Showing posts with label JNJ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JNJ. Show all posts

Friday, 2 February 2018

Swipechain


To market to market to buy a fat pig. Phew, we survived super earnings Thursday. Given their huge growth rates, coupled with high expectations, tech stocks are always the most exciting earning events. It has been known to happen where a tech stock, particularly those belonging to 'FANG', can rocket 20% or slump 20% after reporting. Here is how they did compared to analyst expectations:

- Apple beat on revenue and on earnings, stock is up 3.4%
- Alphabet beat on revenue, but missed on earnings, stock is down 2.2%
- Amazon beat on revenue and a strong beat on earnings, stock is up 6.3%
- Amgen missed on revenue and on earnings, stock is down 1.7%
- Alibaba beat on revenue but missed on earnings, stock is down 6%
- Visa beat on revenue and on earnings, stock is down 1.1% (sometimes you can 'beat' and still disappoint the market)

Over the last few weeks, there have been concerns about the number of iPhone X's sold. I read a comment where one user was asking if they are going to stop producing the phone because of weak sales. I think this tweet sums up the iPhone X and Apple in general.



Market Scorecard. It was a red day for most markets yesterday and an even worse day for Bitcoin. Byron joked in the office saying that the 2% drop in Bidcorp, is out of sympathy for the 15% drop in the Bitcoin price. The Dow was up 0.14%, the S&P 500 was down 0.06%, the Nasdaq was down 0.35%, and the All-share was down 0.42%




Company Corner

Byron's Beats

I get the hype around Bitcoin and blockchain technology. The notion of an unregulated, fee free, community-based network sounds great. The problem is people will always misbehave. It is human nature. Even more importantly, governments need to track payments so that they can gather taxes. No one likes paying taxes, but they are very necessary. Yesterday India expressed a will to regulate cryptocurrencies. Can you blame them? They have been working exceptionally hard to eradicate a cash based society in order to track payments and raise taxes. If Bitcoin went mainstream with no regulation, then that would have been in vain.

Visa reported earnings last night which looked fantastic. In a way, Visa aims to achieve the same goals as cryptocurrencies. They provide an easy, trustworthy and efficient medium of exchange. Of course they do not do it for free. But why should they? They are offering an exceptionally useful product. The difference here is that regulators love Visa! Swiping plastic can be tracked through the banks. Tax evasion is bad for economies and most notably, the vulnerable people in society. Governments ability to track payments is a good thing.

Ok, let's look at the Q1 numbers. Net revenues grew 9% driven by strong international revenue. Total payment volume increased 12.4% in constant currencies to a whopping $2.030 trillion. International (outside the US) grew volumes by 15.2%. This is good news as the developing markets start adopting plastic transactions. The picture below shows how many transactions took place using Visa cards and with what cards.



Earnings came in at $1.08, well ahead of expectations. The company expects earnings for the full year to increase by more than 20%, helped by a $7.5bn share buyback program. Earnings for the full year are expected to come in at $4.40. The stock trades at 28 times earnings which may sound expensive but remember they have operating margins of 68% and are growing earnings north of 20% per annum.

There are so many tailwinds for this business. I already mentioned the regulatory environment but consider the changes in the way we consume. Uber, online retail, app-based rewards programs, music streaming services, video streaming. They all support credit card payments. We continue to add to Visa as a core Vestact holding.




Michael's Musings

Last week, Johnson & Johnson released their 4Q and FY numbers, beating market expectations. One of the reasons why I love the company as an investment is because it is basically three companies in one. Investment bankers have been licking their lips at the prospect of breaking the company up, arguing it unlocks value for the shareholder. A breakup probably will add value in the short term, over time though I think having a strong brand and some diversification across sectors is more important. Here is a breakdown of the company:



Reading through all of their brands and the therapies that they own, you realise how huge this company is. Unlike something like Alphabet, where over 90% of profits come from one product, JnJ has many products in different life stages. For example their diabetes division had 16% lower sales due to increased competition, but the electrophysiology and atrial fibrillation divisions registered growth of 20% and 13%, respectively.

Diversity is what you want in a healthcare company. One day you could wake up to find that your drug does more harm than good, not good if you are a 'one trick pony'. Due to JnJ's size and diversity, the stock is not going to shoot the lights out. Over the last 10-years the stock is 'only' up 120%, Amazon is up by more in less than 2-years. With that size and diversity comes strong cash flows. JnJ boasts a record of increasing their dividend every year for 55-years! We think this is a great anchor stock for your portfolio.




Linkfest, lap it up

One thing, from Paul

This week on Blunders: What really happened at Steinhoff, China spying in Africa, airlines have had it with your "emotional support" animal, and Volkswagen hit by Dieselgate 2. - Blunders - Episode 86




Vestact in the Media

Michael chatted to The Eusebius McKaiser Show on 702 about Capitec - [LISTEN] 'More research needs to be done into allegations against Capitec'.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Not so highly anticipated non-farm payrolls are released this evening, US unemployment is expected to stay at 4.1%. During the financial crisis, this data was huge. It indicated how bad things were, and then how quickly things were recovering. Enjoy the weekend, hopefully the Proteas can return to winning ways at Centurion on Sunday.




Sent to you by Team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Friday, 27 October 2017

This Elephant can Dance


To market to market to buy a fat pig. Earnings galore coming from the US. What a time to be alive! Not because companies are releasing earnings, they do that every quarter. But because the earnings coming through are looking fantastic. Alphabet (Google) grew sales by 24% off a massive base. This equated to operating income of $8.8bn for the quarter. Just phenomenal. That stock is up 3% on the news

Amazon also reported cracking numbers. Revenues grew 33.7% to $43.7bn. Wholefoods contributed $1.3bn of that. People are loving their cheaper avos. The Amazon share price soared 8% on the numbers.

The Vestact brains trust will be working hard to get these numbers to you in more detail throughout next week.

Unfortunately south of the Limpopo, things are not looking as upbeat. We can no longer blame slow global growth for our woes. In fact, if things were bad globally we would be in a lot more trouble. The Rand got klapped. There is no other better way to explain it. We are now at R14.25 to the dollar.

