will fit three times the worlds population into a 1 km cube. Imagine that? He says he checked it, checked it and checked it, calling his son to make sure that he wouldn't make a fool of himself. And then the awesome South Africanism came through: "Yet we manage to stuff the world up."

Put differently, from this National Geographic Quiz: "Standing shoulder-to-shoulder, the entire world's population could fit within the 500 square miles (1,300 square kilometers) of Los Angeles." Rupert is right, how is it possible that we "stuff the world up" with so much space. Fast forward to 18:45 minutes segment, you see the stuff that everyone is talking about, Rupert is worried that we will have an abundance of resources, yet they will belong to the richest of the rich. Not only does Rupert cite the rise of robots and machines as a concern, so does Elon Musk. Makes you think about all the progress that we have made in AI and robotics, yet all of us only fit into one third of a 1 kilometre cube.




Linkfest, lap it up

This goes to the heart of that line that I often use, rich people problems will be solved by rich people. What Italy and Germany Show us about the future of social security. Loads of people in countries that you think would believe that the government is forever, are actually not that confident about government in the future. This may be a perfect moment for Germany, the US, Italy to implement longer dated policies with hard decisions today.

What are your thoughts on Organic farming? The land yields less crops which means that the produce is then more expensive, which is great if you can afford to pay more for the food. What about the people who cant afford to pay extra for food? - Organic farming can actually be more profitable than using fertilizers and pesticides. Here is a reason why more farmers are not going Organic, "It takes three years of organic farming before a farmer can label his produce "organic" and cash in on that surcharge.”

Energy usage patterns wont change until costs of fossil fuels rise and renewable energy costs coming down. The prices are moving in the right direction - India's diesel-guzzling railways are testing coaches with solar panels

It is great to see how renewable energy is being used for the benefit of the community - Maasai women lead a solar revolution

These stats show how important renewable energy is to the African continent - How electricity problems are limiting growth in many African countries. It is scary to see the number of people who are still without electricity.



Cars talking to each other is what will most likely happen in the future, it should make roads safer and if coordinated correctly, less congested - Land Rover wants its cars to warn drivers about potholes




Home again Our markets are flat here today. Commodities are lower here, the Rand is weaker as the Dollar gathers momentum again. The Euro is lower of course, this Greek message is hardly exciting, people are starting to get used to the idea. A favourite comparison doing the rounds is that of Obama only focussing on the state of Tennessee for 5 years. Greece is to Europe what Tennessee is to the US overall economy.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Thursday, 11 June 2015

The Good Old Days



"My point is simple. It always turns out better than you think. There is never a better time to own equities than today. There is no use saying that I missed the March 2009 generational lows and trying to wait for another one. There are so many articles that tell you how the world is ending and that stocks are going down 50 percent tomorrow. In reality, through the 50 years that Buffett has been associated with Berkshire Hathaway, the shares have lost their value by more than 50 percent twice. Or strangely, once in a generation. Makes you think, doesn't it?"




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Whoa. It is not often that you see a move like that, stocks locally up nearly one and three quarters of a percent, halting the worst emerging market sell off in nearly a generation. 24 years right, that is in the middle of what is considered Generation time. If you read the Wiki piece you can see that a generation measure is pretty simple, the time taken to produce the next generation. As simple as that. I can imagine that in some parts of the world it is much higher than in other parts of the world, people are having fewer children and indeed, having children later in life.

The population explosion in the last few generations has been something to behold. According to various measures there have been around 105 to 110 billion people to have ever walked the earth. We crossed 1 billion people for the first time around the time when Napoleon was awesome, 1804. It took another 127 years for the next billion to be added, the human population effectively doubled from 1804 to 1927. The next billion, i.e. from 2 to 3 took 33 yeas, by 1960 there were 3 billion souls alive at any one given time. And then "things" really sped up. By 1975 there were four billion of us, 5 billion was reached in 1987 (a mere 12 years), by 1999 there were 6 billion and in 2012 we had crossed the 7 billion mark, slowing from the pace of adding a billion every 12 years.

Expectations are that we will reach 8 around 2025, slowing again after that, 9 billion by 2045-2050. As famed baseball player and coach, Yogi Berra said: "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." Berra quotes make those of "The Honey-Badger" (Nick Cummins) seem lame. No wonder consumption has rocketed like it has, at the same time rapid industrialisation has taken place too, over the last 40 years. Urbanisation rates are over 50 percent now, in 1950 that was closer to 30 percent. Back then (and I am guessing, doing simple math), in 1950, with around 2.7 billion people on the planet, only 800 million lived in cities. Nowadays, there are 7.3 billion of us, with the urbanisation rate over 50 percent there are 3.7 billion people in cities. So nearly 3 billion people have moved to cities in 65 years, roughly 46 million a year. And we have not starved, as Malthus suspected, the Malthusian catastrophe did not transpire.

