Monday, 21 July 2014

Amplats angle grinder

"By consolidating these mines, selling Union and focusing on lower cost mechanised mines, that tells you immediately that the company is going to be less labour intensive. There are at last look over 5000 people who have lost their jobs at Amplats since this time last year. Union employs around 7263 people, meaning these employees will no doubt be somewhere else in due course. And fewer people working in labour intensive mines. This is a direct response to labour declaring victory, forget the social issues in South Africa, this is the response from business."




To market, to market to buy a fat pig. It sounds completely crass to say it, but earnings as far as the market is concerned trumped human conflict. Market participants themselves carry emotion, collectively it is less so, over time it is insignificant. The downed Malaysian Airliner, the civil war in the Ukraine, the conflict in Gaza and the associated loss of life is too dreadful to bear, but the harsh reality is that equity prices reflect the prospects of the business. In this case it was Google which soared over four percent on Friday after some very decent results at the end of the prior session.

On a price adjusted basis to reflect the 2 for 1 split in April 2014, the all time high of Google is 615.42 Dollars. The shares with the voting rights (more than the other that is), GOOGL is now 605.11 Dollars a share. Many a brokerage house upgraded their price targets, some beyond 700 Dollars a share for what it is worth.

A price target must be one of the hardest things to do, in analysing a business you can say whether or not once you have looked under the hood that the company is a "good one", translating their earnings to an expected securities price, that is very hard. No, that is exceptionally hard. Some well paid very smart and very hard working equity analysts have the unenviable task of doing that. To set a 12 month price target on a specific stock of a specific company tells me everything I need to know.

Locally we nearly managed to get back all the losses from earlier in the session, mostly as a result of US Futures and then markets pointing to a positive outcome. The Jozi all share closed down 0.18 percent on the day, the S&P 500 added over one percent, and now is an average session away from an all time high. In the end, it is not geopolitical tensions, banking crises, sovereign debt or political dispensations that impact on markets, it is earnings from the companies that set the levels. If country X has more appealing reasons to do business in, then that will happen, companies will drift in that direction. If country Z has the opposite and makes it harder to do business, the companies will do less business there. That is the way that it works.




Truworths was the latest in the line of all the retailers to report sales numbers on Friday, the market was clearly disappointed, the stock was sold off 3.6 percent. Retailers as a collective (their stock prices that is) peaked in January 2013, since then general retailers, the index, is down over 6 percent. It could have been worse, there has been a recovery of sorts! Truworths is comfortably off their 52 week highs, the stock traded as low as 72 Rand a share Friday, their 52 week high (mid October last year) is 99.28 Rands. Why? Having read that, you would have expected their sales update to end June to be awful, so what was it?

"Truworths ... announces that Group retail sales for the 52 weeks until 29 June 2014 ("the period") increased by 6.8% to R 10.8 billion, compared to a 10.7% increase in the corresponding prior period, with credit sales growth of 5% and cash sales growth of 11%."

That sounds OK, this less so:

Like-for-like store retail sales reflected an increase of 0.6%, product inflation averaged 9%, and trading space increased by 10.3% relative to the prior corresponding period-end. Credit sales comprised 71% of retail sales (2013: 72%) during the period.

Basically sales are flat, with a larger mix of cash sales. The loan book increased by 11.8 percent to 4.7 billion Rand, one however gets the sense however that Joe Consumer is being less gung-ho with regards to credit. The sales update says: "As a result of strategic credit-related decisions taken during the prevailing tough market conditions, growth in trade receivable costs slowed in the second half of the period. The period saw continued movement from the 6 month interest free payment plan to longer term interest bearing payment plans."

We do not own the company, but are interested that over the last three odd years two things have happened that have had the same outcome. Firstly sales growth has slowed and has not kept pace as a result of a worsening credit cycle, ironic in a time of the lowest interest rates in decades. Secondly and most importantly for equity holders, the market would easily pay a twenty multiple for the forward earnings when they were trading at R100, nowadays the market will only pay in the low teens. Earnings are the same, more or less, the market is only prepared to pay a far lower multiple for the same businesses. Make sense?




Impala Platinum with a clarification announcement on Friday: Bimha Mine underground collapse. Wow, that sounds awful. It is just another reminder that underground mining is very dangerous (this fault was identified in 2011) and that this can scupper the best production intentions. When this happens however, the company has to recalibrate and report that. To restore production to full capacity, that will take 15 months, the 270 thousand per annum production is only expected to be achieved in 2016. The share price is last seen at levels in September last year.




Staying with platinum, Amplats have reported For the six months to end June 30 2014. What I find quite interesting is that the first picture has a heavy dragline that has both a Chinese and South African flag. I have no idea why, perhaps someone can enlighten me.

Tonnes milled, down 34 percent. Ore grades, 13 percent lower. Equivalent refined Pt ounces? 39 percent lower when measured against the first half of 2013, mostly as a result of the industrial action, but as the company also points out, as a result of consolidation of Union and Rustenburg mines. Refined production, platinum lower by 16 percent, palladium lower by 5 percent.

There is some interesting commentary in the segment titled Strategy overview - repositioning of the portfolio. Here is the skinny. The Rustenburg mines, the oldest ones in the portfolio have been consolidated from five mines to three which will result in 250 to 350 thousand ounces of unprofitable ounces removed from total production. Step one done. Step two is where Union mine will be consolidated into one mine, from two and the company have indicated before that this is for sale. They plan to exit it, in its entirety. This we know.

Then there are some pretty obvious ones, prioritising spend and focus on Mogalakwena, Unki, Twickenham, Amandelbult and the JV assets – Mototolo, Modikwa, Kroondal and BRPM. When you read about the specific mines in question, that are going to attract more of the companies capital, it is immediately clear what the companies response to the protracted strike has been.

Mogalakwena consists of four open pits, life of mine extends beyond 2060. Unki is a mechanised, trackless board-and-pillar underground operation, as per their page on the Amplats website. Twickenham is also out there on the Eastern Limb, currently heavy spend has seen the mine heavily mechanised. On the JV's, many of the mines are not operated by Amplats and are smaller and more nimble, they are happy to contribute their share. Again, you do not have to be a genius to figure out that Union is loss making, the Rustenburg mines are old and tired and equally unprofitable.

By consolidating these mines, selling Union and focusing on lower cost mechanised mines, that tells you immediately that the company is going to be less labour intensive. There are at last look over 5000 people who have lost their jobs at Amplats since this time last year. Union employs around 7263 people, meaning these employees will no doubt be somewhere else in due course. And fewer people working in labour intensive mines. This is a direct response to labour declaring victory, forget the social issues in South Africa, this is the response from business.

So is this business investable? I am not too sure. Production is going to be in the region of 2.1 to 2.2 million ounces, that basically has not budged for as long as I have been watching this business. The demand side looks fine, jewellery demand from China is picking up, investment demand locally (in price trackers) is good and of course European automobile sales are starting to pick up. So the demand side looks good, obviously the recycled product will be more and more in time, you would expect vehicle sales in emerging markets to continue to make traction.

