Thursday, 9 March 2017

Eyeing the China

"The company thinks that there are many opportunities in emerging markets, as well as making Japan and China big parts of their business. The share price has taken another leg up after having initially traded lower. There are loads of moving parts, and many different "things" going on."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks were marginally lower here in Jozi, down 0.15 percent on the day by the time the closing bell rang. Resource stocks sank nearly a percent by the close, industrials were better, the weaker Rand lent a hand to some of the dual listed stocks. Woolies fell sharply, they were trading ex-div, which means that if you buy them today, you won't get the dividend. Most of the selling of some other SA inc. stocks came just after 15:00, perhaps a sell order across the board? For every seller of course there is a buyer, the price is the important thing, at what level are you willing to own or not own a business and to share (or not share) in their future profits. That is the simple question with a very complex set of answers.

Lonmin clocked another 12 month low, things look a little desperate with a Rand Platinum price that is trading at and near 12 month lows too. And there everyone thought that mining was so easy and miners just make super profits. Or at least the broader public do. Mark Twain is attributed to describing a mine (although never authenticated) as "a hole in the ground owned by a liar." Hmmm .... perhaps he meant extreme optimist. Twain's real name was Sam Clemens, he himself was a prospector in Nevada. We are all the richer for him having become an author. He was also a failed inventor and went bankrupt from his business dealings. Makes sense that he harboured (perhaps) such hard feelings to miners and their optimism.




Stocks across the oceans and vast blue seas initially cheered an ADP report that showed the US economy had created nearly 300 thousand jobs in the month of February, this is the precursor to the non-farm payrolls number on Friday. See - ADP Employment Reports. Pretty much all sectors adding jobs, cementing perhaps the connection of the dots between the equity market expectations and this read, a strong labour market is good for the US. Confidence can move an economy, even if one set of confidence is another set of despair, if you get my drift.

Into the second half of the session we saw some selling emerge, energy stocks in particular were slammed during the course of the session, down two and a half as a collective. Petrobras sank over seven and a half percent by the close, Exxon off 1.8 percent and Royal Dutch Shell shed over two and a half percent. By the end of the session, the Dow was off one-third of a percent, the broader market S&P 500 sank around one-quarter of a percent and the less buffered (by falling oil prices) nerds of NASDAQ managed to squeak out a gain, up 0.06 percent by the close.

Snap cracked back, up over six and one-third of a percent on the session. Caterpillar are the current target of a government accusation that the company had committed tax fraud. Huh? In order to maintain a higher share price, the report suggests, read the NYT article titled Caterpillar Is Accused in Report to Federal Investigators of Tax Fraud. It is complicated, and relates to the Swiss subsidiary. Of course, tax rates for businesses differ all around the world. Internally the company had apparently suggested that the movement lacked a business strategy, other than the obvious. The company has not had a chance to look at the report yet, and as such, cannot comment for now. The stock sold off 2.81 percent. We shall see what transpires, we don't own any shares in the business.

David Tepper [Appaloosa asset management, a wild (mostly positive) returns and big hedge funds, 14 billion AUM] was on the box yesterday, he let slip with a few PG16L words. The CNBC host Joe Kernan tried his best to stay relevant with him. He is short bonds and long European Equities, he is still an owner of Apple stock, although he did sell some of them. He doesn't think that the market is cheap, he doesn't think it is expensive. He also said something interesting about young(ish) people that manage money. 40 year olds, people my age bracket. He said something along the lines of "guess what, it can all be good". Possibly referring to the 90's period in which people of this age would not necessarily have been "involved" in the markets.

    You are so far behind, in my mind, the curve now for the potential upside, downside potential. We can talk about the fed. we can talk about the ECB. Everybody still looks on the negative side of life on everything for some reason. Almost ten years, nine years after the downfall. It's not just a negative side of life. You have to be on the positive side of life.


I agree with him. You have to be positive, good things will then happen to you, even if it feels tough. Peter Lynch, fabled investor, says something similar in his "principles" "Unless you're a short seller or a poet looking for a wealthy spouse, it never pays to be pessimistic."




Company corner

Aspen released numbers for their six months to end December this morning. This is a business that has transformed from being a small to major generics business, to now positioning themselves as a (in their words) "global, multinational organisation focused on therapeutic specialties." Anticoagulants (to treat thrombosis) and anesthetics, much of this is new business. This compliments their older businesses, infant nutritional (formula and the like) and lastly the High Potency & Cytotoxics division.

That division is a little more complicated, those therapies treats everything from thyroid conditions to Parkinson's disease, as well as female cancers and hormonal imbalances. And there you thought the business was just a generics company, how the last five years have changed most of that. First Baby formula, and then the European oncology therapy and now becoming a key global participant in hospital procedures and aftercare of patients. i.e. The therapies compliment one another, post operations (where you have to have anesthetic), you need anti coagulants in order to prevent clotting. There is a very *nice* graphic, The Aspen Timeline on their website.

The numbers. Let us take a quick look. Asia Pacific contributes 19 percent to group revenues, South Africa 23 percent and International (Europe, Latin America and North America) 58 percent. Group revenues clocked nearly 20 billion Rand for the first half of the year, up 13 percent from the prior comparable half year. Normalised HEPS increased 6 percent to 692 cents. The dividend has grown quite strongly, still, expect the company to yield less than two percent. One doesn't own the stock for the dividend, you own it for growth. That is why the share price has been more than a little disappointing over the last 18 months, they have been bedding down a number of transactions.

The group has operations in 70 different countries, there are multiple different currency fluctuations that impact on the company earnings. Stephen Saad suggested that they were now looking to report with constant currencies, an international practice. That should make for less volatility. The company thinks that there are many opportunities in emerging markets, as well as making Japan and China big parts of their business. The share price has taken another leg up after having initially traded lower. There are loads of moving parts, and many different "things" going on.




Linkfest, lap it up

I think just like the books that were a fad for a while and then faded away, this concept won't work either - Netflix's interactive storylines will destroy actors - and relationships. Will still be interesting to see what the take up is though by audience and you never know, maybe this type of TV finds a niche.

If your history teacher told you that Edison invented the light bulb, they are wrong. There were at least 23 other people who had invented lightbulbs before him - Innovation Diffusion Lessons from Edison. It is all about execution and a lot less about the idea, here is a bit of history on the light bulb - Who Invented the Light Bulb?