Why didn't this happen? It is not as if there was more arable land available? Crop yields have rocketed. In the US, last year (a record year) corn yields were an estimated 171.7 bushels per acre. See this graph which shows United States long term yields per acre, revolutionised farming methods must have started post the Great Depression.



And it seems to be getting better and better, meaning that greater technological innovations mean that people can live and work in cities if they prefer. The yield per acre of land, for corn at least and specifically to the US, has increased 8 fold in a time that the population has increased less than fourfold. Yet the sad truth is that 2 billion people globally go to bed hungry each and every night, and more than 1 billion people are obese, remembering that obesity is not necessarily connected to wealth, rather cheaper calories. You can talk about the good old days, the truth is that generally human lives have been improved. I guess it is easy to say from where I sit, tell that to somebody in the multiple conflict zones around the world, of which there is the Global Conflict Tracker tool. Sad.




There are more of us demanding more services and products. Newer companies are being formed all of the time, providing products and services that you would have thought not useful 40 years ago. Look at your desk, look at all the things around you and imagine a world with a rotary dial telephone and nothing else on it, other than an in and out tray. I saw a fabulous video that describes exactly that. See here, how all the clutter on your desk moves to your notebook (laptop) over time:

(video courtesy of:bestreviews.com/best-desk-chairs#evolution-of-the-desk)

My point is simple. It always turns out better than you think. There is never a better time to own equities than today. There is no use saying that I missed the March 2009 generational lows and trying to wait for another one. There are so many articles that tell you how the world is ending and that stocks are going down 50 percent tomorrow. In reality, through the 50 years that Buffett has been associated with Berkshire Hathaway, the shares have lost their value by more than 50 percent twice. Or strangely, once in a generation. Makes you think, doesn't it?




Factoid of the day

We take fixed income markets for granted, we take equity markets and interest rates for granted, yet we never question how they came about? According to Wiki, the first general government bond was issued by what is today the Netherlands, less than 500 years ago. In 1517. Interest rates were around 20 percent, talk about expensive debt! The very first government debt issued by a national government was apparently the English, back in 1694. It must have been complicated, from a reporting point of view. What is more astonishing is that the very first electronic trading platform, the NASDAQ, is less than 50 years old. Although the evolution to straight through processing (matching on market in an electronic environment) did not happen immediately, we now take it for granted that sometimes we are trying to buy or sell stocks against algorithms and high frequency trading participants, happy to have the liquidity.

What I have not been able to conceptualise is why global daily forex transactions is in excess of four trillion Dollars, the US international trade of goods for their entire year is around the same amount, and equal to just over one-fifth of their entire economy. What is also very interesting is that whilst commodities investing may not be the best long dated place to part with your hard earned money, commodity trading as a percentage of global trade is more than any other industry.




Linkfest, lap it up

Many of the web pages that you use get revenue from advertising, which is then used to produce the content and maintain the site. What happens though when people use software to block adds? As more people move online this question becomes more prominent - Block shock

Here is why Amazon is leagues ahead of their competitors, given their scale they can do things cheaper than the rest and create big brand loyalty - Why Amazon Is Putting 'Minions' on Their Boxes

It is hard to comprehend that there are still countries as isolated and backward as North Korea - This is what it's like to teach in North Korea.

It is not a surprise given all the hype around the fight that Mayweather and Pacquiao are one and two - The World's Highest-Paid Athletes. It still blows my mind that someone can earn that much off one fight! I suppose when there are only two athletes to share the profits, they take home big money. Compare that to Football where there are two teams to split the profits between.

Here is a nice list of food you can feel better about eating - 10 foods to nourish your brain. Glad to see that red wine and dark chocolate made the list.

This is a pretty long article which goes through energy consumption patterns of human beings, starting with the discovery of fire and ending with the awesomeness of Tesla. The objective of the article is to show how Tesla will change everything. If you do not read it word for word, browse through it and speed read. There are also some great images and graphs. How Tesla will Change Your Life.