How will this restructuring go down? Single commodity basket, volatile place and combative government and workforce to the company, all rather tricky at best the operating environment. There are better assets to own, better sectors to be in, like healthcare, technology and retail. We continue to avoid all these companies is this sector.




Michael's musings

When you look up the term "Blue Chip" in the dictionary you get the GE share code as the definition. GE is a company that has been around since the late 1800s, and has none other than Thomas Edison as one of its founders. This is what Wikipedia had to say about the formation, "General Electric was formed by the 1892 merger of Edison General Electric Company of Schenectady, New York, and Thomson-Houston Electric Company of Lynn, Massachusetts..."

Having a look on Google I found a very long list (to my surprise) of listed companies that are over 100 years old. There were 18 pages of around 23 companies, based on the list the only company bigger than GE that has been around over 100 years is Exxon Mobil. So GE is old, big and well diversified.

Currently the company has what they call their "Next list" which covers their R&D focus for the coming years. The list has six core research areas, Extreme Machines, Super Materials, Industrial Internet (where machines will be able to communicate with each other and us), Mapped Minds (unlocking how our minds work), Brilliant Factories (Factories that can adjust by themselves to have the efficient use of resources) and Energy Everywhere. GE spend 5% of revenue on R&D, which is low compared to JnJ (12%) and Google (14%) but when you consider the speed of change happening in the other two companies sectors, 5% seems fair.

On to the second quarter figures, there was a 13% rise in profit on a 3% increase in revenue, where strong earnings came from its jet engine division. This is an example of where the R&D spend has paid off, where their new "Leap" engine has an order backlog of $78 billion. The engine has components that are produced through 3D printing and have ceramic parts instead of a metal. Ceramics are light, strong and heat resistant, allowing more power and efficiencies out of the engine.

Currently 40% of GE profits come from the GE Capital division, which is less than ideal due to the volatility of financial assets earnings. GE is shifting towards being more industrial, by slimming down or selling their GE Capital divisions, where the 40% of profits is expected to be 25% by 2016. In the last quarter industrial earnings were up 9% and GE Capital were down 5%, highlighting the move away from Capital.

Part of the restricting of the company can be seen through the purchase of French company Alstom and through the upcoming IPO of one of GE Capital's company's, Synchrony. GE is not going to shoot the lights out, but if I had to bet on a company being around for another 100 years my money would be on it. This is a solid stock for a long term portfolio.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets are lower, the Rand is not helping equities, but surely helping fight inflation. More please, not less. No doubt another interesting week of results lined up in the US. To leave you, check out this picture (and tweet) that Paul took of us the other day: Office life at Vestact. Here it is below:






Sasha Naryshkine, Byron Lotter and Michael Treherne

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

011 022 5440

Friday, 18 July 2014

Google keeps going

"I think that this is one of the most fabulous investments that you can make, of course not for income and it certainly on a forward basis (modelling around 21 and half Dollars earnings) means that the company trades forward on 27 times earnings, this year. No dividend, quite expensive. And a year further forward, because earnings are expected to grow faster over the next two years."




To market, to market to buy a fat pig. It has all gone crazy, the world, all of a sudden. The loss of lives on both sides in Israel and Gaza is heartbreaking to see, so needless and so pointless in my mind, something that raises emotions on both sides. All I have to do is watch my Twitter stream to realise that this is a very emotional issue.

As needless and as pointless was the Malaysian Airlines flight MH17, a Boeing 777 shot out of the sky by a missile. 298 souls departed, many Dutch tourists and many folks on their way to an AIDS conference in Melbourne, trying to save lives. Three infants on board. An epic disaster, a civilian aircraft being shot out of the sky. This has happened too many times for comfort, since the beginning of World War Two, there are over twenty incidents according to Wikipedia.

In terms of the ones that caused a lot of tension, here is a heartbreaking account of these incidents: 7 times militaries have shot down civilian planes. And of course the subsequent repercussions, if any. As you can see, many times civilians are caught up in other peoples ideological beliefs. The First World War and the famous Canadian soldier and physician, John McCrae, who wrote "In Flanders Fields" did much to see war less as heroic and more as horrific.

As far as I can tell, I am the first chap to have not fought in a war in my family, or to have been in the army. Probably ever. So whilst this feels like the current landscape rings true the words to the Dr. Alban song, Fire in Bosnia and the Billy Joel song, We Didn't Start the Fire, armed conflicts are fewer in history now than at any other time. They are however a reminder that we use man made equipment to distinguish our fellow man. If we were all educated a little better and were more about humans rather than nationalities and ethnic origins we would be all the better for it.

The upshot of all of this is that equity markets sell off. The S&P 500 sold off nearly 1.2 percent, the nerds of NASDAQ much more, down 1.4 percent. The Dow Jones lost over 100 points, but nowadays that is less than a percent. I know that what the Fly said was sensitive, but it does make sense at some levels, he tweeted:



Of course the longer term implications are completely unknown, let alone the shorter term implications. Markets will sell off. The tricky part for ordinary investors is to try and do nothing, if anything, use this as an opportunity to buy businesses. Remember, you own businesses and not markets or sentiment.

The sentiment part has a lot to do with short term price movements and volatility of equity markets, nothing to do with the company. The only part that irritates me is that the buzz around equity markets being overvalued and due for a correction, those types will say that they told you so, even if this has nothing to do with their thesis. That rubs me up the wrong way, just that, I can take in my stride the geopolitical events weigh on markets, not people that pretend they know what is going to happen next. Nobody knows that.

And if all that was not enough for you to take in, then you will have to pay 25 basis points more for your debt. Or, if you have savings, cash savings that is, you just started earnings more interest. Why? In case you missed it, the MPC raised the repo rate by 25 basis points yesterday, trying to keep the inflation genie in the bottle. Michael is seething mad. Food, transport and utilities prices increasing have got nothing to do with demand he says, he is of course right. Whilst you can do without beer and cigarettes (seen as defensive sectors somehow), you cannot do without transportation and food. And lights and water. I am going to leave the full lot to Michael, he is a whole lot more passionate about this than me.




Google released their second quarter numbers post the bell yesterday, they were very good, in my opinion. You can download the .pdf: Google Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2014 Results and Management Change. Revenues for the quarter of 16 billion Dollars (an increase of 22 percent), operating income was 4.26 billion Dollars, 27 percent of revenues. Nice. On a non GAAP EPS, excluding stock-based compensation (SBC) expense (what the hell?) that number was 6.08 Dollars.

This is still an out and out advertising business. The volumes, or number of paid clicks increased 25 percent in the second quarter, 2 percent over the prior quarter. The cost per click, or the price that Google gets decreased 6 percent over the first quarter this year and 7 percent over the comparative quarter last year. Traffic Acquisition costs, or the money that is paid to the Google partners (advertising sharing) was nearly ten percent higher when compared to the corresponding quarter.

