Showing posts with label Nike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nike. Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 November 2017

Superstar vs Cortez


To market to market to buy a fat pig. As part of Trump's drive to remove regulation and government involvement in the private sector, it was announced yesterday that Obama 'net neutrality' laws are on their way out. Net neutrality is where internet service providers are not allowed to favour some web-pages over others. Here is the Wikipedia page on Net neutrality, where they give a more detailed breakdown and examples.

As this article points out, F.C.C. Plans Net Neutrality Repeal in a Victory for Telecoms, removing net neutrality is a win for telecom companies because they can charge more for the infrastructure that they have built. They can go to the consumer and ask them to pay more so that Netflix viewing is smooth. The Telecom companies can then also go to Netflix and ask Netflix to pay up so that their data moves easier over the telecom's network instead of a Netflix competitor like Hulu.

There are good arguments for and against net neutrality, where telecom companies win on the one side, and internet companies win on the other side. Living in South Africa, this is a debate we have never had. It is commonplace when signing up for an internet line, for your option to be 'throttled' and the other more expensive options to run smoothly. That is normal right?

Market Scorecard. It was another great day out for global stock markets. The Dow was up 0.69%, the S&P 500 was up 0.65%, the Nasdaq 1.06% and the All-share was up 1.18%. It is amazing to think that Naspers is up 60% since July; this is not a small cap company that just landed a new contract, this is the biggest stock on our market! Just Wow.




Linkfest, lap it up

One thing, from Paul

I updated the 'About Us' page on the Vestact website yesterday afternoon, which required me to check in on the performance of our model portfolios in both the Johannesburg and the New York markets. We have been managing money locally in Rands for nearly 15 years, and offshore in US Dollars for just under 13 years.

Since 2003, the compound annual return of our model Johannesburg portfolio is 18.8 percent after fees. This is solidly above the return on the JSE Alsi 40 over the same period of 15.3 percent.

The compound annual return of our model New York portfolio since 2006 is 10.4 percent in dollars and after fees. This is well above the return of the S&P 500 over the same period of 6.1 percent.

Read the whole thing here, which also discusses our approach to stock picking and holding through the cycles. There is a nice picture of the team!




Byron's Beats

Nike has lost a fair amount of market share to Adidas over the last 2 years. Most of that has been within the teen age group, ironically with it's old school trends. This Bloomberg article titled How Adidas Beat Nike at the Old School Game explains the various trends of the Adidas Superstar, Adidas Stan Smith and the Nike Cortez.



To put this all into context, when Nike was just getting started in the 60's, Adidas was the market behemoth. However, Nike slowly became a cultural phenomena and overtook their larger rival. Nike is still twice the size of Adidas and comfortably the market leader. This recent trend is actually more Adidas coming off a low base after a torrid period.

As you can see, these trends come and go. The sector is growing and all these businesses will probably do well over the long run. We still feel the Nike brand is superior and will generally dominate the trends more than the rest.




Michael's Musings

Not only does Amazon make it cheaper and easier to shop but they employ an army of people - Amazon holiday hiring is reaching sky-high levels - this year's tally will be about 120,000. What is even more amazing is that between July and September this year, Amazon increased their staff count by 159 500 people; a chunk would have come from Whole Foods.



Not owning a car and not having a human behind the wheel is the future, Uber is making plans to get that future here sooner rather than later - Uber plans to purchase 24,000 self-driving cars from Volvo in a potential multi-billion dollar deal




Bright's Banter

Taylor Swift... a marketing genius or just a really good vocalist? I think both!

To promote her new album "Reputation" she had a one week streaming blackout and the album sold 1.29 million copies becoming an instant bestseller. "Reputation" joins an exclusive group of six albums to hit 1 million sales in a week in this decade. That is mind blowing.

Your boy likes Taylor Swift tunes, so don't be shocked when you hear bangers like "ready for it" and "look what you made me do" when I drive past you in traffic.

Taylor Swift Needed Only One Week And A Streaming Blackout To Make Reputation The Best Selling Album Of The Year




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Later today we will get a CPI read for Mzanzi, where the forecast is for CPI to drop to 4.8% from 5.1%. If inflation comes down I think it is safe to say that the MPC won't increase rates tomorrow. Tomorrow is Thanksgiving in the US, so they are releasing the initial jobless claims today.