I am always amazed by how awesome the FitBit software is, how the product is quite loved by those that use it, yet by how awful the investment has been. In my mind Apple should just buy FitBit for the software alone, I am pretty sure that they are working on a better version on their side. This is pretty useful for fitness freaks, via the article titled The Sleep Science Behind Fitbit's New Alta HR Fitness Tracker - "There seems to be a strong correlation between your sleep and your runs. The last 10 weeknight logs show that you had 20 mins more restful sleep on days you ran vs. days you didn't."

This graph, courtesy of our old pal Prof Perry is self explanatory - Wednesday evening links, all charts and map edition. These are newspaper jobs in the US, what is interesting to me is that peak newspaper jobs seem to come pre the full scale ramp up of the internet. Do you think that it was 24 hour news TV in the 90's and then the internet from the 2000's? We remain invested in internet businesses that attract more and more advertising, Alphabet, Facebook, Naspers and Amazon.






Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks have started lower here in Jozi, it sounds a little like groundhog day. Resource stocks lower on balance. Europe ... the ECB and inflation. US futures are looking a little worse for wear at the moment.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Wednesday, 8 March 2017

Taking Stock of our GDP

"Interestingly, if you lay a graph of the share price performances of Standard Bank and Nedbank over that of Barlows, they look same-same. Perhaps the stock market, which is forward thinking (you pay today for future profits), is telling you that we are through the worst. Through the worst of the droughts, through the worst of the low commodity prices, through the worst of global politics (maybe debatable that one). There is little that you can do about many factors, much is beyond your control."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks in Jozi ended the day lower, down one quarter of a percent by the close. An economic read pointed to low business confidence, we knew that business confidence was at the lowest level in decades, we had been told that already. Recession or not, it will take something special to get South African companies spending money locally, there is a slow moving bunny and headlights scenario, and I am not too sure which one is policy and which one is business (the bunny and the headlights). Is the economy the stock market and is the stock market the economy? The answer is no. You can read the whole thing here, StatsSA is equipped with good people producing good publications, like this - Gross domestic product - Fourth quarter 2016.

Economic growth has been a stop start affair over the last three years, we have experienced 4 negative quarters out of the last 12. And if the current quarter clocks another downer, i.e. a reversal in GDP (It always sounds strange, negative economic growth), then the technical term is recession. Somehow the standards are so low that "just avoiding" a recession seems like a good thing at the moment.



Manufacturing has been hit particularly hard, experiencing 10 negative quarters over the last 16. Technically we are in a manufacturing recession. And with mining having been so volatile, it looks a little ropey out there too. See the manufacturing graph that we are referring to in the release:



How does that stack up against Barloworld being at a 12 month high? They supply goods and services to these industries? Most of their revenues are from selling equipment and through their automotive business (rentals and motor trading). A couple of sessions ago Nedbank and Standard Bank were trading near 52 week highs too, they provide finance to businesses and consumers. Barlows (as they are affectionately known in the industry) are up nearly 70 percent over the last year, the stock is "only" up 41 percent in five years.

Interestingly, if you lay a graph of the share price performances of Standard Bank and Nedbank over that of Barlows, they look same-same. Perhaps the stock market, which is forward thinking (you pay today for future profits), is telling you that we are through the worst. Through the worst of the droughts, through the worst of the low commodity prices, through the worst of global politics (maybe debatable that one). There is little that you can do about many factors, much is beyond your control. In the end, and I think we can all agree, we should be doing better, if there was stability in politics and leadership stability and accountability, I am pretty sure confidence would be better. And as our colleague Byron said/says, confidence is the best form of stimulus. Look what has happened in the US as an example, consumer confidence hasn't been this high since Intel and Cisco were way cool.




Stocks in New York, New York were lower through the session, by the time the market ended, the Dow sank 0.14 percent, the nerds of NASDAQ sank nearly one-quarter of a percent whilst the broader market S&P 500 lost nearly three-tenths of a percent. Energy, materials and healthcare sank. The Tweet of Trump was at work again, a "wonderful new Healthcare bill" is on the way as well as Trump Sends Pharma Stocks Down With New Tweet on Drug Prices.

Whether or not it passes all the way through remains to be see. In our corner, where we bat for crude capitalism, all we are looking for is lower regulation and tax reforms. That would be good for businesses and by extension profitability and broader society. Or would it? The old trickle down effect?

Snap sank another 10 odd percent, the stock is down nearly a third from their highs intraday on Monday. Everyone is saying, "see, told you so", all of those everyones who didn't get stock in the different rounds earlier. Did you see this story - How US school turned $15,000 into $24m with Snapchat flotation.

Give the governing body of the school free lunch for a year, for agreeing to what would have been a pretty "risky" investment at the time. More specifically, a fellow by the name of Barry Eggers, a parent at the school at the time, and a VC fellow who on his LinkedIn profile says he is a partner and founder at Lightspeed Venture Partners. Who themselves became a shareholder (and rich on paper) in Snap. Research? Seeing how obsessed his kids were with Snap. Interesting, right? Same as Buffett and his Apple investment. Barry actually tells you the story himself via his LinkedIn profile - Five years ago my daughter told me about a new app called Snapchat and the rest is history. You may need to log into your LinkedIn account.

Makes you always think, investing home runs are sometimes under your noise. Mind you, it mattered who the investors were in the VC fund and proximity to the company itself, if this was a VC fund in India, do you think that they would have been able to meet Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy? And equally, if Evan and Bobby were not there (in the US), would they have been able to happen?

"Ten days after meeting Evan and Bobby, we made our seed investment in Snap. Later, we offered them a small space in our building to get going."

Regardless, the fellows over at Lightspeed Venture Partners have done pretty well for themselves, with multiple seeding capital provided for some pretty big ideas that have gone public and become big businesses. According to their Wiki page: "The fund has 24 early stage enterprise investments that have gone public, the most of any fund in the world." Although, who maintains the Wiki page? I still think that Wiki is a good model, fake and erogenous entries are marked as such. Lucky for Lightspeed? Nope, they ask questions it seems and it is more a case of when Barry met Bobby.




Linkfest, lap it up

When your portfolio goes up you think you are a genius, regardless if your share selection was flawed. It is like wining a coin toss 3 times in a row and then thinking you are a good at calling them, other the long term your flaws and wrong assumptions come to the surface. Remember that making a profit or loss in the short term doesn't say anything about how good your investment system is - How Bull Markets Affect Your Intelligence.

Here is another place that having access to the internet helps people. The internet provides information on where/ from whom to get the cheapest product offerings. Due to being poorly informed the more vulnerable in society end up with bad deals - Getting more consumers to switch.