Cash on hand? A whopping 61.2 billion Dollars, they generated nearly three billion Dollars of cash in the quarter. As a percentage of the 395.7 billion Dollar market cap, that is 15.4 percent. Of course Google still does not pay a dividend. As they are a growth company (they hired around 2200 people over the quarter), meaning that costs are not exactly front and centre. They spent more on R&D, 14 percent of revenues, than JNJ, who spend just a little less than 12 percent. Astonishing how they encourage their workforce to express themselves, to find the next big thing. It is still just an online advertising business, that is it.

I think that this is one of the most fabulous investments that you can make, of course not for income and it certainly on a forward basis (modelling around 21 and half Dollars earnings) means that the company trades forward on 27 times earnings, this year. No dividend, quite expensive. And a year further forward, because earnings are expected to grow faster over the next two years. Quite quickly the forward multiple reduces to a 22, earnings for 2015 as per the analyst community are expected to be over 27 Dollars for the year.

This businesses revenue mix has also changed, it is now less of a US business and more of an international business, as per the graphic from the presentation slides:



Almost a percent per quarter shift, as a shareholder you want more geographies, more languages, more businesses and more customers from all around the world. The internet of things, in which everyone will be connected will of course have many advertising platforms, from your fridge, to your car, to buildings, to everything in-between. Fibre, that is going to be big, the company is certainly teeing up for all their other businesses. Apps, content in the "store", that is set to become bigger, there are hundreds of Android users out there looking for apps. We continue to add to what is an amazing business now and what I consider the General Electric of the 21st century and a must own.




Michael's musings: The SARB – Growth and Inflation

Interest rates were very slightly raised yesterday afternoon by the SARB to bring our Repo rate up 25 basis points to 5.75%.

The main reason for the raise is due to the sole mandate of the SARB being to try keep inflation between the 3% and 6% range. Currently CPI is sitting at 6.6% mostly due to what is called "imported inflation" because the inflation arises from a weaker currency which makes imported goods more expensive.

The most visible and probably most powerful weapon that the SARB has at its disposal is the Repo rate which has an immediate impact on consumers' pockets and lending rates for corporates. The theory goes that raising interest rates puts a lid on people spending too much and thus prices should go up slower.

The problem in South Africa at the moment is that most of the inflation is not from too much spending but from costs that the consumer has no control over. If we remove petrol (oil price), electricity (above inflation price increase) and food (we have to eat and can't control crop yields) core inflation is 5.5%.

Add to that the growth in unsecured lending growth is at its lowest since 2005, and consumer lending levels are not growing; it starts to look like raising interest rates is a fairly ineffective weapon at the moment. The hope is that a raised interest rate will encourage money inflows from people looking for higher interest rates, with the money inflows strengthening our currency.

A stronger currency will then lower the pressures of imported inflation. The big problem though is that our interest rate does not have a huge impact on our currency. Yesterday we saw the Rand strengthen right after the decision, but as soon as the jet crashed in the Ukraine the currency did an about-turn. The next time there is an "emerging markets crisis" or even worse South Africa drops one more place in the ratings to "Junk" status the Rand will weaken again.

South Africa is not going to even grow at 2% this year and rates going up will not help the situation. Growth is not the goal of the SARB but keeping inflation under 6% is, so they almost had no choice but to raise rates. The one good thing about a small rate rise now is that when the developed economies start to raise rates next year, we won't have to have big and quick rate hikes. We are now in a situation where rates will probably rise slowly back to "normal" levels.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets have sold off, the Rand is stronger, just by a little, I was perhaps expecting a bigger sell off. I see that S&P 500 futures are marginally positive. And of course it is Mandela Day, that is to make you feel at least a bit better about the man that graced our country. A magic person whom we can all feel warm and fuzzy, do your bit today, or this weekend, or each and every day. A little bit each and every day!




Sasha Naryshkine, Byron Lotter and Michael Treherne

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

011 022 5440

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

JNJ, over and over again

"The conclusion back then remains exactly the same, the enduring quality of the business remains. In fact for 128 years that they have been around (there were three brother that founded the business, not two), there have been only 7 CEO's, including the current chap, Alex Gorsky. Listed since 1944, 29 consecutive years of unbroken earnings increases and currently in the 52 year of unbroken higher dividend payments."




To market, to market to buy a fat pig. The markets ended the session here locally on a positive note, after having spent most of the day climbing after a negative start. Earnings from some of the big US banks were all pleasing, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs both beat comfortably and their stocks rose. JNJ, which we will look at later was a beat, their stock slid however, we will have a look at the quality of the numbers. The action however was away from the markets, where Fed chair Janet Yellen made some observations in a biannual congressional testimony: "Valuation metrics in some sectors do appear substantially stretched–particularly those for smaller firms in the social media and biotechnology industries, despite a notable downturn in equity prices for such firms early in the year."

You can read the full prepared comments, from the Fed website: Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress. It continues today, the hearing that is. If you are looking for the Q&A session, then read the WSJ who had running commentary: Live-Blog Recap, Janet Yellen. That unfortunately requires a username and password. You can follow two WSJ employees and their Twitter streams, that is for free. Check the tweets of Josh Zumbrun and Sudeep Reddy.

Just as an aside and something to think about deeply in terms of the direction that the developing world is moving in, Sudeep had a tweet further back that really resonated positively with me:



Back to the reaction to the Fed Chair and her prepared comments as well as the Q&A session sent markets lower. Now of course Janet Yellen is not an equities specialist, the off the wall The Real Fly said in a tweet that Janet Yellen is currently working on a newsletter called "social media is just a fad". Yellen owns stocks like Conoco Phillips and Pfizer, in conjunction with her husband, George Akerlof, who if you needed reminding is the recipient of a Nobel Prize in Economics for his work The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.

The internet is so awesome that you can find the paper, even though it was first published in 1970, you are looking at the original there. According to the Wiki entry on Internet Al Gore invented it US classrooms had 3 percent internet coverage, by 2002 that number was 92 percent. Janet Yellen did not grow up with the internet, it happened later in her life. For many people in the developing world the internet exists, but they do not have access to it. By one measure only 39 percent of all of the world have internet access. There are many more people to join and enjoy access to the ever growing dynamic library.

To end off, our old pal Cullen Roche (who has written a book, I shall see if I can read it!) had a post titled Yellen: Stocks and Bonds Are Overvalued, in which he points out the obvious: Not to mention the fact that, despite being Fed Chief, Janet Yellen doesn't understand the concept of "value" relative to what is a proper "value", any better than anyone else pretending to do so.... Meaning that her and the Fed's guesses are about as good as the rest of the market.




It would be amiss of us not to talk about the Chinese GDP number for the second quarter released this morning, China is of course the second biggest economy on the planet, after the US. If you include the collective European Union (505 million people), China falls into third place on the ranking tables. As we learnt from the European financial crisis, Europe can and can't be a collective.