Market Scorecard As you know, the market doesn't mind a weaker Rand. The all share closed 0.8% thanks to many of the larger dual listed stocks having a good run. SA inc stocks like the banks and retailers did not fair as well. In New York the S&P increased 0.1%. Those big moves mentioned above happened after the close, they will impact positively on today's open.




Company corner

Bright's Banter

- $30 Billion acquisition of Actelion was successful and benefits are flowing in already.
- Completed the sale of Codman to Integre for over $1 Billion.
- Janssen Pharma has been busy getting clearance for new drugs and acquiring new businesses.
- JNJ declared a $0.84 dividend.


JnJ shares were up 2% after the company posted another strong quarter. This was thanks to the strong performance by the pharmaceuticals business and the Actelion acquisition as well as other small recent acquisitions. JnJ also had a few sales of non-strategic businesses within the JnJ portfolio.

How did the company do compared to Wall Street's expectations?

1) Third-Quarter Sales of $19.7billion an increase of 10.3% which was a $370m beat
2) Third-Quarter Earnings Per Share was $1.37
3) Adjusted Third-Quarter Earnings Per Share of $1.90 an increase of 13.1% which beat expectations by $0.10

The consumer business did fairly with $3.4 Billion in Sales for the quarter, showing an increase of 2.9% with the most growth coming from non-U.S. sales. Baby care products took a hit but that impact was not felt much because the portfolio is well spread out. OTC products like Tylenol, an analgesic product, international smoking cessation aids, OGX, and Neutrogena beauty products continued to perform well in their categories.

Pharmaceuticals business was by far the biggest winner. During the quarter JnJ sold their brand Compeed to HRA Pharma. Pharma sales were up 15.4% to $9.7 Billion where Actelion contributed 7.9%. Strong growth came from the sale of new drugs such as Darzalex which treats patients with multiple myeloma and Imbruvica which is an oral treatment for certain B-Cell malignancies, a type of blood cancer. Other drugs that contributed to the growth were Stelara, Xarelto, Zytiga, Invega, Sustenna etc. These drugs treat everything from immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, metastatic cancer, prostate cancer, all the way to schizophrenia.

The medical devices business was another strong performer with Sales of $6.6 Billion for the quarter, an increase of 7.1%. Both U.S. and non-U.S. markets growing at 4.6% and 9.6% respectively. The growth in this portfolio was driven by the electrophysiology products in the Cardiovascular (heart related) business and Acuvue which is the contact lenses brand in Vision Care business.

The company acquired TearScience a company that manufactures products dedicated to meibomian gland dysfunction, and Sightbox which is an e-commerce business that makes vision care affordable by providing a subscription service that connects consumers with eye care professionals for their contact lens needs.

We like JnJ here at Vestact as an anchor position for our offshore portfolios. We think this giant still has legs to run; especially the Pharma and Medical Devices businesses. This Elephant can dance baby!

Linkfest, lap it up

One thing, from Paul

Vestact's most recent investment recommendation for SA portfolios was private education group AdvTech. They are a very promising business, with solid assets in both secondary schooling and the tertiary sector (colleges and universities). Remember that a tiny fraction of school goers and undergraduates in South Africa attend private institutions, but that is set to grow. State-run schools and universities are taking strain!

Private educational institutions are at the forefront of adopting internet technology to supplement in-class activities. Online lectures, assignment management systems and web-based examination processes are proliferating. Are 100% online courses the way to go? Certainly, not having to build a campus upfront is a massive capital saving!

Not so fast. This article from the Brookings Institute was based on a study at Stanford University. They found that in a large, for-profit college, online courses are a poor option for the least well-prepared students. Online students did substantially worse than students in the same face-to-face course: They earned lower grades, were less likely to succeed in subsequent courses, and more likely to drop out. Clever kids, of course, did well and liked not having to go to lectures - Who Should Take Online Courses




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks in Asia are up this morning after the good results coming through from the US. Remember that these US businesses are global. We have had a muted start. The Rand hedges still looking solid.




Sent to you by Team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Friday, 21 July 2017

Big Johnson

"He (Robert Johnson) went into business with a fellow called Seabury, back in 1873, selling medicated plasters. In other words, the precursor to the bandaid. In a few short years they were a global business, Robert promptly went to the World Fair in Philadelphia in 1876, where a large gathering of doctors (the biggest in US history) heard of the business more widely than before."




To market to market to buy a fat pig That was kind of unexpected. The Reserve Bank governor and the Monetary Policy committee team surprised the market with a 25 basis point cut in the repurchase rate, effective from this morning. I wondered what tough job these folks had taken, the fact that they are willing to stick their neck out in a very "fluid" environment and what that means. I suspect it doesn't matter where you are in the world, being a central banker is a tough old task. Anyhows, here is the - Statement of the MPC, which includes the reasoning behind (four votes for and two votes for no change) the 25 basis point rate cut, to 6.75 percent. An "improved inflation outlook and the deteriorated growth outlook", you knew that though.

The SARB in their expectations sees low growth and moderating inflation through 2019. They see core inflation below 5 percent, which may well give them room to manoeuvre more, should that base case stay the same. Confidence is out of their control, as is the political landscape, both those are linked currently. A return in confidence would be the best kind of stimulus that this economy needed, I suspect that for many businesses, December (16-20) and the ANC National conference couldn't come quick enough.

The upshot of it all was definitely a market caught off guard. The Rand weakened - yields lower, marginally less attractive, weaker economic outlook - which boosted the market somewhat. Equally, consumer sensitive stocks were boosted, at the top of the majors were the likes of Woolies and Tiger Brands. The stocks in the negative column included the likes of Anglo American and Amplats. Vodacom was also there, notwithstanding what looked like a decent quarterly update. We will look into that one in a bit.

Session end the Jozi all share index had rallied over one-third of a percent, financials added six-tenths, whilst resource stocks lagged, draining the last close by two-thirds of a percent. There were new 12 month highs for the likes of Discovery, Clicks and Vodacom (before the stock turned tail), there was a new 12 month print for AngloGold. We are back at levels not seen since May this year, and first seen in May 2015. It has certainly been a tough old slog out there.




