Showing posts with label Pensions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pensions. Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 September 2015

Pensions for the young



"Now if life expectancy is 78 for a woman in Brazil (according to the World Health Organisation), she could potentially be on the government payroll for 32 years, longer than she worked in the first place. For men in Brazil, life expectancy is 71 years, that means that if they also started working at 16, and were eligible for their ending salary (plus inflation increases) when they were 51, the government would have to oblige for 20 years."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. A rally for stocks across the globe ahead of the Fed. The other Fed still licks his wounds from Sunday evening, I suppose a 1.6 million Dollar paycheque for two weeks of work is not all bad, it is not as good Novak Djokovic's 3.3 million Dollars. What you do need to know about this rivalry and what makes it so great is that each has beaten the other in all four majors. And currently it stands at 21 all in 42 matches. Good work you two, keep it up! Keeping up the good work, stocks locally in Jozi, Jozi rallied as a result of US markets, at the end of our trading day, closing around one quarter of a percent higher. Over the last 12 months, stocks as a collective in Rand terms are flat here in Jozi, down 3.3 percent actually. The going has been more than a little tough, this happens from time to time however, stay the course.

Part of the reason is that emerging markets have seen outflows as their prospects have dimmed relative to developed markets, who have undergone their fair share of change and hardships over the last half a decade. Brazil unveiled massive austerity measures to plug all sorts of holes, as far as I could tell, it resulted in a positive impact for all emerging market currencies. Freezing the salaries of civil servants, some job letting (not much, some), spending cuts and tax increases, this does not bode well for their economy. The expectations are that the Brazilian economy is set to endure economic contraction until the end of 2016. The government has shed a whole lot of departments too, which begs the question, were they necessary in the first place?

Also, as a WSJ article points out: Brazil Unveils Nearly $17 Billion in Austerity Measures, the constitution says that women and men can retire after 30 and 35 years of work respectively, with some public servants getting 100 percent of their last salary, adjusted for inflation for the rest of their lives. So, if (as the article points out), a woman begins working at the age of 16, by the time she is 46, she can retire. The constitution says so.

Now if life expectancy is 78 for a woman in Brazil (according to the World Health Organisation), she could potentially be on the government payroll for 32 years, longer than she worked in the first place. For men in Brazil, life expectancy is 71 years, that means that if they also started working at 16, and were eligible for their ending salary (plus inflation increases) when they were 51, the government would have to oblige for 20 years. Equally a big number. For labour this is a major hurdle, they are strong in Brazil, after all the workers party is in charge. Raising retirement age is a no brainer, 60 at least (Australia is busy increasing their retirement age to 67). That would enable greater contributions to public pension systems, enabling the state to afford such generous payouts.

I suppose that the problems of Brazil and Greece are not that dissimilar. Too many worker rights (I'm going to get into trouble), not enough contributions over time and definitely not enough money to meet these ever increasing obligations. I did a similar search for the word retirement in our constitution, it is not bound there to any age. According to the Government Employees Pension Fund, retirement age is 60 years old. And these are based on your contributions over time, not on your last salary. You can say many things about South Africa, we are prudent for the time being, I am guessing that crunch time itself will come and our own austerity will have to be implemented.

Over the seas and far away in New York, New York, stocks rallied hard ahead of the two day Federal Open Market Committee meeting (that takes place today and tomorrow). The Dow Jones added 1.4 percent, the broader market S&P 500 was up just over one a quarter percent, the nerds of NASDAQ were the worst of the lot, still, they gained 1.14 percent in the session. Microsoft saw a bump in their share price, the payout ratio (profits percentage paid to shareholders by way of dividends) has now risen above fifty percent. If Apple did that, their yield would be close to four percent. Microsoft is twice as expensive as Apple (and some more).