First things first, China is not finished. Everyone always talks about that a lot. There might be a large portion of the chattering classes that suggest the same, over and over again. I suspect that the Chinese officials are well aware that the country needs to move across in time to a consumer based economy. More consumer, less development. Although with more people in the cities now that should naturally happen. Many fear the explosive loan growth is an issue, I think in time it will be more measured, there is a natural progression here. Michael will cover these in detail tomorrow, that is right up his alley. What I find quite funny is that the price of London real estate, which also rises really quickly, that is just expected.




JNJ released their second quarter results before the market opened yesterday, here, take a look: Johnson & Johnson Reports 2014 Second-Quarter Results. Pretty significant numbers in some way, pretty insignificant in the bigger picture. First and foremost, why own a conglomerate inside of the health space, why not own separate businesses in the same space? JNJ is actually a fairly rare company as far as investments go, in my last look at the business, in May of 2014, a post titled Great diversified business, we described the business:

The difference between JNJ and their "peers" as it were is that they are probably not an out and out pharma company, neither are they a consumer business. Nor are they a devices and diagnostics business. They are all of those things. In fact, in the last annual report the sales breakdown is 39 percent pharma, 40 percent devices and diagnostics and the balance, 21 percent is their consumer division. The acquisition of the business Synthes, an orthopaedics business has boosted the sales of the devices division specifically.

The conclusion back then remains exactly the same, the enduring quality of the business remains. In fact for 128 years that they have been around (there were three brother that founded the business, not two), there have been only 7 CEO's, including the current chap, Alex Gorsky. Listed since 1944, 29 consecutive years of unbroken earnings increases and currently in the 52 year of unbroken higher dividend payments. That counts for a lot. In their description of themselves, the company suggests that they touch the lives of over one billion people a day. As such, you can see that almost everyone knows their brands and business.

Their devices and diagnostics business as a standalone is currently the biggest in the world. I say currently, because there is a fair amount of M&A in this space. Very exciting, joint replacements through to monitoring devices for diabetes and other chronic diseases. That business reported flat sales versus the prior year comparable quarter, mostly domestic factors in the US, that geography experienced a fall in sales.

The Pharma business, the 8th largest standalone of its kind on the planet had a solid quarter. This was also where the surprises came from, sales were 21.1 percent higher when measured against the prior years Q2. Domestically (the US) sales rocketed 36.6 percent. Why? Well, a chronic set of Hepatitis C drugs (OLYSIO and SOVRIAD) had a fabulous quarter, and has had a very decent first half. The second half is not expected to be repeated, not because everyone will be cured with this exceptionally expensive therapy, but rather as a result of Gilead having a therapy for Sovaldi. As Gilead point out on their website, 500 million people worldwide are living with chronic hepatitis B or C infection, making viral hepatitis many times more common than HIV.

Lastly their consumer division, not great, but increasing worldwide sales when compared to Q2 2013 up 3.6 percent, slice off 1.2 percent for currency translation. Internationally doing a lot better than in their home base, that is the beauty of it all, the global environment that we live in means many more customers have access to quality products. If you have scale, eventually the price for the consumer gets cheaper, reactively speaking.

The guidance for the full year was raised somewhat, $5.85 - $5.92 per share is what the company said. At the closing price last evening 103.28 that translates through to 17.5 times earnings. The yield, currently is 2.7 percent. Which is more than US treasuries, the ten year yields 2.54 percent, which is close to a 52 week low.

The company is not expensive and it is not cheap. The quality is not in doubt, that remains enduring. If JNJ increase their dividend by 6.5 percent each and every year, in ten years time you would have had a return of around 38 percent. And you would still own JNJ, who spends around 11.7 percent of annual revenue searching for the next blockbuster drug, therapy or product. We continue to buy what is the best quality healthcare business on the planet, in our opinion.




Michael's musings: Old Foes Unite

IBM and Apple are joining forces to get more Apple products into the business world, by developing simple business apps for iOS. IBM will offer purpose built apps and support technicians, which will reach IBMs vast customer base.

In 1984 Apple and IBM where at opposite ends of the computer market, where IBM was the entrenched player and Apple was the disruptive new kid. Here is the famous Apple ad 1984, where Apple paints IBM as a Big Brother type figure.

For Apple this is a very positive move as enterprises have not been a core focus of theirs, even though 1/3 of the iPads sold last years were for enterprises. Becoming engrained in the systems of businesses also helps so ensure repeat business because corporate customers are stickier than individuals.

This also has an impact on the smartphone wars, where it is estimated that next year 30% of smartphones sold will be used for enterprise use. So this is an important segment to get a foothold.

The advantage of using Apple is that compared to other product offering, all the hardware and software comes from one company. Your laptop, tablet and phone all are made by the same people and all talk the same language, making integration far easier for the user. This deal looks good for Apple, IBM and enterprise users.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets are higher here at the start, the overall market is up 12.5 percent year to date. If you had slept for six and a half months and woken up you would have thought that very little had happened so far this year.




Sasha Naryshkine, Byron Lotter and Michael Treherne

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

011 022 5440

Tuesday, 15 July 2014

Klose wins, so does Shoprite

"The weaker Rand has helped but it is great to see that the international division of the business is becoming more and more significant. And trust me they are pushing it hard. In fact a friend of mine was in Angola last month and saw none other than Whitey Basson sitting opposite him at the restaurant. I doubt he was there for pleasure."




To market, to market to buy a fat pig. So is the Portuguese banking crisis a distant memory now? Seems so to the broader market, which marched on, the S&P added around half a percent, the Dow Jones closed above 17 thousand again. Locally we managed three quarters of a percent, driven by industrials and resources. Citi had numbers pre the market, it was a handsome beat. That was if you were only having a look at the headline numbers, the company had also agreed to pay a 7 billion Dollar settlement that comprised of 4 billion Dollars civil penalty to the US Justice department, 2.5 billion in consumer relief and the balance is to the FDIC and some of the states in which they were conducting poor mortgage business.

Criminal charges could still be brought against some of the employees. Wow. And all of this relates to what US attorney general Eric Holder describes as egregious conduct. Egregious means outstandingly bad; shocking, that is what the online dictionary tells me. Too many fines from too much poor behaviour in the go-go period could lead to lower risk taking and lower earnings. Perhaps more predictable earnings, which might make them more investable from a dividend flow point of view.

Not all banks are the same, quite simply because different banks act in different ways and engage in different forms of business. Some of them do the same business, but some do it much better, that is the nature of business, not everybody does the same thing the same way, Samsung, Apple, Nokia and Blackberry are examples of handset manufacturers, not all are equally profitable. Here are Citi (C), Wells Fargo (WFC), Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAC) and JP Morgan Chase (JPM) compared to one another over ten years.