Stocks in New York, New York closed the session mixed, another score for the nerds of NASDAQ, that index up marginally, just shy of one-tenth of a percent. The broader market S&P 500 lost one-fiftieth of a percent, they may as well of stayed at home. The Dow Industrial Average closed the session out a little more than one-tenth of a percent lower. Microsoft and Visa reported numbers post the market, for Bill Gates' empire the stock first popped and then settled a little lower, the conversion to the cloud based environment has worked really well for Microsoft. And of course their users, who get to benefit from being anywhere and having the ability to login and enjoy their files and emails.

Visa reported numbers after-hours, the stock ticked up a little after what was a pretty good beat in expectations, the stock is nearly at 100 bucks, can you believe that? Since the company has been a seperately listed entity, it is up nearly six-fold, in less than ten years. We will take a more detailed review and then revert in the coming days, normally the overwhelming feeling is this business is a long term hold. Electronic transactions are going to replace cash and checks (cheques).




Company Corner

Johnson & Johnson or JNJ if you like, reported numbers for their 2nd quarter of their 2017 financial year earlier this week. The history of any business always fascinates me, in this case there were three brothers (obviously called Johnson), the eldest became a pharmacist and went to NYC to start a career as a drug salesman. He (Robert Johnson) went into business with a fellow called Seabury, back in 1873, selling medicated plasters. In other words, the precursor to the bandaid.

In a few short years they were a global business, Robert promptly went to the World Fair in Philadelphia in 1876, where a large gathering of doctors (the biggest in US history) heard of the business more widely than before. It was there that Robert Johnson learnt about antiseptic surgery (from Dr. Joseph Lister), and was taken with the idea. Not all were struck with that, it was a long time ago, remember. 10 odd years later, Robert teamed up with his younger brothers, James and Edward Mead to form JNJ. Making what? Mass produced sterile surgical supplies. Treated gauze made infection less likely, remember that this was a time before antibiotics.

Today the company is synonymous with health and well-being, some of the products are part of many middle income households across the globe, the company estimates that their company touches the lives of a billion people a day. Many of the products find their space inside of hospitals and medical centres, they have three distinct and separate businesses. Whilst we often associate the billions in use with the technology companies, this business certainly has the reputation and history to continue to advance medical science for the better of their customers. And their shareholders, JNJ have increased their dividend payment every single year for 54 years. Forget all the stock market and economic gyrations in-between, the company has still delivered to their shareholders.

Their three businesses consist of the following, firstly the consumer segment, which is the best known of the lot, brands include Listerine, Neutrogena, Pepcid, Clean & Clear, Stayfree, Carefree and of course Band-Aid. Then there are other brands like Tylenol and Sudafed, over the counter drugs that are well known globally. Who hasn't used JNJ products when they had (or were) kids? In their Pharma division, the biggest of the lot, there are five key segments, immunology, infectious diseases and vaccines, neuroscience, oncology and cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The Medical Devices segment is a competitor to another recommended stock, being Stryker. All sorts, a copy and paste from the annual report: "products used in the orthopaedic, surgery, cardiovascular, diabetes care and vision care fields."

Here is a breakdown of their sales by region and segment:



The business is basically more than half the US, and mostly pharma at that. There has been calls over the years to unbundle or break the business up into the separate entities, to "unlock" shareholder value. We think that the business is better together, steadier and stronger, less volatile. JNJ also has a strong pipeline of 10 new products by 2019 (each expecting sales of 1 billion Dollars plus), as well as an additional 40 "line extensions" by that date too (10 of which will potentially have sales of 500 million each). I suspect that even though many consider the business "boring" and less exciting than some of the other biotechnology sector, there is a LOT to be said for "steady".

The company also updated their guidance: "The Company increased its sales guidance for the full-year 2017 to $75.8 billion to $76.1 billion. Additionally, the Company increased its adjusted earnings guidance for full-year 2017 to $7.12 - $7.22 per share." So where does that leave us, from a valuations point of view? The share price is roughly 135 Dollars. With those earnings, the stock trades on 18.7x at the top end of the range. The dividend is 84 cents a quarter, pre-tax that equates to just shy of 2.5 percent. It is neither cheap, nor is it expensive, Goldilocks obviously washes her hair with the Johnson's baby (golden) shampoo, no more tears.

It is always a good time to own this business. Their unblemished track record is something that they are no doubt very proud of, and perhaps the envy of their peers. If you are looking for the blue in blue chip, look no further.




Linkfest, lap it up!

As the world of entertainment moves online in a big way, one of the major hurdles is how to protect your content - 4 in 10 Premier League Fans Stream Illegally.

Infographic: 4 in 10 Premier League Fans Stream Illegally | Statista You will find more statistics at Statista

The below graph might be for the US but it is a good reminder of how varying peoples views on politics and policies can be - Most Republicans Say Universities Negatively Impact U.S.

Infographic: Most Republicans Say Universities Negatively Impact U.S.  | Statista You will find more statistics at Statista




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Across Asia stocks are all lower, we should expect the same here today. Tencent is up a smidgen after having touched 300 HK Dollars yesterday, no mean feat! The reaction in the aftermath of the rates decision will no doubt be felt today .....



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Tuesday, 30 May 2017

Dine for the Bottom Line

"The business more importantly over time has taken control over production during the last few years, everything from tomato paste to fries to muffins to cheese. All big inputs where they can control the quality of the products, and more importantly, for the franchise owners not to get worried about the product delivery and stock. "




To market to market to buy a fat pig A ton of major markets were closed yesterday, it was one of those very rare days that all coincided with one-another. The US was closed for Memorial Day, the UK was closed for Spring Bank Holiday, whilst the mainland Chinese markets were closed for the Dragon boat festival. That same holiday rolls over to today, Hong Kong on the other hand is open for business on both days. I recently found out that Japan has a golden week holiday of their own, at the beginning of May.

With little direction from the major financial centres of the world, we were left to our own devices, a weakening local unit as a result of the president surviving another bout of no confidence. Remember the old Black Cat adverts where the kid eats a peanut butter sandwich and then wins the fight? Our number one may have a giant larder stuffed with tubs of Black Cat.