This looks more like stuff out of science fiction, if it didn't come from Airbus, I might say "yeah right". As the article points out, the design of the vehicle is to have a drone "relieve you" of traffic. Wow. Futuristic. Airbus unveils Pop.Up: An autonomous transportation concept that uses drones to carry cars.

From the Geneva automobile show, comes a VW concept car named Sedric, no gears, no steering wheel and the headline says it all - This self-driving van concept from Volkswagen looks like a pissed-off toaster. Inside of ten years I think we will be using these vehicles, I have very little doubt about that.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. It is Women's Day today. Treat the special people in your life extra specially, ok? And make it a daily occurrence, rather than once a year. Treat each other nicely every day, and then we can all just get along. Talking of what day it is, Eddy Elfenbein has a short piece - The Bull Market Turns Eight. On an inflation adjusted basis that hardly seems "huge" now, is it?



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

SNAP, cracking and POP

"The metrics are there, hyperactive and FOMO millennial types making sure that their mates are watching and liking. Who on average check the app 19 times a day, or over once an hour in a normal waking day. Nobody controls the content that people search for, it is the collective that do the searching. Snap is quite simply about visuals, photos and videos. I read yesterday that YouTube has ten times the watched videos over Facebook on a daily basis, we don't think of Google/Alphabet as a videos/movies company though."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Resources, aka materials, took a bit of a pasting yesterday, the stocks as a collective were down over one and three-quarters of a percent here in Jozi. Kumba, Amplats, Glencore and Anglo, all down three percent and more on the day. Was it the Chinese lack of detail or focus on a lower growth rate that was to blame? Perhaps. South32 was ironically at the other end of the spectrum, the best mover and shaker in the ALSI 40, up nearly two and a half percent. There are many times that something happens that you cannot explain. Vodacom and Shoprite made up the other two "winners".

There were a few sets of results on the local front, AVI, the owner of the brands like Freshpak Rooibos and Five Roses Tea (and the fifth one is for you, remember that cheesy ad?), Bakers biscuits and I&J, as well as Spitz and Green Cross shoes, reported numbers that looked about spot on. Growth in snacks and less so in shoes, it makes sense in relation to where we are in the economic cycle. The stock is trading at about their all time high, as is competitor and the one we mostly own, Tiger Brands.

Is AVI cheap? No, not screaming cheap. There is a decent dividend underpin there though, that may always keep the stock at a certain level. I am wondering what companies are likely to do in a higher dividend tax environment, would the shareholders encourage them to hold onto more of the cash, look for deals that make sense? We shall see, the only company to mutter anything of that sort I think was Sibanye. In the end the stock fell by around one-third, less than the market which was off by just over four-tenths of a percent.




Across the oceans and seas, stocks tried hard to gain back the lost ground, after an iffy start, in the end falling flat and short. The Dow Jones lost one-quarter of a percent by the close, the broader market S&P 500 was down by one-third of a percent and the nerds of the NASDAQ were down a little more than that. I did note a few headlines that suggested that Snap Inc. was a "sell" and it was the first day that the stock was down. Sure, they have only had three trading days so far, give the stockholders and company a break.

Talking break, is the crackle after the snap going to end with a pop? Time will tell, when we compared to relative market caps, profitability and revenues, they looked "light". In the end, it is not for Evan Spiegel and his team to worry about being worth double Oprah (at the ripe old age of 26), or whether Snap is three times the market cap of Twitter, it is his job to stick the business on an even keel. At this cash burn rate they will be all out in the next few years. So the team needs growth, rapid growth, and they need the advertisers to come flocking.

The metrics are there, hyperactive and FOMO millennial types making sure that their mates are watching and liking. Who on average check the app 19 times a day, or over once an hour in a normal waking day. Nobody controls the content that people search for, it is the collective that do the searching. Snap is quite simply about visuals, photos and videos. I read yesterday that YouTube has ten times the watched videos over Facebook on a daily basis, we don't think of Google/Alphabet as a videos/movies company though. Snap is a form of entertainment, to get your mates news and gossip (and real news). As well as to post weird and wonderful filters and lenses, vomiting rainbows, flower crowns to friend face swaps. There are risks to this business, for sure, as they say in the prospectus:

    "If we do not develop successful new products or improve existing ones, our business will suffer. We also invest in new lines of business that could fail to attract or retain users or generate revenue. Our business is highly competitive. We face significant competition that we anticipate will continue to intensify. If we are not able to maintain or improve our market share, our business could suffer. We have incurred operating losses in the past, expect to incur operating losses in the future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability."


I suspect that the share price could come under heavy pressure if the selling started on cue, at this point the naysayers are getting louder. I think you just have to know that you own a business that is an advertising platform, and if the advertisers decide that another platform is better, then your product better evolve. For the time being I can see that Instagram have taken the competition very seriously, their product is evolving to keep pace. The hardware is in some cases making this "next level". If people get bored with the entertainment platform (user fatigue), that would be a big problem. For now, Facebook and their 1.86 billion users are having a great time sharing pictures, statuses and videos en masse. In this space we continue to own Facebook as a primary investment. Alphabet and Apple are of course beneficiaries of all these platforms.




Company corner

Luxottica, the eyewear manufacturer, designer and distributor reported results last week. The business is made up of a few parts, the retail outlets you would know well as a customer, the Sunglass Hut, you would also be familiar with their brands if you bought online or at another outlet, Ray-Ban and Oakley, as well as Persol and a couple of others. You might also have worn one of the many licensed eyewear products that they manufacture for many luxury brands, here is a list of some of the brands you can buy at their outlets: Giorgio Armani, Burberry, Bulgari, Chanel, Dolce&Gabbana, Michael Kors, Prada, Ralph Lauren, Tiffany & Co., Versace and Valentino.

There is also another part to the company, their LensCrafters business where they are a global leader in prescription eyewear. There is always an irony for me, as a previous wearer of spectacles (and no doubt future wearer of spectacles), that someone with prescription eyewear is a "four-eyes and a nerd", yet someone with sunnies (essentially the same thing), is cool and hip and with it. How does that work? The mysteries of humanity, sheep thinking and what is cool and not. All I know is that the sunnies protect your eyes against the glare and that spectacles help you see better. As simple as that, they are both helpful.