See that? You could have owned Bank of America and Citigroup and thought that banks as investments stunk, or you could have held Wells Fargo and JP Morgan and thought that everything was just fine. JP Morgan has a yield of 2.84 percent, Wells Fargo has a yield of 2.73 percent, Citi pays 1 cent a quarter, which translates to a yield of 0.08 percent. Ditto with Bank of America, one cent a quarter which translates to a yield of 0.26 percent. Not really that good.

I guess that tells a story in itself, free cash to send to shareholders means that capital buffers are comfortably inside of the respective ratios that the regulators set. Financials over the last twelve months have under performed the broader market, in our minds, because of the cyclicality of earnings we tend to avoid banks as investments.




The next World Cup starts on the 8th of June 2018, that is a LONG, LONG way away from now. It is only when you try and recall memories from the prior World Cup that you realise how long four years is. By that time some of the social networks that we still regard as relatively new will be a whole lot more mature than before. I was pretty interested to see the interaction between ordinary people and social networks, no, not ordinary people, soccer football fans.

Facebook statistics were interesting: WORLD CUP: Final Match Is Top Sporting Event In Facebook's History. It turns out if you were a young man, between the ages of 18 and 24, and in the USA, then you fell into the demographic that discussed this event the most. Interesting, right?

On Twitter the most tweeted per minute moment was when Germany won the World Cup, check out the entire Twitter Data. There have only ever been 8 winners of the world cup, Brazil (5 times), Germany and Italy (4 times), Argentina and Uruguay (twice), and once apiece for France, England and Spain. Germany have been in 8 finals matches, more than Brazil. Those two countries hold the record for most last 8 qualifications, 17 apiece. Twitter has only been in two finals. Facebook in three.

For many young people Twitter and Facebook (and even old people like me) are the go to news platforms, where it can be discussed and dissected with opinions. There are many opinions on Twitter and Facebook. Perhaps in four years time there can be another platform, or these ones will be stronger, their status with advertisers and the global reach has certainly been enhanced by events like this.




Byron's beats are bigger than Apple's Dr. Dre's

Following the Massmart update last week we received one from Shoprite yesterday which reiterated my assumption that customers have had a pretty strong first half of the year. Let us look at the announcement and then we can take a closer look at the details.

"For the 12 months to June 2014 the Group increased total turnover by 10.5% to about R102.2 billion, compared to the corresponding 12 months of 2013. Growth on a like-for-like basis was 5.1%. The Group saw an improved turnover growth of 11.4% in the second half of the year, compared to 9.7% in the first half.

The continued pressure on consumers' disposable income reflects in the slow-down in sales in the South African supermarket division, the largest division in the Group, which grew sales by 8.7%.

When converted to Rand, the turnover of the 169 supermarkets the Group operates outside the borders of South Africa, increased by 26.8% compared to the 2013 reporting period. Taken at constant currencies these operations grew by 16.2%.

The furniture division grew turnover by 12.2% even though the highly competitive market conditions remained unchanged."

Lots of interesting information there. We can see that the first half of this year has in fact been better than last year. For Shoprite that is. And 10.5% overall for the year is a very strong number. Retailers in other parts of the world would kill for that kind of growth. Growth on a like-for-like basis which was 5.1% tells us that inflation has been heavy and that price increases have been absorbed. Don't forget though that Shoprite are also opening up lots of new stores which boosts sales of course.

The obvious kicker there is the massive growth we are seeing outside of South Africa. The weaker Rand has helped but it is great to see that the international division of the business is becoming more and more significant. And trust me they are pushing it hard. In fact a friend of mine was in Angola last month and saw none other than Whitey Basson sitting opposite him at the restaurant. I doubt he was there for pleasure.

12.2% growth in the furniture division is very commendable when you consider how tough that environment has been. With brands such as OK Furniture and House & Home I can only think they have been stealing market share from the likes of Lewis, JD Group and Ellerines who have not been having a great time out there.

All in all a good set of numbers and the market has followed suit. In fact the whole retail sector is up 9% so far this year after a shaky start. Like I mentioned in the Massmart coverage, I still think the ride will be bumpy but stick with the quality and you will be rewarded over the long run. Woolworths and Massmart remain our preferred stock picks in this sector.




Michael's musings: The world moving forward - Better for everyone

Below is a picture from a recent application by Airbus to the US patient office. My first reaction was to think why would they want to make the customer experience worse? Thinking about it further, the airlines are doing more with the resources that they have, meaning tickets will cost less and more people will be able to fly.



On short flights, airlines will be able to get more people on board, reducing the cost of tickets and allowing the consumer to have more money to spend elsewhere. There would still be seats with more leg room that you can pay up for, so you have options.

Here is a link to a clip that Sasha directed me to titled Everything is Amazing and Nobody's happy", the comedian talks about how technology has improved over the last few decades with particular reference to the airline industry at 2.45 minutes in the clip.

Another great article The good old days, which I think Sasha put a link to a couple of months ago, compares the cost of appliances today compared to 30 years ago. A dishwasher 30 years ago cost the average worker 48.5 working hours, compared to today where the average worker would only have to work 26.7 hours to afford one. Add to that, modern dishwashers are 123% more energy efficient, more savings.

The world gets wealthier as we find more efficient ways of doing things with our limited resources. I'm not a fan of less leg and arm room on an aeroplane but it will result in more efficient travel and society becoming wealthier.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets are marginally better this morning, a fraction really. The German football team arrived back home to thousands of people getting excited. Good for country morale no doubt.




Sasha Naryshkine, Byron Lotter and Michael Treherne

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

011 022 5440

Monday, 14 July 2014

Woolies over Lew hurdle

"The important part in there is that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission believe that in Australian Law, Woolworths have breached "equality of opportunity", obviously in favour of Lew. That is another 213 million Aussie, or 2.15 billion Rand for Lew, but that is presuming that the court hearings this Thursday are in Woolworths favour. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission, according to the SMH article may raise all sorts of objections."




To market, to market to buy a fat pig. Err..... Crisis, what crisis? I get alerts from certain applications on my phone, they give you updates, push ones. In addition to Twitter, which if you have never used it, I like to describe as the most customisable of news apps, these push notifications are pretty cool. The one I got this morning however was pretty funny, it went something along the lines of: "Asia shares higher as Portuguese bank fears dissipate". That is the nature of the beast, the collective tends to panic from time to time.

I was hearing people on the screens talking about a Euro-crisis 2.0 and that the structural problems in Europe had not been addressed. Tell that to the people of Greece. The graphics might tell us that the shortfall in the Eurozone relative to GDP matched that last seen in 2008 and at lower rates to boot. Meaning that the spending had been reigned in. The reason why I say tell it to the Greeks is because they still grapple with high unemployment rates, the good news is that the market welcomed them back, four years on, with 3 billion Euros raised at under five percent cost to the country. But yet the Greeks still have borrowings of 175 percent to their annual economic output. The other news is that the Greeks in 2013 matched their 2006 GDP.