Resources benefitted from a weaker Rand, up seven-tenths of a percent, most of the other major indices were lower and by the end of the session the All Share had given up one-tenth of a percent. Mediclinic taking some heat post their results, the stock was down 2 percent on the day. Remgro, as a large shareholder in Mediclinic, also took a little heat. Hammerson and Anglo American were amongst the winners on the day. Tongaat Hulett, the sugar producer with land for sale in the Durban North area, bounced back after a torrid time of it with the recent drought. That said, the NAV is lower over five years and the share price is flat over that time. Producing a product that may be in demand by emerging markets, there is going to be pushback from the mainstream customers in time, is the best guess.

A couple of years ago the WHO urged all adults and children to reduce their sugar intake - Guideline, saying "A high level of free sugars intake is of concern, because of its association with poor dietary quality, obesity and risk of noncommunicable diseases." Back in 2003 the US Sugar Association wanted Congress to reconsider its funding of the World Health Organization, as a result of recommendations originally made.

I am all for free choices, if people eat vast amounts of anything, there are health consequences (can you eat too much celery?). If the state is funding your healthcare, then the state can decide what you can and cannot eat, as the same report above says: "Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading causes of death and were responsible for 38 million (68%) of the world's 56 million deaths in 2012. More than 40% of those deaths (16 million) were premature (i.e. under the age of 70 years)."

So where does the line get blurry? Is sugar really awful and does it have a massive impact on humanity? More studies will give us more information in time. Most developed nations are the eaters of most sugar, per capita, currently the average US person consumes 126 grams per day, more than ten times the recommended dose. If there is broad societal pushback, the price of sugar could come under pressure. See the nearly 100 year sugar price, courtesy TradingEconomics.



Confectionary companies like Nestle have confirmed that they will use less sugar in their chocolate bar - Less sugar, great taste: A scientific breakthrough from Nestle, that meets the demand of the consumer. As the release says - "Nestle is patenting its findings and will begin to use the faster-dissolving sugar across a range of its confectionery products from 2018 onwards." So there ..... Like any commodity company, they have steady demand from an increasing population that is urbanising at a faster rate than at any point in humanity. The weather, politics and increased regulatory pressures are factors not in their favour. I don't know, what do you think?




Company corner

Famous Brands released their annual results for their financial year to end February 2017. These include Gourmet Burger Kitchen, the UK burger franchise that Famous Brands bought for 1,8 billion Rand during the last financial year. They also bought a potato chip (french fries) plant, Lamberts Bay Foods for 73.5 million Rand. There was also the acquisition of half of Mexican Salsa (nearly 5 million Rand) and half of the Italian restaurant (early stages) Lupa Osteria. Other than Lamberts Bay, I have been to all of these, for some "market research". Of course there was also the purchase of 49.9 percent of "By Word of Mouth", a well known, especially around these parts, catering business.

Equally, inside of this financial year, the French bakery PAUL has been opened. And If I was skilled enough, I could throw a cricket ball there from my seat (I would have to stand up). I also happen to know pretty well the fellow in charge of the single PAUL, they are looking to expand that wonderful (no carb clever there sportslovers, it is a bakery) store. Remember that PAUL is a French bakery chain that is "global", there are bakeries in the Americas, across the Middle East and of course in Europe (115 alone in Paris and the surrounds). South Africans are VERY receptive to international brands, not too dissimilar to most foreign markets liking international brands. Provided that they are of a certain quality, they (the consumer) will come. This creates interesting opportunities for employment and skillsets in these parts that fit international norms.

Herewith a breakdown of revenues and profits from all the separate divisions, as well as reasons that profits were 100 million Rand lower (more or less) than the prior reporting period. We can get into that in a minute.



See that piece I highlighted in blue? There is a breakdown of that a little later, which relates to costs associated with getting the GBK transaction and various other transactions done, 50 million Rand in total! And then losses on the currency hedges of roughly 55 million Rand (at the half year stage it was in their favour). Equally, and not small fry, Famous Brands impaired their Nigerian asset (Mr. Bigg's, the pie company) by another 20 million Rand. It can be fair to say that Nigeria has not performed to any expectations, either for the locals or the businesses that bought into what is a huge consumer base. Two-thirds of Nigeria's 180 odd million people are UNDER the age of 30 years. There must be scope for class migration higher in the coming years.



There you see the big difference. I wonder what the value of their half is in the Mr Bigg's business and whether that will eventually be written down to nothing? Not too worry too much, of the 2782 stores, only 125 are in Nigeria. There are only 97 GBK's at the moment. The restaurants that they are opening the most of are Debonairs, they opened one a week last year. Steers and Mugg & Bean, around once a fortnight. Inside of the emerging brands, Milky Lane is being rolled out aggressively.

The business more importantly over time has taken control over production during the last few years, everything from tomato paste to fries to muffins to cheese. All big inputs where they can control the quality of the products, and more importantly, for the franchise owners not to get worried about the product delivery and stock.

Why own Famous Brands? The business is in the sweet spot of more people eating out, the entertainment choices available to consumers is heading in the direction of "experiences". Meeting your friends and family at wonderful venues, be it value for money, higher up the chain or in the "luxury" segment, i.e. Tasha's and perhaps GBK now. Mythos, Lupa Osteria and even Mexican Salsa. The business has displayed in the past strong cashflows, the suspended dividend (for now) will be reinstated when the company is happier that these debts (only 16 percent gearing) can be paid down. We like the space, we are encouraged by the results and we remain buy rated on the stock.




JNJ is made up of three sectors. Pharmaceutical, Consumer and Medical Devices. Pharmaceutical is the biggest sector, making up 46,41% of first quarter sales in 2017. Medical devices come in at second place with 35,42% of first quarter sales. Consumer goods make up the remaining 18,17% of sales. When comparing the first quarter of 2016 to 2017 all of these sectors have grown in sales. The most sizeable change being in the medical devices sector which grew sales by $184 000 000.

The business is going to keep buying different products and companies that are profitable and can boost the areas in which their footprint is currently small. When you look at Johnson & Johnson's size, they have so much distribution power, they have so many relationships with different providers of medical devices, that they're able to take these smaller companies and leverage them and make them more valuable than they would have been as stand-alone.

Pharmaceutical

JNJ's biggest sector by sales and most profitable by margin, with operating margins of 39%. The pharmaceutical sector doesn't include the OTC (over-the-counter) drugs that they make.