Sales for the 2016 financial year topped 10 billion Dollars, 10.056 to be more precise, an increase of 2.6 percent on the prior financial year. In Euro terms, sales grew a little over 2.8 percent. Basic earnings per share in Dollars (all that we care about) clocked 1.96 Dollars, an increase of 5.6 percent. The dividend is 50 percent of earnings, and as ADR shareholders, one will get the annual dividend on the last day of May, the equivalent of 92 Euro cents per share, less Italian dividend withholding tax. At nearly 52 Dollars a share, the stock trades on over 26 times earnings. And you and I can plainly see that the growth rates have definitely slowed. Added to that, Italian dividend withholding tax is 26 percent, so the yield pre tax at 1.88 percent is hardly a "steal".

The 2017 outlook is for low to middle single digit sales growth, most of the other metrics "staying the same". The stock reacted negatively, as you can understand. On what is a pretty demanding multiple, the year forward represents few opportunities for shareholders. There is something very different going on in the background, there is a deal pending with a French competitor of a similar size and scale, we wrote about this - Essilor & Luxottica to merge. We are currently not adding to this stock, we are awaiting the outcome of the deal and will assess post that. For the time being, we see little growth here, yet at the same time this is a growth industry.




Linkfest, lap it up

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery but what happens when the imitator becomes the leader? (China's Twitter clone will soon have more users than Twitter) If you had invested in Weibo when it listed in 2014, you would be up 145% now, Twitter on the other hand you are down 62%.

As Naspers shareholders, we all know how great the Tencent investment has been. Here is how it stacks up against other Tech investments - The Startup Investments That Really Paid Off

Infographic: The Startup Investments That Really Paid Off | Statista You will find more statistics at Statista

What?! Not checking email daily is why people get inboxes with 300 unread emails, many are just spam but some are important ones. As smartphones become more prevalent that 18% number should decline - How Often Do You Check Your Inbox?

Infographic: How Often Do You Check Your Inbox? | Statista You will find more statistics at Statista




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks have started mixed here again, it has been tough out there, company cash pots are growing and they are less inclined to invest whilst politically, it looks a little "jaded" and growth rates are very low. Meanwhile, Trump policies are less than clear for the time being, Mr. Market awaits some action. Soon. It may well only be coming in the next few months, although healthcare reforms seem to be coming.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Monday, 6 March 2017

A Chinese growth story

"Debt issues were tackled and growth levels were lowered to 6.5 percent per annum. The pundits were disappointed to see fewer economic reforms. For whatever reason, people see the growth number as "slow", when the base is clearly much higher and bearing in mind that China accounted for 30 percent of all the growth globally last year."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks were mixed Friday in Jozi, financials were up, industrials sank half a percent, resources lost over a percent to send the overall market down just over one-third of a percent. Nedbank was top of the pops, as was Woolies and Old Mutual, Amplats, Kumba and AngloGold Ashanti were not. I suspect that rising interest rates supports the overall appeal for the US Dollar and the excitement around commodity prices wanes a bit, that is the way that the flows gravitate. There was a PMI read for the month of February, six months in a row of expansion, this one was "close", and marginally in the black.

Of course there was an annual meeting of the Chinese top dogs this weekend, where they set the new run rate for the economy, reforms and the like. It is called the "work report" and the delivery by Chinese President, Li Keqiang is delivered to the National People's Congress, the Chinese parliament. Debt issues were tackled and growth levels were lowered to 6.5 percent per annum. The pundits were disappointed to see fewer economic reforms. For whatever reason, people see the growth number as "slow", when the base is clearly much higher and bearing in mind that China accounted for 30 percent of all the growth globally last year.

I found it interesting that the Chinese were looking to shutter steel capacity and cut coal output (China Plans to Cut 500,000 Jobs This Year in Smokestack Sectors), some slow moves toward making the environment better, suggesting that blue skies were also important. Bloomberg had an interesting piece: China Sets Growth Target of About 6.5% Amid Pledges to Ease Risk. That fellow, Tom MacKenzie in the clip at the top of the article was tweeting from the NPC, you can follow him on Twitter - @TomMackenzieTV.

I was interested in some of the photos that he (Tom) took and disseminated, there is a whole English piece of the statement. The one I found most interesting was "Hold high the banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics." Hmmm .... are we not told that their version of parliament is composed of multiple billionaires? See this CNBC report from a few days ago - China's parliament has about 100 billionaires, according to data from the Hurun Report. If the Hurun report is right, then how does that stack up against "Chinese characteristics" for socialism? All people are equal, some are more equal than others however .... ??

It is natural that more and more reforms come to China, the flows will ultimately dictate. Visiting the Hurun Report page on UK Luxury Brands in China Report, there is a paragraph there that makes this economic miracle (not for all) unstoppable:

    "By May of 2016 , the number of millionaires (defined as individuals with personal wealth of CNY 10 million, equivalent to US$1.42 million) in China's 31 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions, apart from Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan reached 1,340,000 - an increase of 130,000 from the previous year, an increase of 10.7%."


The number of millionaires saw an increase of 10.7 percent in an economy that "only" grew by less than 7 percent. Ai shem, sounds like a terrible, horrible no good hard landing to me.

Why is this all important for us? As a commodity exporter, we will know that we cannot always be reliant on the same sort of growth as yesteryear. We are lucky that our economy is not the same as some of the highly commodity exposed economies. In the same way that China need to steer their economy towards services and consumption, away from infrastructure and government, we need more of the first three. Mr. Market is not "unimpressed" with the outcome, I guess for many it is just a talk shop and a pat on the back. Remembering that the communist party has been large and in charge for nearly 70 years now in China, it is a very different country over the nearly seven decades, having gone from substance farming to the second largest economy on the planet.




Across the seas and oceans in New York, New York, stocks eked out a gain after a poor early showing. The Dow Industrials just squeaked into the green, up 0.01 percent by the close. The broader market S&P also just snatched a late winner, up 0.05 percent by the close. The nerds of NASDAQ fared a little better, not by too much, up 0.16 percent by the close. Materials were the strong movers, infrastructure plans to boost commodity prices, albeit against the backdrop of slower Chinese demand. What is equally astonishing is that Goldman Sachs (according to the FT) people smuggled and sent around 1.1 trillion Dollars abroad from China. Words escape me when I heard that number, no wonder property prices in desirable places are sky-rocketing.