So perhaps it was a case of not collecting enough nuts for the winter and austerity is a grim reminder that too many benefits for your people, too many people working for the government, not enough controls from the same bigger government is not sustainable. In the short run everyone feels like the proverbial winner, but eventually the chickens come home to roost. Whatever that means, personally I remember collecting the eggs from a chicken run when I was around 4 or 5, it was not a pleasant experience. Those chickens lived inside a run, so they were always home to roost.

I think the points worth making are that confidence in Europe is still fragile and that I think both austerity and stimulus will work for their respective economies. Debt of one country is the asset of another, there may be many state liabilities that are there to meet their obligations, but equally there are many state assets that can be carved up and ultimately better run. For the record Greek GDP is five times the size of what it was 35 years ago, perhaps like the mythical Icarus, who tried to escape from Crete with his wax and feathers, only to fly too close to the sun, Greece was not ready to enjoy the same benefits of their Northern Europeans brothers without the same productivity.

The US markets eeked out small gains Friday as it was apparent that this must be an isolated case, Portugal is relatively small as far as economies go, even though they once ruled the seas and the world. That was a long, long time ago. We had seen financials and banks bounce back hard here, steering the local index to a third of a percent gain on the day, above 51 thousand points again for the Jozi all share. Resources dragged again, the swirling data from China is a concern for many. China is not a democracy, the data is mistrusted, that is the perception and therefore = reality in the minds of the folks allocating capital. It does get frustrating sometimes, we have to live with the fact that Chinese data is not going to be accepted in the same way as German data.

Germans are efficient and clinical (perception), even if they eventually laboured to a fourth world cup title, well done, they were worth it. The Brazilians might have felt aggrieved at only achieving fourth place, the truth is that they beat 205 other associates. Better luck next time in Russia. Yekaterinburg (named after Peter the Great's wife) is four hours behind us here, which makes for tricky times for the European (and worse luck for the Americas) television audiences. The difference between here and Moscow at this time of the year is a mere two hours. Ah well, pencil in 8 June 2018 as the next greatest world cup, they certainly are special. About having representation there....... that would be *nice*.




Woolies news, David Jones' shareholders have voted overwhelmingly for the South African company to buy them out, check out the release from down under: David Jones Shareholders Vote in Favour of Scheme of Arrangement. 96.81% percent of the shares in issue voted in favour of the deal, but only 89.64% percent of the holders voted in favour. Meaning that whilst the people that had most of the shares voted in favour, many private individuals probably thought this was a bad idea.

OK, so what next for Woolworths? What are they waiting for? Well it looks like the money flows on the 1st of August, out of Woolies and into the hands of the David Jones shareholders. At 4 Dollars a share that amounts to 2.149 billion Aussie Dollars, at the current exchange rate that amounts to 21.67 billion Rand. That represents 31.95 percent of the closing market capitalisation of Woolworths on Friday. I get the sense that the market is warming to the deal, believing that the execution of the current management team is stronger than most businesses down under. Most businesses have not owned what is a successful Australian retile operation for nearly two decades, in the form of Country Road.

Remember that in order to shunt through this deal, Woolies had to buy out Solomon Lew, who had bought Country Road (and held it for 17 odd years) at 2 Aussie Dollars, he exited now at 17 Dollars a share, a good return in a developed market for a retail stock. Good for Lew, he got what he wanted in the end, good for Woolworths too, they get all of Country Road.

That part is not done and dusted. The Sydney Morning Herald reports David Jones' fate hangs in the balance as Lew mulls takeover deal. The important part in there is that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission believe that in Australian Law, Woolworths have breached "equality of opportunity", obviously in favour of Lew. That is another 213 million Aussie, or 2.15 billion Rand for Lew, but that is presuming that the court hearings this Thursday are in Woolworths favour. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission, according to the SMH article may raise all sorts of objections.

One step at a time then, Thursday will be key and we will know by the early morning, as a result of the time zones.




I was reading the Eskom results on Friday afternoon - 2014 results, trying to get a sense of who to compare the parastatal to, if it were a listed business. That is the tricky part, a business that is accountable to all parties at all times and without any government guarantees has to be more efficient, there is an element of failure attached. Without a doubt the company is less efficient in the absence of real competition.

First of all, I do not get upset if the company makes a profit. I would want them to be more profitable in order to service their debt obligations. You can download their Integrated Report 2014 and see that they currently have debt of around 255 billion Rand, or 6.2 percent of GDP. One parastatal has that much debt, most of it is to grow the grid. As the report points out: "Between 1994 and 2014, our generating fleet capacity has been expanded from 37 636MW to 41 995MW", an increase of 11.6 percent over 20 years. As per the same report however, "When the build programme is completed in 2019/20, Eskom will have increased its capacity by 17 384MW". Obviously since 1994, many measures in South Africa are benchmarked against the democracy time line.

Obviously the company fell behind, demand has spiked significantly since then, 5 232 915 customers now compared to 872 509 cutovers back in 1994, mostly as a result of households access to electricity having risen from 44 percent in 1994 to 85 percent currently. You think about that for a second, 2 out of every 13 households in South Africa do not have what you take for granted. Hot water for one, power for cooking, entertainment and warmth. The ability to be able to learn, to read and write, to improve your knowledge goes hand in hand with having power. We cannot work without it.

You do of course have to pay for the service. If you thought that the commercial banks had a problem, check this out: "Electricity debtors (before impairment provision) increased from R16.7 billion at 31 March 2013 to R20.2 billion at 31 March 2014. The allowance for impairment for trade and other receivables increased by R1.4 billion, from R4.3 billion in 2012/13 to R5.7 billion in 2013/14."

My interest in Eskom is only as a shareholder of Sasol. You will recall that we wrote a message last year titled Much cheaper than Eskom, in which we compared the cost of building a gas fired power station (Sasol) versus the Eskom one, Medupi. Cost per MW? Medupi at that stage was 122 percent per MW more expensive. Obviously my knowledge about gas and coal, the running costs and whether coal is cheaper at that scale over ten years is limited. It really is. So whilst it is quicker and cheaper to build gas turbines, we do have an enormous amount of coal in the ground. Eskom burnt around 122.4 million tons of coal last year. Clearly they will continue to be a massive customer of coal mines here locally.

I suspect that business and individuals will continue to adapt to rising prices and uncertainty around supply, which quite clearly comes from one point only. I would love to be a customer of someone else, I believe that private enterprise will fill any sort of gap. Eskom have property, plant and equipment, as well as intangible assets valued on their balance sheet at a whopping 404 billion Rand. Their staff costs are 546 thousand Rand per employee, that is pretty good for their 46915 employees. And by extension, these employees consume, so that is good too for the broader economy. The way the South African government view the state and their participation in the economy, I would doubt that Eskom would ever be sold, parts and or otherwise, unless there was a huge crunch, a cash crunch. The good news is that we just need to get through this winter.