Remicade has the biggest sales, making up 9,41% of first quarter sales of the entire business in 2017. Remicade is used to treat many auto-immune conditions including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis and plaque psoriasis. There are 2,5 million prescribed users worldwide. Sales have fallen between '16 and '17 due to Pfizer releasing a biosimilar. Sales in the next few years depend on how the drug is priced relative to its new competitor.

Stelara is another immunology drug that has sales amounting to $824m (4.6% of sales) in the first quarter. It is an immunosuppressant that reduces the effects of inflammation. It was approved by the FDA for usage on Crohn's disease and sales have increased further.

Xarelto, is a blood thinning drug that is given to patients to prevent or treat blood clots. Since its inception in '11 the drug has gained momentum and sales have grown. It now holds 17.1% of total market share. It continues to take market share away from Walfarin.

Imbruvica, a cancer fighting drug has grown in sales by 56,7% over the last year to $409 million for the 1st quarter. JNJ plans seven new label expansion filings, including four that could add $500 million or more to Imbruvica's annual sales

Darzalex was only launched three months ago, it has already become the most prescribed fourth-line therapy in multiple myeloma, a multibillion-dollar per year indication.

There are many filings in the JNJ pipeline that are expansions on current drugs. What this means is that they are looking to utilise drugs for different uses than they have previously been approved for. Both drugs that treat cancer are in Phase 3. Zygita treats prostate cancer and Yondelis ovarian cancer.

Consumer

This is JNJ's smallest sector and the sector with the lowest margins currently at 20%, which is still an impressive number. It showed valuable sales growth over the last year. The business comprises of a broad range of products used in baby care, oral care, skin care, women's health, wound care and over-the-counter (OTC) medicines. OTC and skin care are the largest sales for the consumer products segment. Some of these products include Tylenol and Neutrogena. JNJ has taken steps to improve the business' profitability over the last couple of years. This includes a new management team, which led it to getting OTC products back on shelves in the United States and implementing new manufacturing quality standards.

Medical Devices

The medical devices sector of JNJ is the 2nd biggest sector but is growing quicker than the bigger Pharma division. In terms of margins it also falls in second place sitting at a juicy 32%. The biomedical realm is a dynamic environment with technology developments taking place all the time. This is a business segment that is very much managed by adding on small acquisitions and getting rid of low performers.

DePuy Synthes, the orthopedic sector of JNJ is the biggest part of their medical-device sales. Hips, knees, spine. There has been some pricing pressure there. It's a highly competitive market.

The other sector that does well is the surgical equipment sector run under the company Ethicon. This is everything from tools to recovery devices.

JNJ Vision has grown significantly in the last year. They bought the medical-optics subsection of Abbott Labs. This rounded out their eye-health offering, particularly within the surgery category of vision care. They are also responsible for the contact lenses brand Acuvue. More people wanting to get laser eye surgery has created good growth for the sector. That vision-care segment was up the most of any medical devices segment, and it now counts for about 13% of medical devices.

The Diabetes care sector had 2,25% of total sales in the first quarter. LifeScan makes blood glucose monitoring systems for home and hospital. This is a sector that is struggling. JNJ is busy looking at options into how they should take this business forward. Some changes might happen in the next year.

Here are some tabled breakdowns for each division:

Pharmaceutical Division Breakdown
Medical Devices Division Breakdown
Consumer Division Breakdown
Company Breakdown





Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks are up a fraction to begin with. Mr Price is up over five percent, the results are less worse than anticipated. Which I guess is good news at some level, hopefully the consumer really is on the move, even if just a bit.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Friday, 21 April 2017

Healthy Numbers


"On Tuesday the company released first quarter numbers for 2017. Sales increased by 1.6% to $18.8bn, $9.4bn of that was in the US, $3.9bn in Europe, $3.1bn in Asia and Africa and $1.4bn in the Western Hemisphere excluding the US. This is a pretty decent sales mix. I always get encouraged when US companies still have big growth opportunities internationally. For a company the size of JNJ and the brand strength that they possess, the world is their oyster."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Our market closed down just a smidgen yesterday, down 0.09%. PSG was up 3.5% after their results yesterday and Naspers was up over 1% thanks to Tencent trading at record highs in Hong Kong. Having a look at the chart for Tencent, the stock is up an impressive 24% year to date and up 44% over the last 12 months! Naspers over the same time periods, is up 23% year to date but only 15% over the last 12 months. Part of this divergence in fortunes comes down to a stronger Rand, which has gained around 8% against the Hong Kong Dollar. Rand strength doesn't explain all the divergence in fortunes though, it seems South Africans are still skeptical on the Tencent story. Chatting to Byron this morning, we were reminded about when people ("investors") took Koos Becker cashing in share options as a sign to exit Naspers. The news emerged in late 2015 when the share price was around the R1600 - R1700 level, meaning if you sold then you would have left around 45% on the table!

Gold had a rough day out, with the index down nearly 4%. Having a look at how these stocks have done year to date, I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are up. Sibanye is up 13% for this year but still down for the last 12 months, almost halving for the period. A strong Rand, weak platinum price and their pending purchase in the US being the culprits.

New York, New York The Nasdaq reached a record high yesterday, closing up 0.92%. The Dow and S&P 500 were up 0.85% and 0.76% respectively. The strength seems to be stemming from new tax cut talks in the US, Steven Mnuchin saying a tax reform plan was coming "very soon". Tesla was down 1% due to them needing to recall 53 000 cars, which is more than half of the cars they will produce this year (Tesla recalls 53,000 of its Model S, Model X cars). The faulty part is a gear in the parking brake, which seems to be an easy fix and doesn't pose any risk to life.

International news that will have an impact on the global markets going forward is the outcome of the french election. Tomorrow is the first round, where if no candidate gets more than 50% of the vote (very likely to happen) the top 2 candidates go into a second round of voting on the 7th May. From a markets point of view, France staying actively involved in the EU is a good thing. The attacks in France last night might sway some votes more to the Nationalists but time will tell. The polls are showing that Le Pen may get to the second voting round but that she won't get further than that, same as the polls said no Brexit and a Hillary win.