Snap Inc. followed their fabulous debut on Thursday with another 10 percent gain Friday, it did come back over two Dollars a share from their highs, someone is down over ten percent already, whilst someone else locked in a 60 odd percent gain from IPO. For the record, Snap Inc. has a market cap of 35 billion Dollars, around the same as Adidas. Bigger than Beiersdorf, the owner of the Nivea, Eucerin, Labello and Elastoplast brands. Call me a sceptic, and perhaps I am way wrong here ..... remembering that the Zuck tried to buy this company a long time ago. I am happy to be proven completely wrong, a company with less than one billion Dollars of turnover and incurring about the same in losses is certainly juiced up to perfection prices.




Linkfest, lap it up

The silver lining to oil spills is that we now better understand our oceans - The BP oil spill led scientists to discover 60 new animal species living in the Gulf of Mexico

Some clever stats people sat down and worked out how long on average the euphoria around an IPO stock lasts. That is, how long is it until "I must own that stock" mixed with limited liquidity starts to fade - Snapchat is still rallying - here's how long it takes on average for a hot IPO to crash. Remember that this is just the average, Facebook went negative basically from day one.



As China has become wealthier, it can afford to focus more on clean energy - China Softens Coal Focus in Bid to Clean Up Its Skies. For context, China plans to cut around 50 gigawatts of coal produced electricity, around the amount Eskom produces a year, that will only remove 4.5% of the coal produced capacity from the system though!




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. US Futures are lower, not by much. French politics looks like we expect, with much flavour and excitement as French people can be. Locally the SASSA "crisis" could come to a head in days, a favourable outcome not necessarily for the taxpayers and treasury, rather the 17 million people who depend on these flows.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Friday, 3 March 2017

Fed Hawks fly

"If consumer confidence is at a 15 year high, then perhaps it is time for the Fed to raise rates and make credit a little more expensive. To take away the proverbial punchbowl before the disco gets out of control."


To market to market to buy a fat pig There is a saying that my late mother used to tell me, she said that there was a Japanese saying that said "tomorrow never comes". Meaning that when you wake up today, it is still tomorrow. I suspect in many languages there are similar sayings, including, why wait for tomorrow to do what you can do today? Markets are always wanting more, wanting some action today, clarity on this and that. Whereas in reality, there are many processes that evolve very slowly.

Including rates and the Fed. I am sure that I have told you this many times, it is always worth sharing. There is a book called It Was a Very Good Year: Extraordinary Moments in Stock Market History. It covers equity market rallies through the ages and deals with the events leading up to those great years. Those years when you have to be invested in equity markets. Those years that you HAVE to just take part in equity markets.

There is a theory around here that as long term investors that you always have to be in the markets. Like ..... always. Nobody knows what will happen next, it is best just to own companies and stay the course. If you have a pattern recognition model on markets, know that no two times are the same, and it is best left to back testing to be 20/20. Tomorrow, we don't know what is likely to happen. Another important part of our job is to act as shock absorbers when markets are tough. And make no mistake, markets have been very tough locally. Quality businesses being buffered in some parts by a very stodgy local economy and a stronger Rand not helping offshore sales at all. Same companies, different environment.

In a phone call yesterday to a client that has been around the block multiple times, we agreed that in times of weakness, companies set themselves up for strength when the tide turns. i.e. Cost cutting and making sure that when top line expansion finally arrives (it almost always does), then you have done all the hard work, margin expansion leads to much higher profits. In-between now and then however, one has to "constructive". And often the best thing to do is to do nothing as a shareholder.

Second point about the book above, the Fed is always spoken about. At length. The Fed this and the Fed that. Punchbowl, this and that. Angst over when rates are going up, excitement when rates come down. Is there anything you can really do about the Fed and their interest rate policies? Like the weather, this is beyond your control. Can you time in and out for the cycles? Perhaps, possibly too hard to do consistently. If consumer confidence is at a 15 year high, then perhaps it is time for the Fed to raise rates and make credit a little more expensive. To take away the proverbial punchbowl before the disco gets out of control. As ever, this is noise in the bigger picture. One looks back in five years time when the rate cycle may have returned to something resembling a "normal" pattern, and rates may be on their way back down.

Quick scoreboard check, seeing as there is plenty to do, at session end the Dow Jones had given up just over half a percent, the broader market S&P 500 had basic materials weigh heavy (down over two percent), whilst the nerds of NASDAQ sank nearly three-quarters of a percent. A pause in the rally and it looks like futures are lower. The biggest news of the day was undoubtably the Snap listing, shares ended up 44 percent on the day, round about where the first trade was. In other words, having IPO'ed at 17, the first trade was more or less that level higher.

I suspect, having watched the process at arms length, that the company may have eked out a little more (and felt the price was too low), it is no used crying over what may, or may not have happened. First piece of Snap - Snap Inc. Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering. Second piece of Snap, 44 percent higher. And as somebody else pointed out, Snap is already worth 2.5 Twitters.

As Twitter pointed out, SpaceX has a market cap of 12 billion Dollars. And lands successfully (after taking off), the most important of the rocket again. It costs 70 million Dollars. The rest of the quote that explains what Snapchat is, goes like this "20 billion Dollar valuation: Rainbow filters." In the end, both companies will be valued on their future profitability and ability to create value for shareholder, existing and exiting and future. The holders, the sellers and the buyers. Am I going to buy Snap any time soon? Nope, I don't think so. First Friday of the month normally signals non-farm payrolls, this one happens to fall too close to the last day of the prior month, so your hyperactive trigger finger is going to have to wait for next week, capiche?


Back home, in Jozi, Jozi, it was a mixed bag, financials rocked, up nearly a percent and a half, courtesy of some better than anticipated results from Standard Bank. That stock flew off the shelves, up over six and a half percent by the close. Nedbank also touched a 12 month high. Both stocks were joined by MTN, which had results that obviously beat expectations. At one stage MTN was up over ten percent, tailing off at the end of the session, still up 8.32 percent by the close. We will have a look at those numbers below. The quarterly update from Steinhoff was obviously dimly viewed by the markets, I did not think that it was that bad at all. Mr. Market sent the stock down nearly 4 percent by the close. Also faring poorly, on what I thought was "ok", was Aspen, down just over two percent.

There was quite a lot of other stuff going on too, the biggest brewer in the world had some average numbers, AB InBev sank over two percent. Brazil, it is still going pretty tough there. That looks in the end like a place that certainly can deliver the goods, it ticks all the Mark Mobius boxes. The generic ones, you know, young population, working off a low base, plenty of natural resources, hard working and so on.