Sent to you by Team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Monday, 2 October 2017

Nike Absorbs a Tax Hikey


To market to market to buy a fat pig. Things look messy in Spain at the moment, the Spanish government are saying that no referendum took place and if it did, it was illegal. Senior politicians in Catalonia are saying that the referendum, where 90% voted yes to independence, clearly shows they should be an independent state. Given how difficult it was to go cast your vote, there were a number of injuries, it makes sense that the 'yes' voters persevered and the 'no' voters stayed at home.

As Paul was saying in the office this morning, imagine if the Western Cape decided that they didn't like being coupled with the rest of South Africa and wanted to be independent. Imagine the chaos and division that would ensue. I don't have friends or family living in Spain, I don't even support a Spanish Football team, so I don't have a horse in this race. From an outside perspective, one country is always better than two. There are less regulations, less bureaucracy, less politicians to pay and more movement of resources to where they need to be.

New York, New York. On Friday, there were record highs again for US markets. Here is the scorecard, the Dow was up 0.11%, the S&P 500 was up 0.37%, the Nasdaq was up 0.66% and the All-share was up 1.06% We are still below the 56 000 mark for local markets but with a few good days, we will also be in record high territory.




Company corner

Michael's Musings

Last week we had 1Q numbers from Nike, which missed analyst estimates at the top line but beat on the bottom line. Here is the press release from the company, Nike, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2018 1Q Results . Here are the headline numbers, revenue of $9.07 billion up 0.1% from $9.06 billion and EPS of $0.57 down 22% from 0.73%. A big reason for the drop is due to their effective tax rate going from 2.5% to 11.4%; as you can see much lower than the 35% US tax rate thanks to all the deductions allowed.

As it stands at the moment, the company has two distinct parts to the business. They have their North America (NA) segment which accounts for around 45% of their sales and the 'international' segment which is around 55%. The NA division has been struggling as wholesaler middle men like Foot Locker have been closing stores. There has also been increased competition from the likes of Adidas and Under Armour. Compared to the first quarter of 2016, the NA division saw revenues drop 3% to $3.9 billion. To counter the issues of middle-men distributers, Nike has been going directly to the customer in the form of the Nike stores and through their online retail page. The Nike direct division had sales increase by 11% and the online segment grow sales by 19%.

The bulk of the International division had growth of around 5%, but the region of most excitement for Nike is China. They grew sales by 12% in China, bringing in revenue of $1.1 billion for the quarter. For now all the growth in China is offsetting the shrinkage in NA but once NA stabilises we should see strong top-line growth again.

If the athleisure space was a stagnant market there would be cause for concern due to the resurgence of their competitors. This is a market that is still growing, particularly in emerging markets, there is space for all the competitors. The main reason to own Nike at the moment is due to the huge growth potential coming out of China.




Linkfest, lap it up

One thing, from Paul

This week on Blunders: there could be cash in your cistern, Equifax is a mess, cheating marathoners in Mexico, and Hugh Hefner is dead - Blunders - Episode 74




Byron's Beats

Elon Musk has certainly perfected the ability to wow the world with his announcements. Steve Jobs was brilliant at this but no one else since Steve has been able to capture the world's attention (and imagination) until Musk came along. On Friday Elon introduced some incredible concepts to the world. Mars exploration is still pretty far fetched in my opinion. I am far more interested in making this planet a better place. This YouTube clip titled BFR Earth to Earth shows that you can fly to most places on earth in under 30 minutes. Watch the clip and you will see what he means, it is only 2 minutes long.




Bright's Banter

We have been getting quite a number of questions from our clients who hold Sasol Inzalo shares about what to do next since the scheme has not made them any money. This Biznews podcast with Paul Victor CFO of Sasol, and the Co-CEOs Steve Cornell and baba uBongani Qwababa goes in depth on what went wrong with the previous scheme and what the new Khanyisa Transaction is trying to achieve - Everything You Need To Know About Sasol Inzalo And Sasol Khanyisa Transaction

Further reading on the topic can be found here straight from the company's website.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Asian markets are closed today. Our market is off to a strong start this morning but the Rand is on the back foot due to the Dollar surging.