Talking Sasol, some good news on the fines front. You will recall that Sasol bought a European chemicals business years ago, one of those divisions was involved in a paraffin wax cartel and fined 318.2 million Euros. They paid by January 2009, but applied to the European courts in Luxembourg for a reduction. Which was subsequently granted, the fine was reduced all of five and some more years later to 149.98 million Euros, meaning that the European Commission owes (according to the ruling) Sasol 168.22 million Euros. Which is 2.459 billion Rand at current levels.

At the time of the fine, the amount was closer to 3.7 billion Rand, which means that the ruling is more than just 168.22 million Euros, you do the math. So what they paid, in full, and the subsequent weakness of the Rand (and strength of the Euro) means that the fine amount could only have been 1.241 billion Rand. I say only, because it would have been worse for them if the currency moves went the other way. The European Commission has the right to appeal, perhaps they will.

The net benefit to you as shareholders is an accounting event of 168 million Euros, just in time for the pending results, remembering that Sasol is a June year end. Relative to their market cap this is around 0.6 percent, not a big number, but relative to their profits this is more significant. Results are expected to be released on the 8th of September.




We are being teed up for the Anglo American results with numbers coming through from their subsidiaries, at least trading updates released from both Kumba Iron Ore and Anglo American Platinum, Amplats in the last two days. The last two trading days that is. For Kumba Iron Ore results are expected 22 July, which is next Tuesday, HEPS and EPS are expected to be between 19.50 to 21.50 for the first half. This is against the 24.13 to 24.16 cps from the first half last year.

Iron ore prices have had a rough time this year, but the Kumba Iron Ore price has adjusted accordingly, year to date the share price is down 22 percent. If the company maintains a very aggressive payout ratio, then the yield should be excellent from here. The weakening Rand should have at least buffered the price, watching volumes is going to be key. Results shortly, so let us not speculate about anything just yet.

The other Anglo American company, Amplats, of which parent Anglo owns nearly 80 percent had a trading update this morning. Headline earnings per share are expected to be between 20 to 80 cents, the first half last year saw the same number at 514 cents. Phew, of course you know why there has been a precipitous fall, the crippling strike around the Rustenburg mines has been the biggest problem. From what I understand there is no doubt going to be loads of restructuring announced this time next week, that is when the results hit the screens. As such one should also wait for a detailed review this time next week.




Michael's musings: The everything store

Over the last week Amazon has been in the news for a couple of things. The first is a dispute that is going on with a publishing house called Hachette Book Group over the pricing model of e-books. The basis of the dispute is over who controls the price and how the profits are split. The current model is where the publishing house gives wholesalers like Amazon a 50% discount on the retail price and then it is up to Amazon to set the price. The model that Hachette is fighting for is to have the publishing house determine the price and the profit margin of the retailer.

The problem lies in that an e-book is cheaper than a print book by about 30%, which to me seems fair given that there is no paper involved and no transportation costs. I think the fight is more a power play and a fight for survival. With Amazon and e-books, independent authors are now able to get their books to market, all they need is a computer and their idea of a good book. From there they put it onto Amazon and if the book is any good, it should be noticed and start to sell. Under this model there is no need for the publishing house. This is the power of the internet!

The other reason Amazon are in the news is they are applying to the FAA to allow them to do drone testing in the Seattle air space. Under current law drones are not allowed to fly for commercial use, unless special permission is obtained. The special permission was there to allow drones for inspection of buildings or tracking of things like fires, not for many drone to be flying around delivery things. If they do not get approval to fly in the US they will continue testing in countries that allow drones in their airspace.

The current ninth-generation drone can fly up to 50 miles an hour and carry a 5-pound (about 2.3kg) package. The goal is to have some packagers delivered within 30 minutes of ordering. If that becomes the case it could be quicker to do shopping online as opposed to getting in your car and driving to the store, searching for what you are looking for and then driving home again.

This is a stock that forms part of our US portfolios because of them ticking the retail box and the internet box. The vast amounts of money that they are spending to setup their distribution centres around the world will make it hard for other companies to compete. Amazons earnings will be coming out next week Thursday, where we will be able to see the spend on infrastructure and if their high PE of 540 will drop.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets are up comfortably here today, it must be amazing to be German today, you are no doubt going to welcome the national team home in due course with all sorts of ticker tape parades. To be Argentinean? Well, there is the small matter of a pending default ->




Sasha Naryshkine, Byron Lotter and Michael Treherne

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

011 022 5440

Friday, 11 July 2014

Massmart looking a little more smart

"Yesterday we received a very positive trading update from Massmart for the first half of the year. In fact it was great when you consider the current tough consumer environment we are supposedly facing. For the period ending 29 June 2014 sales grew 10.2% to R35.7 billion. Inflation came in at 4.8% while comparable sales increased 7.1%. Here is the divisional breakdown."




To market, to market to buy a fat pig. My word, there was certainly some to-and-fro on Twitter yesterday, Eddy Elfenbein's feed was full of the bear hating. Take a quick look:



If you are wondering what was going on, then look no further than the Holy Spirit. Remembering that yesterday we said specifically that we were going to avoid the issues related to religion and politics, specifically when the two were mixed. What does the Holy Spirit have to do with equity markets yesterday? Well, there is a little bank in Portugal, that perhaps 99.9 percent of us had not heard about until then, called Banco Espirito Santo SA, listed on the Lisbon Stock Exchange. The literal translation of the banks name means Holy Spirit. It pretty much operates in all activities that any big financial could operate in. The anxiety is actually a level higher, it involves the parent, Espirito Santo International SA, which is a Portuguese conglomerate that owns 25 percent of Banco Espirito Santo SA.

It, being the parent company, has delayed the repayment of short term debt that it had sold to its client inside of a private bank (its own) in Switzerland. Check out the details in the WSJ, in an article titled Espirito Santo International Delays Repayment of Debt to Private-Bank Clients. And then another one I saw this morning: Espirito Santo discloses $1.6 billion exposure to GES.

So what happens? I mean, what happens when a Portuguese conglomerate is strapped for cash and cannot pay investors for short term issued debt? What happens when more specifically this conglomerate does not need to comply with market participants (outside of the usual structures) because it is not listed? I will tell you what happens. Global markets sell off and it becomes global news. That is how connected we are nowadays. The Germans sold off 1.52 percent. The French were off 1.32 percent. Lisbon, with their 58 listed companies, sank 4.18 percent collectively.

The bank in question, Banco Espirito Santo SA, sold off 17.24 percent yesterday, their five day performance, down 32.31 percent. One month? Down 54.2 percent. Three months? Down 57.24 percent. Five years? Down 76.7 percent. It looks like a steady slide. The upshot is that this bank, with a market cap of 2.8 billion Euros, or in Dollar terms 3.81 billion Dollars. 41 billion Rand. I do not want to poo-poo the importance of confidence in all banks in Europe, but it seems a little flimsy to suggest that all banks are kaputsky, because one conglomerate is in trouble.