Company corner

Johnson and Johnson needs no introduction. From commercialising first aid kits in 1888 to the $320bn market cap business it is today, the story is extraordinary. Now compromising three core divisions, consumer, medical devices and pharma, the business had annual sales of $72bn last year.

On Tuesday the company released first quarter numbers for 2017. Sales increased by 1.6% to $18.8bn, $9.4bn of that was in the US, $3.9bn in Europe, $3.1bn in Asia and Africa and $1.4bn in the Western Hemisphere excluding the US. This is a pretty decent sales mix. I always get encouraged when US companies still have big growth opportunities internationally. For a company the size of JNJ and the brand strength that they possess, the world is their oyster.

Adjusted earnings per share were up 5.8% to $1.83. Expectations from the company are for $7.00-$7.15 for the full year. Trading at $121 a share, the company trades on 17 times forward earnings which is pretty much in line with market. There is no doubt this is a quality company and quality attracts a premium.

To get a better understanding of their sales mix, take a look at the below image from the results presentation.



Pharma is still the crowned jewel but medical devices had a really good quarter.The medical devices sector is full of innovation and JNJ have the war chest to handpick great bolt on acquisitions. Speaking of which the $30bn Actelion deal has reached agreement and the impact on earnings has already been included. Remember they went after this Swiss business for its leading, differentiated in-market medicines for pulmonary arterial hypertension which already has 65000 patients on board.

The sector certainly comes with regulatory risks. But I think that justifies an investment in JNJ. The business is so big and so well diversified you are protected from certain products facing regulatory scrutiny. The more I follow the healthcare sector the more I realise that although it is a sector you have to be invested in, it is better to go with big conservative businesses. JNJ is the biggest and the most diversified.

Johnson & Johnson remains a core holding in the Vestact portfolio and we are still very happy to be adding at these levels. Scope for global growth is huge and they certainly have the resources to do so successfully.




Linkfest, lap it up

The success of Netflix is shacking up the entertainment industry. The big question that still needs answering is how does sport fit into the future of product offerings? - A potential fight is brewing in TV land over an under-20-dollar TV bundle without sports.

Talking of Netflix, their moat protecting their value lies in their line up of Netflix produced shows - Why the Best Is Yet to Come for Netflix, Inc.. Compared to a few years ago when Netflix produced shows were more miss than hit, their current line up of Netflix originals are world class.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. The All Share opened higher this morning, with the Rand hovering around the same levels as yesterday. Visa had numbers out last night after the market close which were a beat, the stock is set to open 2% higher when US markets open at 15:30 our time. We will give you a better run down of those numbers next week.



Sent to you by Sasha, Michael and Byron on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Monday, 30 January 2017

JNJ Handling the Pressure

"JNJ suggests that this will add 35 to 40 cents EPS immediately. And it will "use" a lot of external US cash, this company is in Switzerland. The expectations are for growth rates to be 1.5 to 2 percent above the long term consensus. I think that this is good for JNJ, which is the only reason we really "care" to pay attention here, even though they paid a lot."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks locally were sold off as a Bloomberg story permeated through the market, a cabinet reshuffle was on the cards again. Although little evidence, other than a strained relationship between the head of state (and cabinet) and some ministers who have not backed the head of the land, the market liked this news like a hole in the head. Sell it was the answer, and by it I mean mostly financials. The top five down in the ALSI 40 were Barclays Africa, FirstRand, RMI Holdings, RMB and Capitec. So what to do in times of uncertainty? The same thing as always I guess, nothing. We always tell you that you cannot change politics, the level of the exchange rate and nor can you change the central banks processes. So worry about the one thing that you can change, what you own and for how long. I plan to own stocks long after multiple dispensations have come and gone and have put their political stamp on matters.

At the bell, the all share index had fallen by four-fifths of a percent, resources were up nearly half a percent, benefitting from a weaker currency, as a result of the political rumour mill turning. Banks as a collective lost over three percent on the day. Liberty Holdings. Ooofff. That was a pretty bad trading update, and unfortunately the advantage of shareholders knowing would have been a better outcome. We were actually having a look at the shareholder base of Liberty Holdings, and around 90 percent is owned by institutions, the anchor shareholder of over 50 percent is Standard Bank of course. Individuals own a mere 2 percent according to my reading of it.

The stock closed the day down nearly 11 percent, and based on the big hit to earnings, looks marginally expensive at these levels. The market as ever is trying to factor in future earnings after this cupboard sweep and may well be thinking that at this time next year (with an improving outlook), that "things" may be on a more steady keel. That light looks a little dimmer. See the BusinessDay take - Liberty update leaves sector reeling.




Over the hills and across the giant seas, stocks were mixed again, the nerds of NASDAQ marginally higher by one-tenth of a percent, with the other two majors, the broader market S&P 500 and the Dow Jones marginally lower. Energy stocks took some heat, I noticed that the weekly rig count saw accelerated additions, meaning that more of the frackers are really comfortable at these price levels. Government pieced together organisations (you know what I am talking about) have very little sway over private institutions.

Starbucks took some heat after their guidance disappointed, the stock was around 4 percent lower on the session. Alphabet (the holding company for Google) lost over a percent on the dat, at the opposite end of the spectrum JNJ and Microsoft enjoyed a day of gains. Amgen also had a good day, their numbers are expected a little later this week, on the second of February. Of course there is the small matter of Apple's numbers after market tomorrow, those are always highly anticipated. Expectations are for around 76 million units (iPhones) to be sold in the last quarter. Jeepers, that is roughly 826 thousand units a day, or 34.4 thousand phones an hour. Wow.




Company Corner

JNJ shelled out a sizeable amount of money last week to acquire a business called Actelion, the presentation casts it as a Unique & Compelling Value Proposition. In short, JNJ are buying the Actelion business for 30 billion Dollars, to "Expands and complement (the) Janssen portfolio with leading, differentiated in-market medicines for pulmonary arterial hypertension."