Sent to you by Team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Friday, 30 June 2017

Nike Spikey Likey

"For the full year the company managed to grow revenues by 6 percent to 34.4 billion Dollars, that is up 8 percent on a currency neutral basis. There are now (as at the year end) 985 Nike stores globally. Some of the iconic ones stand out, in New York and London, the experience is always "good" and the variety and quality is always excellent."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks in New York, New York, were all lower across the board, tech stocks taking a pasting again. It seems like the volatility has certainly opened up, there have been bouts of selling and buying of the NASDAQ, which is all of 3 percent from the all time highs. That hardly sounds like a massive sell off? By the end of the session the Dow Jones had fallen four-fifths of a percent, the broader market S&P a little more than that, whilst the nerds of NASDAQ had sunk nearly a percent and a half by the close.

Alphabet sold off again, down nearly two and a half percent by the close. Apple down a percent and a half, Microsoft down 1.88 percent by the close. Tech stocks selling off on matters such as the inability of the current US administration likely to get through their tax reforms without significant compromise. And of course the travel ban, which may impact on the ability of the technology firms to attract quality employees.




Locally stocks sold off around half a percent as a collective, industrials were down nine-tenths of a percent by the close. At the top of the pops on a sliding US Dollar were the likes of Glencore and Anglo American, as well as BHP Billiton and Capitec. Sasol and Richemont were at the bottom, as well as British American Tobacco. Resources by the close were around three-tenths of a percent better on the day.

More politics is likely to dominate the landscape as the ANC policy conference takes place over the coming days. It is always unfortunate that politics should trump the business of business, most especially when politicians around the world have very little real life business experience. Yet they dictate to the very people who produce the revenues as if everything is "so easy". We are in the interest of talking about businesses that succeed, despite any political meddling. And it is a busy day, herewith some company insights below.




Company corner

We promised another take on the Naspers results from last Friday. This is about the most muted price reaction that I have seen in a while to the Naspers results. First things first, Naspers trades at a significant discount to the value of the stake that they have in Tencent. I can see why in some investors minds, this is more than a little irritating. For starters, as of the close of business in Hong Kong, the price of Tencent was 284 Hong Kong Dollars a share. That puts the market capitalisation at 2.69 trillion Hong Kong Dollars. 33.85 percent of Tencent (what Naspers owns) is 910 billion Hong Kong Dollars. Which equals more or less 1.513 trillion Rand! The Naspers market capitalisation was 1.13 trillion Rand, a gap of almost 400 billion Rand. i.e. minus 400 billion Rand for all the other businesses.

How is that possible? Is it that Tencent holders are valuing the company at too high a multiple and are the local investors being more "realistic"? Even if Naspers were ONLY holding Tencent, applying such a deep discount on a fast growing asset would seem a little bizarre. The fact of the matter is that there are businesses deep in Naspers, not all of which are profitable and some are also legacy businesses. I suspect that a lot of it has to do with the very heavy weighting in the South African index, where foreigners have been net sellers of the stock. Added to that, the local investment community has always thought that the stock is overvalued, so you are stuck with the company trading at this big discount.

Plus of course, there is internal debt that belongs to Naspers itself, not Tencent. As an investment holding company, it is not uncommon to discount share price relative to the NAV. It happens often. Tencent is not cheap, it trades on a historical multiple of 50 odd times, growing earnings in the mid twenties (percentage wise). As such the PEG ratio is still pretty high, the market is expecting BIG things from Tencent and thus far it has delivered.

This is an incredible article from Bloomberg about how they ended up here, and profiles Martin Lau, the Tencent president -> Tencent Dominates in China. Next Challenge Is Rest of the World. Read it, from beginning to end. You will learn many things about the corporate culture at Tencent and how they are far from done, only starting out. Again, it is an entertainment business, widely misunderstood by the investment community. Let us face it, many investment analysts are unlikely to engage in the new game releases on their handsets. The president of Tencent (as per the article) did some deep research into the business they were buying, becoming so good at the game (that they were buying), he clocked a top 100 all time score.

Naspers holds a whole bunch of investments, other than Tencent. Delivery Hero lists today (Delivery Hero Prices $1.1 Billion IPO at Top End of Range) and Naspers owns around ten percent (less post the dilution of the share issuance). It is another reminder of their global investment reach and aggressive nature to stay current.

Unlike the noise making fellows who are looking for quick returns, we remain very patient on the prospects of the company having multiple businesses inside of their stable. Tencent itself continues to evolve, with multiple business avenues. And if you can continue to accumulate the stock at a discount. It is a great opportunity, we continue to recommend this company as a buy.