Home again Markets are marginally higher here after the huge rally yesterday. The currency is weaker and commodity prices are down, that tells you that the Dollar is stronger.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Wednesday, 10 June 2015

Luxury Online



"Gucci is the only brand of Kering SA that is not selling on the platform yet, the company owns brands such as Alexander McQueen, Bottega Veneta, Stella McCartney and strangely Puma too, as well as Volcom and others. I am guessing that the reference to Amazon.com having the size and scale is something that Rupert sees as a threat to their collective businesses. He wants to maintain the quality, the reason why these companies do not cheapen their brands by mass producing affordable items, is to keep the allure."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Emerging market stocks as a collective have just recorded their longest losing streak in 24 years. This is in terms of days in a row sold off. 24 years is a long, long time ago. Nelson Mandela had only been released for a year from his 27 year jail sentence. Boris Yeltsin was elected as president of Russia back in 1991. The cold war ended that year, some can argue it has kind of restarted. Eden Hazard is at the top of the world, in terms of football, he was born in that year.

Apartheid ended that year, all the rules that kept ourselves from ourselves (incredibly dumb) were repealed. The Oceanos went down near Coffee Bay, remember that ship that sunk, the captain made sure he was off early? Nadine Gordimer won the Nobel prize for Literature. Paul's favourite movie Terminator 2 was the highest grossing film in 1991. One of my favourites, the spoof movie Hot Shots was 9th. The top song on the charts globally that year was Everything I Do, I Do it For You by Canadian Bryan Adams. The S&P 500 ended the year close to 400 points. We have seen a fivefold increase in the index in 24 years, with many trials and tribulations along the way. Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Amazon.com, all those businesses did not exist. Mark Zuckerberg was 7 years old.

That is some context to when last emerging markets had such a long losing streak, in terms of number of days of selling in a row. Percentage wise it is hardly huge, we are down around 8 percent since the recent highs. Not quite what is referred to by the chartists as a "correction". There are all sorts of words for short down and up periods, the Dow Jones is up over 2000 percent in 40 years, what do you call that? A lot, or just average and expected? The NASDAQ over the same time period is up 5900 percent, technology has certainly crushed it over that time, obviously all the innovations for businesses has been very profitable for the companies and by extension their shareholders.

Investing is not for the fainthearted. It is hard and requires traits that many do not want to think about, which is why forced savings in terms of retirement savings, lock ups and restrictions on access to the capital is not necessarily a bad thing for the average salaried employee. I saw a 9Gag cartoon that had the caption "I will save more money for my future" at the top and "Hey look, shoes" at the bottom. Exactly. I see people finance expensive cars over four or five years at thousands of Rands a month to end up with an asset (tool) that is worth 30 percent of what they paid for it after five years, in nominal terms. God forbid they invest that same money in the market, you could lose it, apparently. As I said to my dad in the same conversation, you need consumers to help savers get rich. You cannot force people to save and delay gratification.




Company corner

Johann Rupert, chairman and controlling shareholder of Richemont, wants to team up with his rivals. What gives? And all this is not long after Richemont had injected their Net-a-Porter business in return for an equity stake in Yoox. They have equal equity for now, they do not have control of the business. The Bloomberg story is as follows: Richemont Invites LVMH to Join Website to Compete With Amazon. The plan is to actually use the Yoox Net-a-porter platform, by getting LVMH and Kering SA to have equity in the business, Yoox that is. Johann Rupert was talking at the FT Business of Luxury Summit in the picturesque town of Monaco.

Gucci is the only brand of Kering SA that is not selling on the platform yet, the company owns brands such as Alexander McQueen, Bottega Veneta, Stella McCartney and strangely Puma too, as well as Volcom and others. I am guessing that the reference to Amazon.com having the size and scale is something that Rupert sees as a threat to their collective businesses. He wants to maintain the quality, the reason why these companies do not cheapen their brands by mass producing affordable items, is to keep the allure.

I mean, if money was no object, would you object to a 4100 Dollar Babylone PM LVMH bag? It looks really nice as far as bags go, I have seen with my own eyes and heard how people will "sell their souls" for such items. If you are into shoes, then this one is for you guys, the Framework Richelieu, at a cool 1240 Dollars a pair. The Richemont brands are on the Net-a-porter website, you can get a Chloe Fedora leather shoulder bag for 2245 Dollars. Sorry, that one is actually sold out. Yes, sold out, meaning all of them have been bought.