Talking Microsoft and Bill Gates, we were looking at Berkshire Hathaway's board (Bill Gates sits on their board) and at the age of 60, Gates was a spring chicken compared to some of the others. Buffett's own son, Howard, who is also a board member, is also 60 years old. Warren Buffett is 84, Charlie Munger is 90, Ronald Olson is 74, some of the non execs like Thomas Murphy and David Gottesman are both 89, Walter Scott is 83. Susan Decker is the youngest board member at the age of 52, the average age of the board (12 of them) is 70 and a half. Leading one to think about that retirement age thing and whether or not age is just a number. I think in the modern world that is the case, thanks to improved nutrition and healthcare improving at a rapid rate each and every year.




Company corner

Hey, this caught my eye yesterday, an announcement by Visa -> Visa Introduces EMV Chip-based Biometrics. Visa is teaming up with ABSA here in Mzansi (why not, for sho!) with biometric cardholder verification. That is fancy for fingerprint technology. So as far as I understand it from the release, you will stick your card into the ATM and instead of being asked for a pin, you will place your fingerprint there and hey presto, the cash will come out of the machine. It will verify that you indeed are the person who owns the bank account and the funds are yours. No more hands covering the pin pad, nobody can steal your fingerprints. Hopefully very soon the card itself will be nowhere, Apple Pay and Android Pay (its newer, check it out: Android Pay) can solve the physical card issue.

The release fleshes it out more and explains why this is important in emerging markets: "Absa Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Barclays Africa Group, will be the first to use Visa's specification to develop a proof of concept trial beginning this fall. Cardholders will use fingerprint readers at select Absa-owned ATMs in lieu of a PIN to complete transactions. In order to prevent potential fraud as well as encourage easier access to banking, there is strong interest in biometric solutions in South Africa and other developing countries where banking and electronic payments may still be nascent."

I am sure the people understand their fingerprints better than a pin number, or not, have I got that wrong? Either way, payment technology is moving fast, full steam ahead. I still think that the entrenched networks and methodologies will evolve to adapt and meet market demand. Whilst at the fringes other technologies will evolve, like Bitcoin etc. those are priced in Dollars last I checked, not so?




Richemont have released a five month trading update this morning. Whilst the currency swings were negative on the way down (for the Euro), they have been equally positive on the way up. At real exchange rates sales only increased 4 percent, in reported currency (Euros) sales increased 16 percent. Europe itself has made a massive comeback, confirming once again that the European recovery has been in full swing here.

Plus, as the release points out, sales were further helped thanks to good tourist numbers (the weaker Euro made it more attractive) in Europe. Equally Japan had a big contribution, that was however as a result of once off factors last year where the sales tax made people buy loads of luxury goods in the first half of the year. The huge blot and confirmation of a slowdown in China is an 18 percent slump in Asia Pacific Sales (minus two percent in Euros). Here goes the table:



If you need to know the contribution from each segment, look no further than the last annual report.



And then of course, sales by region for the full year, as per the annual report:



So what is telling here is two things, one their watch sales is their second biggest division and sales were flat in constant currencies, whilst people went gaga for jewellery (their biggest division) and their "other" segment. Peter Millar, Lancel, (perhaps even Purdey), Shanghai Tang, Chloe, Alfred Dunhill, Alaia and Mont Blanc. Clothing, bags, accessories and even shotguns? Fragrances, wallets, purses, the lot. The other notable thing is that whilst Asia Pacific got spanked, it was Macau and Hong Kong, regions of opulence in China. The release says: "Mainland China resumed growth with retail sales growing at a strong double-digit rate, overcoming lower wholesale demand". As one of our readers pointed out with tongue in cheek,"Must be because China is going backwards???". Well said, on the ground companies are still reporting strong numbers out of China.

So China is regional if you needed reminding, and the story is intact for mainland China to continue to be a bigger contributor in time. We need to wait until the 6th of November to see the first half of what has been a wild currency ride and concerns about China. Although that seems to be confined to the areas of opulence (they be having it as per the DirectTV adverts), which is important. I am not too sure what markets are going to think of these numbers, their costs in Swiss Francs may have risen with the Euro depeg, so their profits might not reflect that really good sales number, albeit in Euros. Still, pleasing to see a major comeback from their second biggest market in Europe.