Nike reported results last evening, they are a little out of sync with the rest of the businesses that we own. These numbers are for their fourth quarter to end 31 May, a strange financial year end in any place. There certainly are no governments that run their fiscal year to end May. It must have been something about starting the financial year at the beginning of the North American summer, when athletes and enthusiasts get back on the road. Perhaps I will email them and ask them why this is the case.

Immediately one is struck with the fact that the direct business (website and own stores) and the international business, as we thought and conveyed, is doing better than the North American business, driving sales at a faster pace than the market anticipated. Revenues for the quarter were up 7 percent on a currency neutral basis (5 percent up in Dollars), the company saw double digit growth in the likes of Western Europe, Mainland China and other emerging markets.

Diluted EPS rose 22 percent over the corresponding quarter, to 60 US cents, for the full year up 16 percent to 2.51 Dollars. Helped by lower tax rates, outside of the US and fewer shares. 3 percent less shares, as a result of course of company buybacks. During this year the company bought back 14.9 million shares for 820 million Dollars, as part of the extended 12 billion Dollar buyback program. That is around 55.03 Dollars a share, which is higher than the closing price last evening, which was 53.17 Dollars. The 52 week trading range has been 49.01 to 60.33 Dollars a share. We will get to the market and the price reaction in a bit.

For the full year the company managed to grow revenues by 6 percent to 34.4 billion Dollars, that is up 8 percent on a currency neutral basis. There are now (as at the year end) 985 Nike stores globally. Some of the iconic ones stand out, in New York and London, the experience is always "good" and the variety and quality is always excellent. This sales matrix below tells you a lot about the business. It is still predominantly a shoes business, with 61 percent of sales coming from footwear (see right at the bottom of the table). It is still predominantly a developed market business, with 60 percent of the sales of shoes and clothing coming from North America and Western Europe.



China, although growing quickly, is only 12 odd percent of the total sales. Ditto emerging markets. These are the fast growing businesses and present big opportunities. In the unofficial transcript, the point is clearly made by Andy Campion (The CFO and executive vice president): "current per capita spend on Nike in those markets is still less than 1/10th of the per capita spend on Nike in more developed markets. Over time, macroeconomic drivers and consumers' expanding passion for sport will create even greater capacity for the Nike Brand to grow in those markets."

The market agrees wholeheartedly that the company is once again poised for growth and is through the worst of the North American "retail malaise". The stock, pre-market, is up 7.81 percent to 57.32 Dollars. I suspect that in the coming days and weeks, the analyst community will now be "excited" about the prospects and I think that they are likely to be upgraded. We continue to accumulate what we think is a positive multi-decade investment theme, thanks to growing health awareness and higher emerging market incomes. Likey, likey, Buy Nike.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks have started better here today. It is a short week in the US next week, a half day Monday and a day off Tuesday (4th of July). The start of summer in the Northern hemisphere, is that still a thing, with regards to the volumes?




Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

Max on innovation

"The company is focusing their efforts to double the speed at which they deliver their products to the consumer on a direct basis (more through the online platforms) and double their innovation patterns. Air Max launches some new models in a few days time (to celebrate 30 years, retro designs) and Air VaporMax is the newer shoe, launched this Saturday."




To market to market to buy a fat pig The truck backed up .... you could hear the beep-beep-beep ringing out. The inevitable headlines came through, Trump reforms may not happen, etc. It was not even a heavy decline, by the smooth sailing market standards, a percent and some more down was the first for US equity markets since October last year. Wow. I guess when your pattern recognition recency bias becomes used to a certain "structure", the inevitable stock market sell off comes as a little shock. Pattern recognition is why people love looking at charts, it helps them either validate a sale or purchase.

There was a little more than that, political again, with the Trump administration unable to take apart "Obamacare", and push forward the republican agenda. Politics impacts on markets. How? Well ..... if the Trump administration does not have the necessary support from the rest of the politicians, that does not exactly bode well for further policy pushes, if you know what I mean. Should it worry you? Nope. Can the market fall further from here? Of course, equities markets can always fall fiercely and at speeds you don't expect, humans and money make a funny concoction. Fear, greed and all the other emotions that go into market.

Session end the Dow jones industrial Average had given up over a percent, down 1.14 percent, the nerds of NASDAQ had been slammed, down 1.83 percent and the broader market S&P 500 had lost around one and one-quarter of a percent. Financials and basic materials had been sold off particularly hard, Alphabet lost over two percent, Wells Fargo and Bank of America lost around three apiece. No ability to push through big plans and implement huge sweeping reforms equals market sell off. If you can imagine that the healthcare reforms (on the reforms from before) would be pushed through with the Republican agenda intact, then you would no doubt see the reverse. Investing based on politics and political agendas is dangerous.