The question is, would you buy a (the most expensive item) 70 thousand Dollar Olivia Collings 1840s silver, amethyst and diamond bracelet online? It is apparently one of a kind, with a certificate of authentication. I can see items that are not exactly out of reach of rich middle income people, more mainstream stuff being sold online. For your luxury item such as a Van Cleef & Arpels Palmyre necklace, 6 rows, described as "Six rows of round diamonds complement a graceful mounting in white gold for this elegant necklace" is marked on the online store at a cool 360 thousand Euros. That is a little over five million Rand. Is that with or without sales tax? Of course you would want to feel and try the item on before parting with that much money.

What this indicates to me, the move that Rupert is calling on his industry peers to sell on one platform (certified) is that he wants the exclusivity to remain exactly that. No cheapening of the brands, he knows the importance of that.




The Sasol chief David Constable will not be renewing his contract when it expires next year. He will be staying on as a consultant however, ironically closer to his family. The news filtered through two days ago. In an increasingly global world it is possible to commute and that is exactly what he has been doing. He is Canadian, turns (or turned) 54 this year, and has been at the company since his appointment in July of 2011. Prior to working at Sasol, Constable was at Fluor Corporation, the US engineering and construction company, that are specialists in the oil and gas industry, he is a civil engineer by trade.

I suspect what has happened here is that lifestyle choices for even high earners is becoming more important, in a world where people are richer than the prior generation. How much, i.e. what is the number, that one needs in order to retire at the same level? Well, in a local context, if you can generate 35 thousand Rand per 1 million Rand invested in the equities market, per annum, what would you need to live on? That is providing that you do not eat into the capital at all. In the context of a high powered earner (one must not always assume that they have great expenses) perhaps 55 is an age where they can retire and do what they want to do. I am not suggesting that being the CEO of Sasol is not what David Constable wanted to do, all I am saying is that it is hard to commute across the globe to family on a regular basis. The weigh up of lifestyle versus income, versus pressures of the job and being available all of the time takes its toll. You could argue that it is a good problem to have.

Either way, he has quit, and that is not good for shareholders and the business. I think that there is more than enough quality to appoint a local person for the job, hopefully an engineer with enough management experience. It is a very complex business, with complex plans to morph into a more competitive global chemicals business in North America, with an enormous glut of feedstock. That would be a good future for the business.




Fact of the day

The credit card as we know it, a certain size, 85.60 x 53.98 mm or 3 3⁄8 x 2 1⁄8 inches is not that old, historically speaking. Coincidentally that size is used for several things, business cards (yes, those still exist), ID documents (the SA ones are pretty cool) and many other cards that you have no space for in your wallet. Did the card size evolve relative to your pocket size, or wallet size? Surely an early wallet where you kept physical notes superseded a money sack or money bag.

Have you ever wondered why there are all those digits on the card? It is called the PAN, or the primary account number. They are mostly 16 digits long, Visa and MasterCard are the issuers that you know the best, the first issuer to have a general purpose credit card was Diners Club. Back to those embossed numbers. The validation of the card complies with the Luhn algorithm, which was patented by a chap by the name of Hans Peter Luhn, who worked for none other than IBM. The algorithm itself is over 60 years old, you can find the original patent here: Computer for verifying numbers. That allows you to switch, obviously it is a lot more complicated now than way back then.

All the banking systems are built to conform with the past norms and will evolve as such. Technology such as Apple Pay would eliminate the ability for anyone to "see" the card, plus it involves your thumbprint to authorise the transaction from the phone. I am pretty sure that people have invented ways to collect the data. We are evolving quickly away from "real money" to an electronic transfer society, in which there is always a trail of money, as you can imagine, this behaviour will be encouraged by the authorities, it leads to more tax compliance. Goodbye credit card as you know it, being a physical entity and hello electronic payment systems using thumbprints, rather than pin numbers.




Linkfest, lap it up

The drug that most of us can't do without, coffee! Here is sciences approach to the optimal time to drink it - Why the worst time to drink coffee is actually in the morning.

Here is a new use for drones - Drones are the newest weapon in the fight against Chinese exam cheaters.

Given that I hopefully have many decades until I need sustained medical attention, seeing breakthroughs like this makes me smile just a little bit more about old age - Missing link found between brain, immune system; major disease implications. More humans on the planet, with access to better technology and more resources at their disposal are seeing medical breakthroughs happen at an increasing pace.

When looking back into history we don't normally hear much about the African continent - Mansa Musa, one of the wealthiest people who ever lived - Jessica Smith.




Home again German yields have crested 1 percent for the first time since 22 September last year. We seem to be catching a bid, finally! Markets are three quarters of a percent higher, perhaps the rates going higher anxiety crowd have had their moment. For now.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939