In the end, US markets, the S&P 500 ended the session down 0.41 percent. Hardly sounds like a sell off of epic proportions? I am seeing loads of people suggesting a market correction is imminent this summer, being Northern Hemisphere summer of course. Get a globe, turn it upside down. See that there is little land down here. That is sad. So what should you do, if there is a sell off of around 5 percent? Panic? No. There may or may not be anything coming by way of a market correction. It is inevitable that markets sell off from time to time. Just stay the course. Anyhows, the Portuguese Stock market is up nearly two percent today.




Bidvest announced two separate deals yesterday. First things first, Bidvest are buying a 60 percent interest in an Italian foodservice provider Gruppo Dac S.p.A. or DAC and a significant controlling interest in a chilled product storage and distribution business in the UK, PCL 24/7 for 95 million Pound Sterling. I guess a significant controlling interest is around one quarter to one third, but it could be as much as 49 percent. In this case I reckon 30 odd percent is a good guess.

95 million Pounds is equal to 1.741 billion Rand, roughly 1.86 percent of the market capitalisation of Bidvest. It is neither hugely material, nor is it very small, it is a lot of money to anyone. It raises two interesting points, one, the group is not finding too many opportunities in food services around these parts, meaning Europe is still an attractive destination to Brian Joffe and his fabulous team, and two this is classic Bidvest. When we covered and explored the size and scale of the Bidvest consortium buying a stake in Adcock Ingram, 34.5 percent of the current market cap of the pharma company is a mere 3.13 billion Rand.

Roughly speaking, this deal announced yesterday is 55 percent of the value of the current Adcock Ingram stake. But yet it hardly gets a mention anywhere. The Adcock deal was huge, from a talking point of view, but in monetary terms it is hardly bigger than this. If you recall our write up on the company, Bidvest that is, we wrote about The Magician of Melrose Arch and the full year results. 29.6 billion Rand revenue (out of 89.6 billion Rand at a group level) came from their European Food services segment, with the Asia Pacific sales 16.4 billion Rand.

Collectively, their international food services businesses represent 51.3 percent of group sales. At an operating profits level however, these two regions represent only 29.4 percent of the group. South Africa, all the collective businesses here (other than food services), still constitute 56.6 percent of group profits. So whilst revenues for their international businesses are far greater, their profits are not. Small bolt on deals like these will see to it in time that this business becomes more international and looks to grow the Bidvest culture across the globe. And of course diversify your country risk.

Why is that important? I have noticed the more that I read annual reports, business feels somewhat alienated from government and economic policy. Here are two examples taken from the last two reports that I read, from Omnia and Holdsport, one business supplies explosives and fertiliser to the market, the other sporting equipment, they could not be further apart from one another, as far as industries are concerned.

First, in the Omnia chairman's report, Neville Crosse said the following, a screen grab I took:



Holdsport then, in their annual report and letter to stakeholders, written and signed by both chairman Syd Muller (who had the same role at Woolies once upon a time) and CEO Kevin Hodgson said the following:



The only point that I am trying to make is that businesses adjust their risk taking accordingly and spend capital where they think their shareholders will get the best return over an extended period of time. If that means outside of South Africa, because of the uncertainties (even if perceptually or real or otherwise, depending on where you stand on the issue) that prevail, then so be it. A lack of local investment could be bad for the economy here, but the businesses that can are still investing and you can benefit by being a shareholder.




There is sometimes "stuff" that I cannot understand. Let me rephrase. Most of the time there is loads of "stuff" that I cannot understand, the older I get the less I beat myself up about not being able to understand it. A "company", and the reason for the inverted commas is because there is apparently no business, one director and employee, no revenues associated with this business and no assets, has seen their share price soar 24 thousand percent in 16 days to now have a market value in excess of 6 billion Dollars. Yes. You were not dreaming, you just read that.

The company is called CYNK Technology. I have taken a screen grab of the important metrics from the CYNK Google Finance profile. It is nuts. Completely nuts. It looks like a classic pump and dump scheme, Investopedia explains:

"A pump and dump scam is the illegal act of an investor or group of investors promoting a stock they hold and selling once the stock price has risen following the surge in interest as a result of the endorsement.

The stock is usually promoted as a "hot tip" or "the next big thing" with details of an upcoming news announcement that will "send the stock through the roof". The details of each individual pump and dump scam tend to be different but the scheme always boils down to a basic principal: shifting supply and demand."

This will do two things. One, it will validate those calling social media companies a bubble, they will use this as an example of I told you so, because even I have no doubt that this will all end in tears. Two, it will once again underscore that greed trumps common sense in almost all cases, I expect to see the SEC involved shortly. This is the curious case of CYNK, the Business Insider stories have been many, here is one with an explanation: A 'Social Networking' Stock Has Exploded 25,000% In A Few Days, And It's Not Even Clear If The Company Exists.




Byron's beats are bigger than Dr. Dre (and Apple)

Yesterday we received a very positive trading update from Massmart for the first half of the year. In fact it was great when you consider the current tough consumer environment we are supposedly facing. For the period ending 29 June 2014 sales grew 10.2% to R35.7 billion. Inflation came in at 4.8% while comparable sales increased 7.1%. Here is the divisional breakdown.



As you can see all the divisions showed nice growth but Massbuild and Masswarehouse were the biggest contributors. It actually paints an interesting picture. Massbuild (Builders warehouse, Builders express) and Masswarehouse (Makro) are their strongest brands and are more geared towards the higher LSM groups. Inflation has, as always had a much bigger impact on the lower income groups. But even so Masscash which is almost directly targets the lowest LSM groups has shown some decent growth and the price increases have been absorbed.

My humble opinion is that the big shock of a weaker Rand has been absorbed and we saw those numbers come through last year. The consumer is making a comeback and many of the other retailers have also hinted this. The big question is whether this is sustainable or not?

At current growth rates as well as the inflation picture I wouldn't be surprised to see retailers under pressure again. But we don't base our long term investment decisions on macro events. That is because macro events swing up and down, they are after all cyclical. We prefer to stick with quality businesses and ride the swells.

Back to Massmart, lets not take away anything from the management team who I am sure have been working very hard behind the scenes to deliver such numbers. Lots of work has been done as far as their distribution is concerned and as mentioned above many of their brands are very strong. I guess the only concern for us is Game. We would prefer them to rebrand Game to Walmart at some stage and leverage off such a strong brand. Time will tell but we continue to hold this quality retailer.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets are flat here, but we are essentially in recovery mode for the companies and sectors whose prices have been under pressure this week. Resources are holding us back a little here, the Rand is firmer, commodity prices are a little lower. Earnings today from Wells Fargo, one of the larger US banks, that should set the tone I guess for the rest of the day, their numbers are due pre the market.




Sasha Naryshkine, Byron Lotter and Michael Treherne

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

011 022 5440