Stocks in Jozi skipped the trading session day yesterday, in celebration/memoriam of an important day in our history, a sad day in which 57 years ago, 69 souls lost their lives at a police station in what is modern Southern Gauteng, right on the border of the Free State. The South African constitution was signed at Sharpeville on the 10th of December 1996 by Nelson Mandela, it is an important place and event in our history, and some would argue that international opposition heightened at this point, ultimately leading to a free and open society for all the people who live in this land. I just wish that these celebrations would fall on Mondays or Fridays.

On Monday stocks enjoyed an up day, nearly four-tenths of a percent to the good. Industrials were the real drivers, Naspers was at the top of the leaderboard, around three and one-third of a percent to the good. Amplats, South32 and Kumba were all at the opposite end, down with sliding commodity prices and a strengthening Rand, not an event that happens too often in conjunction with one another. There were multiple twelve month highs for the likes of Discovery and Capitec, Adcock and Exxaro, as well as Santam and Astral. Chickens, insurance, banking/loans and coal, as well as pills. A lot of those businesses are firmly SA inc. in nature, leading one to believe that the economy may be in better shape, as far as those in the stock market are concerned. i.e. Share prices move ahead of the event, predicting better earnings. Today we may look a little worse for wear, being in catchup mode from the red US market last night.




Company corner

Nike, the footwear and sports apparel company, perhaps the best known of all of them, alongside competitors like Puma, Adidas (experiencing a renaissance) and more recently Under Armour, reported results last evening that beat on the bottom line handsomely. Unfortunately the top line was not within expectations, once again fuelling the naysayers who are predicting a slow down globally in their brand. This investment theme is a firm favourite here at Vestact, the thesis being that more and more people are active and are taking their exercising more seriously. The rise of awareness and linkage of dread diseases to sedentary behaviour has prompted many to take up exercise. i.e. My body is my temple, that whole theme, right!

I recall that when I ran my first major ultra marathon (Two Oceans), over a decade and a half back, there were three odd thousand people at the start line. "Serious athletes". What was more telling however, wasn't the field size of the "major" event, it was that the lesser half marathon started after the ultra. Nowadays, getting entry into the half marathon is not guaranteed, there are arduous processes and lotteries and heartache for those that missed out on an entry. That tells you, that even in South Africa, people want to set goals and compete in higher endurance events. With that, and the theme is a global one, there are a growing number of entries into Iron Man/Woman (and the half), multiple cycle races and the rise of non-traditional sporting codes, anything from dancing to cross training.

All those new participants will need newer and better kit and footwear to keep up to speed with their mates and fellow participants. Wearing athletic gear is no longer something that is reserved for gym time or your running session, it now passes for casual wear. You can wear your favourite football, basketball or gridiron top without being ridiculed by your mates for when you are getting on the team. Or simply, wear what makes you feel comfortable, that is what has happened. When I look back on 1970s footage of athletic wear, I cringe at the "bad" clothes. That has all changed, and continues to rapidly evolve. There, you get why we like the investment theme, there are more participants than at any other time in history, owning and buying what are pretty expensive and evolving technology. Richer populations with more spare time to keep healthy and fit need the best quality.

Nike reported their 2017 third quarter results last evening, after the market close. Revenues grew 7 percent on a currency neutral basis, 5 percent in Dollar terms. 8.4 billion Dollars is the current quarterly run-rate, the group had targeted 50 billion Dollars by 2020 as a target. Diluted earnings grew 24 percent, to 68 cents per share, a lower share count and lower tax rate as some of the factors helping. Gross margins compressed 140 basis points as a result of sales, higher production costs and forex headwinds.

Outside of the US, the company experienced double digit growth across Western Europe excluding currencies, was up 10%; Greater China excluding currencies, up 15 %; most of their emerging markets excluding currencies, up 13 %. North America saw 3 percent growth, both across apparel and footwear. The company has roughly 44.5 percent of sales from North America, with nearly 30 percent of that being shoes alone. 3 out of every 10 Dollars in sales is a pair of sneakers in North America. Chinese sales of footwear is 9.2 percent of toatl group sales and Western Europe footwear sales is 11.8 percent for the total group sales. Roughly, those three territories, China, North America and Western Europe, represent 75 percent of all of their business. Makes you think that there is plenty of scope for them to grow globally.