PAH (pulmonary arterial hypertension) should be read simply as a type of high blood pressure that occurs on the right side of the heart. In the arteries that supply blood to your lungs. As my readings reveal, this is very different from having "normal" high blood pressure. To read more about it, check the piece: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

As the presentation puts forward, 65 thousand patients are currently being treated with these Actelion therapies, and those generated 2 billion Dollars of annual sales in 2015. Quite quickly you can see at 15 times annual revenues that this isn't a cheap acquisition, and in fact, since the news of the potential acquisition broke (last year October), the stock has been lit. Actelion is up (in Switzerland) 103 percent over the last 12 months. And the founder of the business (Jean-Paul Clozel), has hit serious money, 1.5 billion Dollars to be exact.

Even 6th grade math will tell you that he owned 5 percent of the business. Wait, there is more, however. Clozel is going to run an R&D business that will be spun out from the acquisition, a business that could be worth 1 to 2 billion Dollars. That business, call it "Actelion risky" will hold all the experimental treatments (not yet approved) of the existing business. That business, the riskier one will have an initial 16 percent shareholder ship by JNJ, with an option to acquire another 16 percent (to lift it to 32) through a convertible note. i.e. they are going to fund the business in different manners. The former Actelion shareholders will hold 84 percent of the R&D business, which is why it is compelling for them. I have seen others suggest that the pipeline of the R&D business is pretty pedestrian at best, which is why it was good not to tag that whole lot along. Everyone gets want they want?

JNJ suggests that this will add 35 to 40 cents EPS immediately. And it will "use" a lot of external US cash, this company is in Switzerland. The expectations are for growth rates to be 1.5 to 2 percent above the long term consensus. I think that this is good for JNJ, which is the only reason we really "care" to pay attention here, even though they paid a lot. Expectations are for this year that earnings are likely to be 7 Dollars a share, at 16x forward earnings, the stock is well priced and we continue to accumulate on weakness.




Linkfest, lap it up

As the spectre of a trade war looms due to countries becoming more nationalistic and pushing back against globalisation, Josh puts certain job losses into perspective - The truth about trade. As Sasha points out, putting up a wall and charging Mexico 20% import tax isn't charging Mexico for the wall, it is charging the US consumer for the wall. i.e. The consumer will pay the elevated costs as we do for instance with the motor vehicle industry here (and chicken). Clothes and shoes too.

When Gates and Buffett talk it is normally worth listening to. They are some of the smartest people around, so if you have an hour to spare here they are on the stage together talking about the future - Bill Gates and Warren Buffet at Columbia University.

Would you eat a plastic bag? Of course not you say. Wait, there has been a breakthrough, so much so that you can "drink" the plastic bag after having dissolved it in water - Finally! A Plastic Bag That's Safe to Eat.

This is quite "enlightening". The chap in the picture is Art Cashin wearing the Dow 20000 cap. The story points to what we often say, the S&P 500 is the "most important" of all the indices, the Dow has had 133 constituents in 120 years, and is "slow to change" with the times. Nonetheless, it is important - Wow 20,000?




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Happy new year of the Chinese kind, the year of the monkey is now a thing of history. Being the year of the monkey explains a lot. We are now into the year of the rooster, in fact it is the fire rooster.




Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Thursday, 26 January 2017

20 000!

"You can check out another *nice* milestones piece, from the first time the Dow crossed 1000 points in 1972 to present day. 1000 point milestones of The Dow, and then a table for ease of use The Dow's milestones. Just inside of 15 years to double from 1000 to 2000 points. From 2000 to 4000 took less than 8 years. From 4000 to 8000 took only two and a half years, those were the go-go days my friends. From 8000 to 16000 took over 16 years."




To market to market to buy a fat pig It is YUGE, it is amazing, everyone is amazed. I have a lot .... a lot of friends who think this is the biggest, the best and the greatest milestone of equity markets. This is tremendous, I have seen thousands (of points) of milestones, this is unbelievable. We are not weak, stupid or losers, nor are we morons, we are smart, very, very smart. Amazing, huge, tremendous. 20 thousand finally arrived for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the index of 30 of the chosen stocks has more than tripled from the dark days of March the 6th 2009. That is right, tripled from then. To double from when the index first crossed the 10 thousand mark, on the 29th of March 1999 took 6513 days (including the starting and ending day). That is not tremendous.



Who else other than the people who are responsible for the data to celebrate and give you a whole lot of facts - The Dow and the world around it, then and now. Cher was a believer, Justin loved himself, like Cher. What a coincidence! The best fact of all is that Bill gates was the richest on the Fortune 400 back in 1999, he still is. What is hardly believable is that he is worth less on paper today than he was back then, in part as he has given some of that wealth away. To needy causes.

You can check out another *nice* milestones piece, from the first time the Dow crossed 1000 points in 1972 to present day. 1000 point milestones of The Dow, and then a table for ease of use The Dow's milestones. Just inside of 15 years to double from 1000 to 2000 points. From 2000 to 4000 took less than 8 years. From 4000 to 8000 took only two and a half years, those were the go-go days my friends. From 8000 to 16000 took over 16 years.

See how the components have changed over time - Ins & Outs. The last shuffle was done March the 19th 2015. What I find most incredible however is that there was a single fellow, by the name of Arthur "Pop" Harris, who spent 40 years on the job as an employee of the Dow Jones News Service, calculating the level of the index, on the hour every hour. From this section on the special of Dow 20 thousand - How the Dow Works:



Whilst GE has been in the Dow most of the time since 1896, Pop Harris was more synonymous with the Dow for four decades. We all learnt something new today, at least I did. Lastly, scroll through the Sizzlers and Fizzlers. If you have been invested for a decade or more, scroll through the Top Daily % Losses and also Gains, see if you recognise those 5 moments, out of 40 in total. 12.5 percent of all the top highs and lows happened in that post Lehman period, another reminder that those were dark (very) days. 2008 was also the third worst year, percentage wise, on record. That bleak year saw the Dow sink 33.84 percent. The S&P 500 had a shocker that year too, down 38 and a half percent. 2008 was bad, very bad.

OK, history lesson over. Dow 20K has been reached, breached and is now a new level. 20068.51 was the closing level last evening, the intraday all time high is 20082. 2 minutes into trade was when the milestone was reached. As some dumb graph pointed out, each 1000 points added from here will reflect a smaller percentage gain. Last question, is it cheap or expensive? It does not matter what the level is, what are the valuations? Well, luckily there are resources for that - P/Es & Yields on Major Indexes.