Linkfest, lap it up

In USD terms, every asset class that you could invest in is down for the year - Nowhere to Hide. . . . Roche says that if you were in cash you would not have gone backwards but he is forgetting about inflation (It is basically nothing but is still there nonetheless), so even cash went backwards.

This technology is still probably about a decade away but it may allow wireless networks to be 100 times faster than they are today - Researchers develop key component for terahertz wireless

As the world moves online, I expect to see more court cases like this. Officials are going to fight hard for taxes on revenues generated by people in their borders, being online makes it hard to determine who the taxes belong to - Netflix and Amazon users sue to stop Chicago's 9% streaming tax

A bit of fun for the mid-week slump, where do you get the most bang for your buck on a per gram basis or on a per calorie basis - How to Eat at McDonald's When You're Monumentally Broke. Having a look at the menu there are very few items that I recognise, a "Southern Style Chicken Biscuit" sounds good.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks across Asia are higher in response to a good session on Wall Street. European futures are all pointing higher, US futures are a little lower, just a smidgen. From the recent highs, just a reminder, the S&P 500 is off 7 percent. The local market has fared far worse, having both a strong commodities focus and of course we are an emerging market. We are down less than one percent year to date. Yes, when the going gets tough, the tough get going. Or so said Billy Ocean.




Sent to you by Sasha and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Monday, 29 June 2015

Greecey Referendum



"On Saturday morning Tsipras announced that on the 5th of July a referendum will be held and the Greek people will decide on what to do. The result is mass confusion as to what the future looks like. The first problem is that the referendum may end up voting on proposals that are no longer valid as the deadline to reach a deal is tomorrow."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. The big news over the weekend is still the developments in Greece. On Saturday morning Tsipras announced that on the 5th of July a referendum will be held and the Greek people will decide on what to do. The result is mass confusion as to what the future looks like. The first problem is that the referendum may end up voting on proposals that are no longer valid as the deadline to reach a deal is tomorrow. The second problem is that a referendum may not even take place as some policy makers are saying that it may not be legal. The third problem relates to what the referendum will state, there are many moving parts to a potential deal, where some people may be happy with a certain level of compromise but not another level of compromise. Or will the result be to stay in the EU at any cost? Tsipras is in between a rock and a hard place. He was elected on the promise of lowering the debt burden but at the same time you do not want to be the Prime Minister who was responsible for your country leaving the EU. A referendum will allow him and his party to put any fallout blame on the Greek people themselves, where you can say the Greek people spoke and we implemented what they wanted.

Uncertainty has lead to people taking money off the table so to speak. Asian markets were deep in the red, the Hang Seng is currently down 3%, the FTSE is down over 2% and our market is down almost 2%. In Greece the banks and the stock market are closed today and there is a limit on ATM withdrawals of 60 Euros. The banks will remain closed until at least next week, after the proposed referendum. The bank closures are needed because a healthy bank can very quickly go bust if people believe that it is no longer healthy or in this case when people think the country that the bank operates in, is no longer healthy. Until there is certainty of where Greece is heading, there is going to be pressure on the banking system; the situation does not need to be made worse by the collapse of banks.

I don't think anyone wants to leave the EU but at the same time, having to cut back on government payouts will not be pleasant for the man on the street. Remember that one of the cut backs that will need to be put through is cut backs to pensions, the older you are the harder it is to still be working and it means you are essentially out of time to get a private pension going on the side. Here are some graphs showing how expensive it is for a state to fund a state pension.