Read this recent piece from a fellow that has now slowed down on the investments front (Mobius), at least from the perspective of full time employment - A Travel Transformation in Emerging Markets. I like Mobius, he is a cheerful soul with lots of optimism. You got to love that. So Brazil will be fine too in the end (as will China), whether or not beer volumes can grow a vast amount (how much can more people consume?) remains to be seen. In the end, stocks as a collective had managed a four-tenths of a percent.


Company corner

MTN had results yesterday. I guess the share price reaction tells you a lot about what the market thought, the stock definitely outpaced expectations, if you think that is important. It is at some level. The stock has disappointed bitterly after a period of sublime growth through the last decade, adding tons of customers and making sure that they were building out a continental champion, a brand that is well recognised alongside other multinationals, such as Coke. They are really that big in some territories. Michael is not a fan of MTN investor relations. I can see why, the presentation is still not up, the one from yesterday. That is, how should we say ..... not good. I sent a tweet to the MTNGroup handle, awaiting a reply.

So we shall have to do with the sheets and the emails, rather than the glossies. So here are the highlights and lowlights of the year. Revenues were flat, voice traffic fell (down 1,7 percent) whilst data traffic (up 143 percent) continues to become a much bigger part of overall revenues, 39.5 billion out of 146.9 billion Rand. The company managed to repatriate 6.3 billion Rand from Iran, which as they point out is "the entire amount due under the loan advanced for the licence fee in 2005." Group Capex was an astonishing 34.9 billion Rand, around 11 billion Rand spent here. Consumers are always demanding better services from their networks, this is a rather large amount to continually spend.

The reason for the positive reaction is simple. Last year, as they point out, was the worst in their 22 year history. Politics, economic factors beyond their control, and of course the big fine in Nigeria, as well as interruptions in that territory (which they refer to as material regulatory factors). Things in Nigeria have improved in the last quarter. I wonder what this recent bout of xenophobic attacks are likely to have on their business, it is one of the unknowns. I see that Nigeria are sending, or looking to send a delegation, to South Africa, that may include the foreign minister. This is a good thing to ease the tensions, incorrect rhetoric to the foreign community is not helpful for anyone. It is no different to Trump acting against others. No different.

The company took a 31 percent hit in EBITDA as a result of the Nigerian fine, fees associated with that fine, MTN Zakhele Futhi share-based payment expense, the writing off of a large portion of their South Sudan business (as a result of civil war). The fine itself had a 500 cent impact on HEPS. There was another 329 cents in forex loses. There were several other "issues" which lead to a 77 cent loss in basic headline earnings per share. Notwithstanding the accounting (and other real) losses, the group managed to declare a 450 cent dividend, bringing the total dividend to the year at 7 Rand. After tax of 20 percent (now), that equates to a four and a half percent yield. After tax. Vodacom, on the same basis have a historic yield of 4.3 percent post tax. Telkom is less than half of that. That is the simple reason the stock surged, IMO.

Another simple question, is the thesis still intact? Forget the oil price and regulatory issues, past, present or even future. The company has spent, and will spend a total of 100 billion Rand in infrastructure development over the last two and present financial year. Roughly one-third here in South Africa. Telkom has a market cap of 35 billion Rand, MTN will invest that in around three years in South Africa. Nigeria. That was supposed to be a country with great commodity wealth with a young and dynamic population. That part still exists.

In fact, I saw the Dangote Cement results the other day, the company operates in ten countries across the continent, including Nigeria as their home base. Dangote Cement reported cement volumes in Nigeria that were 11.1 percent higher than the prior year, raising their market share at the same time. Sales in the second half of the year were weaker than the year prior. The annual results also suggest that the countries economy contracted by 1.7 percent, according to the world bank.

Why is this at all important? If cement sales are a pointer to fixed capital formation increasing markedly, that indicates that at least the consumer is feeling a whole lot better than government finances, which are reliant on oil revenues, one should view this as a positive for all businesses operating in this territory. It is no secret that the current political dispensation in Nigeria, which was elected on a ticket of fighting corruption and growing the economy may have disappointed. Equally, in another of their territories that is key to growth, Iran, the weak relationship with the US is more than a little unsettling. There, in Iran, the economy has recovered smartly, as a result of capturing the higher oil prices.

MTN will be key in the data revolution across the continent, being able to deliver content to hungry customers with hungrier handsets. Music, movies, gaming and other sorts of entertainment, as we have seen in China and other countries and territories that have emerged from "developing" status, take on higher consumption. A phone and data is a form of freedom. Freedoms for watching, listening and learning. Whilst the numbers have been disappointing, the new management team inherit a structurally wobbly house in a good location. We continue to hold, we like the recent momentum with the existing business and continue to hold, the next year is certainly going to be one of rebuilding and continued infrastructure spend.


Linkfest, lap it up

There has been a little bit of a stink about ticket prices and the Soweto derby, tomorrow. See -> Kaizer Chiefs defend Soweto derby ticket prize hike. Surely it is about simple economics? 70 Rand might mean a lot or a little for tickets to watch the biggest derby in these parts. For the record, an El Classico ticket (between Barca and Real Madrid) costs close to 6500 to 7000 Rand (I checked myself on Viagogo). That is around 100 times more, to watch Messi and Ronaldo. Spain PPP Dollars = 32 thousand per annum. South Africa? Around 22 percent of Spain. What are your thoughts?

The big argument against high taxes and a big government is that the government is inefficient in operating and in the allocation of resources. Denmark is looking to cut their eye watering high 60.2% income tax - Welfare Icon Now Wants People to Take Care of Themselves

There are very few people, that when they talk the financial community listens. Howard Marks is one of those people and he also writes regular letters to his investors, just like Buffett - Howard Marks on What Matters Most

This dovetails nicely with our piece about communism from yesterday - Don't demonise capitalism - it's making the world a better place. This article, that suffers from Afropessimism, makes the point that since 1960, the gap has widened between the free market system in the USA and Sub Saharan Africa. They (the US) did have a twenty mile head-start though. It can be said that capitalism is still a superior system for populations.

How badly damaged have the banks been since the financial crisis? Some would argue not enough. This number looks like a giant pile to me, shareholders of banks have had to pick up the tab. From Bloomberg - World's Biggest Banks Fined $321 Billion Since Financial Crisis.


Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Iron ore prices are all fall tumbling down. The global rally seems to have run into a few obstacles, it was bound to happen at some level. Onwards sportslovers!



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Thursday, 2 March 2017

Less becomes more

"to borrow the words of Marc Anthony, things have gotten over complicated. Complication stifles growth. Complication stifles the human spirit, which just wants to be set straight on a path to prosperity."