The "other" indices also hit all time highs. True story. The nerds of NASDAQ closed up nearly a percent to 5656, the broader market S&P 500 added four-fifths of a percent to 2298, which is two points away from the Goldman Sachs 2017 target. Which means very little to me, market strategists. Eish, one shouldn't be like that.




Company Corner

JnJ reported their full year and 4Q numbers on Tuesday before the US market opened. Off the bat the market wasn't impressed with the forecasted numbers for the coming year, with the stock dropping 2%. The drop highlights how stock prices are current expectations of future profits.

Onto the numbers, sales grew by 2.6% to $71.9 billion for the FY, most of the growth came from the US where sales grew by 6%. On the international side, sales dropped by 0.9% mostly due to a stronger dollar. Earnings grew 7.6% to $18.8 billion for the FY. Thanks to less shares in issue EPS was up 8.5%. So not a small company by any measure. The reason for small top line growth but stronger bottom line growth is due to cost cutting on the "selling, marketing and administrative costs" segment.

The main thing that I think is attractive about the company is that it is 3 businesses in one company. Their main business is their Pharma division which had sales of $33.5 billion, growth of 7.4% and profits of $13.1 billion. Next in line is their Medical Devices business which had sales of 25.1 billion, small growth of 0.9% and $8.1 billion in profits. Then lastly is their consumer division which had sales of $13.3 billion, growth of 1.5% and profits of $2.6 billion. The strongest growing segment of the consumer division was Beauty which grew at 9.4%.

JnJ is one of those companies that ticks all the boxes. It covers healthcare, it covers new technology, it covers consumer products and it is an international player. Given its huge size the growth rates are never going to be eye watering but its size brings diversity and stability. Courtesy of the company here is how shareholders have done over the years. Still a buy in our books.






There was an industry insider who answered our message two days ago - Expect Analysts to Expect

    "The reason for the beat/miss part that makes all the big headlines is that as you know valuation is ultimately driven by expectations of future cash flows, of which future earnings estimates is a driver (well at least a proxy). The "market's expectations" of earnings estimates will hence drive the share price. The market's expectations are a function of analysis, discussion with management and debate within the industry (for example between the sell side and the buy side) hence while far from perfect, are as close as the collective can get to future expectations based on "reasonable" assumptions.

    I think the point is that the market is pricing in the average of expectations, whether the company likes it or not and whether they are right or not and therein lies the relevance of actual vs expected. Therefore I think it's fair to define the actual result as a beat or a miss because that's what it is, relative to expectations (because expectations, like it or not, are effectively "in the price").

    I think where I agree with you strongly is on a lot of market commentators relying just on whether it's a beat or a miss and not looking at the underlying reason which is obviously way more important. If Apple miss earnings because a one off drought in China that hurt disposable income in a big region or something i.e. a one-time impact this would be irrelevant (despite the big headline MISS) vs. if volumes are in what looks like a structural decline clearly the tone of the story/headline should be different.

    As a disclaimer I am in the industry hence do the excel earnings rodeo. And I'll be the first to admit getting it 100% right is a rare experience!


To which I replied:

    1) Your profession is one that requires exceptional insight, you cannot be in your position without being at the top of your game. Your skills in actually picking the stocks is underutilized in the investment game, more research analysts should be portfolio managers is what I am trying to say.
    2) I know that ultimately it depends on what the market is willing to pay today, based on the news we have, and the ability to predict (as much as three years forward) what sales, margins and earnings are likely to be, that is how the price is set.
    3) Some stock prices are perpetually cheap or expensive, and applying one earnings litmus metric across the board is wrong. Luckily in recent years I have seen a change away from this practice. This then makes it harder to predict which stock in which industry is relatively cheaper or more expensive.

    You are amongst the smartest people in the industry and are forced to stick your proverbial member on the block, and all the industry cares about is what price you set. I would prefer a third party independent view of what they think the company is likely to do over a longer period of time, thus setting yourself up for fewer potentially embarrassing moments, that need not arise.

    Some stocks that the industry gets wrong almost all of the time include (by no means comprehensive), Amazon, Facebook, Capitec, Tesla ... there are many. Anglo recently? Naspers? The market gets it right and wrong almost all of the time. Setting yourself a target price over 12 months seems more like a lottery to me. Smart people forced to conform to a norm, with a multitude of unknown factors.


Enjoy, these too and fro emails are always useful to the general public! He replied, I shall leave it there:

    "Agreed re:12 month targets and I think most of our clients largely look past these anyway and are generally more interested in long term thematic views. In fact the feedback we're getting as an industry is that we shouldn't even bother with results notes but focus on long term thought pieces, which makes more sense to me as well. The 12 month target obviously does try and capture the long term themes as most of us use a DCF for valuation (well we do certainly) rather than multiples but clearly trying to pinpoint an exact price on an exact date is going to be more than a little tricky. I think it's more the media that likes the beat/miss story which I guess is what a lot of Vestact's client base see (and panic over I'm sure!) hence all the more reason for your explanation in today's newsletter I suppose."





Linkfest, lap it up

Tired of traffic? If you are Elon Musk, commuting sucks so much that you plan to build a tunnel - Elon Musk says he's going to tunnel under his SpaceX factory soon. Does this fellow ever stop? Does he have large adrenal glands? One thing is for sure, he plans to continue to mix it up.

We have talked often about lower paying, labour intensive jobs under pressure from technology, this is another example - Is This Sewing Robot The Future Of Fashion? Fanuc are reportedly the largest seller of industrial robots, a Japanese listed business with a market cap of 4.6 trillion Yen, 39 billion Dollars nearly. Interesting, yes or no?

Do you use Facebook Messenger a lot? If so, expect ads like Instagram coming to your phone soon - Facebook begins showing sponsored posts in Messenger with small test in Australia and Thailand. We like Facebook a lot and continue to believe that they will monetise all of their platforms.

This happened so quickly, it almost takes your breath away. What are malls likely to look like in developed countries over the coming decades? Mall Owners Rush to Get Out of the Mall Business. We typically avoid these businesses for our clients.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. All we need now is a Roger vs. Rafa final (Venus and Serena are head to head Saturday)! T20, don't want to talk about that.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063