Numbers from OECD report on pensions

A number of figures stick out for me, the first is how much more than average Greece pays in pensions as a percentage of GDP (13% v 7.7%). The other is relative pension that is paid out by the state in replacement of salaries (over 90% v 50%), which is again high. It is now clear why pension cutbacks need to take place for the government to get its spending in a place to pay back debt. The other stats to point out though is the Average Workers Earnings, which is around half that of the OECD average (explains why pensions are so high relative to average salaries). The next stat is the the percentage of the working population over 65, which sits at 30%; higher than the OECD average. There is a higher pension burden on the taxes of those people under 65.




The big news out of the US on Friday was the announcement from the US Supreme court that same sex marriages were legalised in all states. Regardless of your views on same sex marriages, there are definitly better things to be spending resources on than fighting it. The interesting thing to note though is how quickly public opinion has shifted in favour of it. I have seen a couple articles talk about how social media has made it more of a central topic and probably had an impact on the shift in public opinion.




Moving to the East, things are very volatile in the Chinese stock markets. Over the weekend China cut their interest rates by another 25 basis points to 4.85% which coupled with the Greece developments resulted in a very volatile market. There was an intra-day swing of more than 10%, the market bounced between being positive 2.5% and negative 7.6%, finally closing down 3.3%. Volatility like this is definitely a symptom of leverage where people start selling because they have to and not necessarily because they think they should. The problem with buying stocks with borrowed money is that when markets go down you can loose most or all of your initial investment which means you need to sell to keep the shirt on your back. One persons selling pushes prices down further which means the next person needs to sell their shares to not 'blow up' and so the cycle continues.




Company Corner

Last week Nike released solid fourth quarter and full year earnings which comfortably beat estimates, pushing the stock up 5% on Friday. Fiscal year revenues were up 10% to $30.6bn, this was up 14% if you exclude currency movements. Diluted earnings were up 25% to $3.70 per share for the year thanks to improving margins, share buy backs and of course solid sales growth.

The table below breaks down their sales by region, and then between Footwear, Apparel and Equipment.



For the full year footwear represented 58% of sales and grew by 17%, Apparel represented 29% of sales and grew by 10% while equipment contributed 5.7% of sales and was up 1%.

The stock price certainly reflects the growth and growth expected. Trading at $109.70 it affords a forward multiple of 26 times next years earnings. But with earnings growth of 25% the PE ratio to growth is close to 1.

Now we need to ask the question, will Nike maintain this incredible sales growth and what will be the drivers behind it?

First and foremost, brand strength is incredible. They are the Apple of apparel and footwear. They have just won sponsorship of the NBA and already dominate the NFL. They sponsor most of the major sports teams and personalities around the world. Here at Vestact we believe that not only will the adoption of sports and active lifestyles go from strength to strength but also the viewerships and following of professional sports. It targets our inner instincts for competition, rivalry and pride for club or country. In female sports this is also growing fast. The ladies Football World Cup is currently underway and receives huge media attention. There are huge global sporting events all the time and they are receiving more and more attention, especially amongst social media.

Participation rates are also growing fast. In the US there were 25000 marathon runners in 1976. In 2013 there were 541000. In 1976 10% were women, today 46% of the runners were female.

Nike have also embraced and to an extent pioneered the shift to athletics wear as a fashion statement, it even has a name, Athleisure. This shift has been huge for their apparel sales and we expect this to carry on growing, especially as it gets embraced in developing markets.

Our Investment philosophy at Vestact is to select stocks which are leaders in sectors which we expect to grow faster than what the market expects. Even though the market has high expectations we still believe it is underestimated amongst apparel and sportswear. We continue to buy Nike shares at these levels.




Linkfest, lap it up

It makes sense that armed forces are some of the biggest employers in the world - These are the 10 biggest employers in the world. I was surprised to see the UK NHS on the list.



An attempt like this pushes man and machine - Swiss Pilot Begins 5-Day Flight Attempt in Solar-Powered Plane. I struggle to be in a plane for longer than 12 hours, I cant imagine doing it for 5 days!




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog.Markets are down around the globe. Greece is being smeared all over our screens. Uncertainty means sell now, ask questions later. We remain calm here.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939