To market to market to buy a fat pig What a ripper. The Dow Jones Industrial clocked through 21 thousand points and then ripped even higher than that. Up nearly one and a half percent by the session end, 21115 is the new level for blue chips. The broader market S&P 500 also touched an all time high, up 1.37 percent to 2395. Yip, it was definitely an incredible session. The nerds of NASDAQ added just over a percent and one-third, over 5900 points by the end of the session. Apple touched an all time high, the biggest company in the world had a market cap of 733 billion Dollars by the close. Still a long, long way to go to "get there". Berkshire added nearly three and a half percent. Financials and basic materials were the biggest sector gainers on the day, utilities were the only major loser.

What gives? Why the huge rally of herculean proportions? What changed? In practice ....... nothing changed. In theory, from the Trump address to Congress the session earlier, everything changed. Changes pending in everything from simplifying the tax code, long overdue, to infrastructure development, also long overdue. And less regulatory hurdles to overcome, even Buffett reckoned, ".... and Buffett is a reasonable man", to borrow the words of Marc Anthony, things have gotten over complicated. Complication stifles growth. Complication stifles the human spirit, which just wants to be set straight on a path to prosperity. In many ways, having the system that the US has is favourable for the risk taker, that sort of behaviour has always been encouraged. There was a snippet I recalled suddenly from the Buffett letter over the weekend, that spoke about asset transfer, it went like this:

    'It's true, of course, that American owners of homes, autos and other assets have often borrowed heavily to finance their purchases. If an owner defaults, however, his or her asset does not disappear or lose its usefulness. Rather, ownership customarily passes to an American lending institution that then disposes of it to an American buyer. Our nation's wealth remains intact. As Gertrude Stein put it, "Money is always there, but the pockets change."'


That is the way that it works with the American system, land of the free and all that. Then I recalled a story of a fixed income fellow that kept a Russian Imperial note issued by the Royal Treasury (pre-revolution) that was worthless when the communists took over. Worth zero. Zip, nil. Nothing. Lutho. Equally, the stock market became worthless in late 1917 in Russia. The same happened in China in 1949. Did you know that the Russian Famine of 1921 killed 5 million people? Another one in 1932-1933 killed 7 to 10 million people. Another one in 1947 killed one to one and a half million people. In China, between 1959-1961, it is estimated that around 43 million (max) people died of starvation then.

So communism in the 20th century killed around the same population as we have here, Statistician General, Pali Lehohla said we had 55 million people at the end of 2015 (just the other day), we have around 57 now, from what I could understand on the wireless. So that is communism. The destroyer of capital and a starvation method, responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Capitalism, it may not be the most perfect system, that leaves many people behind, it sure is a far better alternative. In communism that same asset goes to the state, there is no incentive to improve and effectively all the capital that is sunk into the asset goes to zero. Destroyer of capital, and by extension, taking humanity backwards.

On the other hand, if someone takes an asset off another, as a result of affordability, they can make more use at that point. And create more economic value. And more opportunities in the broader economy, creating jobs. Cycle repeats, even when the assets are a dog for one person, they may be a "gold mine" for another. Although, as they say in the classics, it is the people who make picks and spades that make the money during a mining boom. Trump rally, YUGE or not, sustainable or not, will have to be backed up with substance and I really do think that DC is ready to tackle these issues. If nothing else, Trump has ruffled enough feathers for the collective to know that action is needed. Joe Weisenthal (now at Bloomberg), had this tweet that is interesting at some level.






Locally, stocks rallied over a percent into the close. Resources were the winners on the day, up nearly two and a half percent. There was a new 12 month high for Nedbank, the company had reported numbers that were welcomed by the market, this morning was the turn of Standard Bank, results that comfortably beat market consensus. I expect the stock (Standard Bank) to act favourably. South32, BHP, Glencore, Kumba and Anglo were all top of the pops on the leaderboard, MTN and AngloGold Ashanti at the other end of the spectrum, the board nobody wants to be on.

Aspen had a trading update head of their numbers in a week today time, quite a number of moving parts in there, including significant variations between normalised earnings per share and earnings per share. It looked light at some level, the stock is lower. MTN had results today, although at face value they look "bad", the market has responded favourably. We will do a write up on MTN in the coming days.




Linkfest, lap it up

If you have been around the stock market for any period of time you would have heard the terms "going short" or "short interest" or even "short squeeze". For many people the dynamics of shorting are a mystery, here is an infographic breaking it down for you - Is Short Selling Stocks Worth It?.

The recent strong moves in the market highlight why being invested instead of on the sidelines generally works out better for you - Proudly Permabullish

Netflix is building their moat, between them and the competition - Netflix's new AI tweaks each scene individually to make video look good even on slow internet.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Snap is listing today, lovely to be young! Are you a user? The platform certainly has multiple eyeballs, the analyst community is mixed on this investment, all that matters in the end is if the advertisers come to the platform. I am not an active user of Snapchat, it is "difficult" for me to navigate my way around. Bright nailed it, he said, it is like tabloid meets technology.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Bigger than Naspers

"The stock price is around 1700 Dollars a share. Not surprisingly, the stock is up nearly 3000 percent in ten years. What? Yes, the company now has a market capitalisation in excess of 80 billion Dollars. It may well be the biggest holding company that you have never heard of. In fact, the market cap is bigger than Naspers, quite a lot bigger in fact. The company has delivered compounded gross profit growth rates over the last five years of 35 percent."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks in Jozi were lower by the close, down over two-thirds as a collective, resource stocks and specifically gold miners were looking a little worse for wear. Down over three and on-quarter of a percent as a collective they were, gold stocks. There were spits and spots of green, some of the Rand hedges benefitting from a weakening Rand environment. Hammerson, BATS and Mediclinic at the top of the leaderboard, at the opposite end of the spectrum was Redefine, AngloGold Ashanti and Amplats. There were results from the JSE themselves, they certainly looked decent enough to me. Over ten years that stock is up 190 percent. Amazing, not so? Still, the market capitalisation is "only" 14 billion Rand, Famous Brands by comparison is 15 and a half billion Rand. Chips and burgers trump derivatives and options. Not really, you know what I mean.

Bidvest slid another five percent, since their (and Bidcorp) results there has certainly been a pretty big divergence between the two. The lower growth environment here in South Africa is not really "helpful" for Bidvest. They are more than a good company, whether or not they are correctly priced at 23 odd times earnings, I am not convinced. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it is a screaming sell, there are better options out there for my mind. Talking of which, Steinhoff had a quarterly trading update that "looked good" at face value. See below in the company segment.




It wasn't to be, the Dow Jones industrial average did not make it 13 in a row, which would have tied the record for most days up in a row. Stocks slipped marginally in New York, New York, the broader market S&P 500 fell one-quarter of a percent. The nerds of NASDAQ slipped nearly two-thirds of a percent. Target was flamed, the stock was down over 12 percent after weak numbers and weak guidance. The stock looks cheaper, it may well get cheaper. Other retailers sank in sympathy. Hey, Amazon Web Services were out last evening, that caused a few flutters and reminded us that even the best doesn't work all of the time.




Company corner

Steinhoff numbers yesterday morning (and afternoon), this was for the quarter ending December 2016. This is a 300 billion Rand market cap business, sizeable indeed. Of course the business is now listed in the Frankfurt, this is the secondary listing down here. I think that access to cheaper capital and growth in emerging market (as well as looking for opportunities in developed markets) is more important.

Their listing there, with the backing of big German institutional money makes for favourable reading, from a funding point of view. That is what I think when they made the comment that shares in issue had been stable, I suspect that it will stay that way. There is a *nice* colourful slide for us to use here:



That pretty much sums up the business right there. What Steinhoff have done well over the last half a decade is realise that in the space that they operate in, there were cheap assets that nobody else wanted at the time. They recognised that after the financial crisis there were opportunities that may have only presented themselves once in a decade, or generation for that matter. Through the bumbling of the European sovereign issues, the company found a foothold in Europe and will continue to build on their huge base.

Be patient here, I know that the share price has not rewarded you over the last year (down 20 percent). It looks cheap at these levels and is showing signs of "bedding down" (no pun intended) their recent acquisitions. The risk of course is that they enter "a deal too far" territory. Beds and sofas, kettles and white goods are certainly not the most appealing and dynamic products, that is for sure. We continue to add to the stock of a company that we think has a dynamic and quality management team, searching for perfection.




Priceline presented numbers for their fourth quarter and full year to end December, close of business Monday. For the full year, the group had gross travel bookings (total dollar value, generally inclusive of all taxes and fees, of all travel services purchased by its customers, net of cancellations) of 68.1 billion Dollars, 23.1 percent better than the prior year. Gross profit was 10.3 billion Dollars, 20 percent better than the year prior. Non-GAAP income grew 23 percent to 3.3 billion Dollars, per diluted share, non-GAAP net income was 65.63 Dollars. Yes, per share, there are only 49 million odd shares (13 million too in treasury, what!!) in issue.

Net income per diluted share was 14 percent lower to 42.65 Dollars. Reason being that Priceline took a non-cash charge in the 3rd quarter related to OpenTable, a business they bought for 2.6 billion Dollars in 2014. 941 million Dollars, gulp. Shouldn't have paid that premium!

The stock price is around 1700 Dollars a share. Not surprisingly, the stock is up nearly 3000 percent in ten years. What? Yes, the company now has a market capitalisation in excess of 80 billion Dollars. It may well be the biggest holding company that you have never heard of. In fact, the market cap is bigger than Naspers, quite a lot bigger in fact. The company has delivered compounded gross profit growth rates over the last five years of 35 percent. Incredible.

In case you were wondering who and what this massive business is, you know their Booking.com platform (Michael said he wasn't too familiar with it until he bought the share, I almost fell off my chair), they have multiple others, priceline.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, Rentalcars.com and OpenTable. You may have used some, I have. I couldn't find a rental once, I used priceline.com directly, it worked perfectly. Except I forgot my drivers licence at home, that is another story! This business is very valuable for all the stakeholders in the tourism industry, they have the ability to connect the dots better than ever. Ever old traditional insiders (travel agents) have their own platforms, enabling them to have a wider scope than before.

As per the annual report: "As of December 31, 2016, Booking.com offered accommodation reservation services for over 1,115,000 properties in over 220 countries and territories on its various websites and in over 40 languages, which includes over 568,000 vacation rental properties ... Vacation rentals generally consist of, among others, properties categorized as single-unit and multi-unit villas, apartments, "aparthotels" (which are apartments with a front desk and cleaning service) and chalets which are generally self-catered (i.e., include a kitchen), directly bookable properties."

In other words, people would be willing to advertise on both AirBNB and Booking.com, as far as I understand it, there is no exclusivity. Interestingly, the company lists their competitors as Google, Apple, Alibaba, Tencent, Amazon and Facebook, and then a whole lot more, from TripAdvisor to Marriott International, Hilton and Hyatt Hotels. They also list Lyft, Uber and Didi Chuxing, in the cars space. So there is a lot of seasonality to their business, and there are multiple competitors too. They do own some great brands and try and keep at the forefront of technological advances in travel.

There is another sentence that makes you wonder if humanity is ever going to advance, these are broad based risks that could impact on any business: "In addition, other unforeseen events beyond our control, such as worldwide recession, oil prices, terrorist attacks, unusual or extreme weather or natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, floods, droughts and volcanic eruptions, travel-related health concerns including pandemics and epidemics such as Ebola, Zika, Influenza H1N1, avian bird flu, SARS and MERS, political instability, regional hostilities, imposition of taxes or surcharges by regulatory authorities, changes in trade or immigration policies or travel-related accidents, can disrupt travel or otherwise result in declines in travel demand."

Wow. Reach for the pills.

The company stuck out a guidance that seems to have been below the market expectations, remembering that this is the 1st quarter. In other words, not the holiday season, that comes in the second half of the year, July through to December:



The stock rallied hard, up over five percent to another all time high of 1725 Dollars a share. The stock trades on 40 times earnings, it is hardly cheap. What the company has going for them is the shift to experiences over things. i.e. People want to spend their money to see the Taj Mahal, the Eiffel Tower, the Statue of Liberty and all of the other amazing places around the world, over "things". Although, I get that they must still have the latest technology in order to take the pics and selfies. There is plenty of growth left here in order to justify even accumulating the stock at these levels, remembering that they may display volatile price action on such a high rating (November 2015 Paris attacks, the stock got hammered).

Notwithstanding what are always headwinds that humanity faces (mostly made by themselves), there are more people with more resources that want to see the rest of the world, experience different cultures and eat different authentic food. I suspect that we may only be scratching the surface globally with this travel trend. We stay the course here.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks across Asia are better than yesterday, US stock futures are better than before the Trump speech, which look short on substance. Mind you, give me a speech that contains all that and we would probably fall asleep having to listen to it.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063