The company is focusing their efforts to double the speed at which they deliver their products to the consumer on a direct basis (more through the online platforms) and double their innovation patterns. Air Max launches some new models in a few days time (to celebrate 30 years, retro designs) and Air VaporMax is the newer shoe, launched this Saturday. There are also plans afoot (excuse the pun) to cut through the two hour marathon mark with selected athletes wearing a Nike ZoomX midsole. And focus in the right areas. Inside of the unofficial transcript, the President of the Nike brand, Trevor Edwards had this to say:

    Now, in China, the opportunity is massive. Just over the past five years, the number of marathons there has grown 500%, and China's government predicts a sports economy valued at $850 billion by 2025 - by far the world's biggest. Our leading brand position in China gives us confidence we will continue to see real growth from this expanding market.


That is pretty telling. Recent events in China have suggested the company had misleading advertising practices. The state broadcaster alleged that the company didn't have the right sole, as per the advertising. Not good. That said, who to trust in China, a market that is notoriously misleading to many a consumer. What this tells you is that the consumer is definitely becoming more and more aware of their products and have higher expectations. As Nike has a higher selling point, relative to some of their peers, a more affluent and aware consumer is "good news". And a more fit one too.

Whilst the rest are worried about a lack of top line growth, I suspect that we are in a lull. The brand is increasingly up against a resurgent Adidas (I like their CEO, I like their brand) and recently Under Armour (the share price has fallen hard). This is good news for all of these producers, it will force them to all work a lot harder in getting the consumer their optimum product, be it apparel or footwear. The best is yet to come, the company is now trading on the least expensive multiple in half a decade, on a relative basis (to the rest of the market), double that time period. The market has not been receptive to these results, if you are in gathering mode, this is a wonderful opportunity to gather what is a multi decade growth investment theme. We continue to recommend the stock as a buy.




Linkfest, lap it up

I can see this move causing much debate, what is the best way to show a globe on a flat surface? - Boston public schools map switch aims to amend 500 years of distortion



It is amazing what technology allows us to do. I wonder how long the well took to drill and how often they have to stop drilling due to mechanical issues? - Visualising The World's Deepest Oil Well. The infographic hints at the world running out of oil, that is not the case. Over the last decade, proven reserves have been on the up.






Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Catch-up for the local market may well mean we have to sell off to begin with today, that is just the way it goes sports lovers.



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Tuesday, 20 December 2016

Nike swishes back

"Whilst some of the anxieties around losing market share to rivals, like Under Armour and a resurgence of competitor Adidas have been real, I think that they are a little overdone. Nike is still comfortably a solid growth business, having recorded now the 28th straight quarterly increases."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks were up again. You remember the book from your childhood titled "The Little Engine That Could". Various versions are over 100 years old, and involves a much smaller train engine that pulls a long bunch over a steep hill, saying all the way to the top "I-think-I-can, I-think-I-can." Once the little train engine crests the hill and heads down, it says "I thought I could, I thought I could." You know the story as "The Little Engine That Could".

The Big Dow Jones that Could is still in I-Think-I-Can Mode. In other words, not quite there yet. And by there, I mean 20 thousand points. Whilst new levels are fun to reach, breach and stay there and beyond, they are really just a function of long term profits exceeding the past and inflation over time. There is nothing psychological or otherwise about a level. The old index of blue chip industrial stocks that are said to reflect the landscape of industrial American got close, no cigar though - 19,987.63 was the intraday high reached at the get go.

The index fell back a little over the course of the day, ending the session at 19,974, up 0.46 percent on the day. I suspect that all things being equal, and with the decent results overnight from the biggest laggard in the Dow, Nike, that the index may assault that level. What? These are not Normandy landings or any other such event, it is a level people!!! Wiki has a *nice* entry for Closing milestones of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. 1000 was first reached in November 1972, 2000 in January of 1987. 10,000 of course in May of 1999, when everyone was fearless. 15 years to double from 1000 to 2000, more than that (we are nearly there) this time around. From 4000 to 8000 took a mere two and a half years, the roaring 90's.

There is something called the "theoretical" all time high (if you scroll to the end of the article above), in which all the components are measured against their 30 stock component intraday highs. i.e. If Microsoft and Apple, Nike and Caterpillar, Home Depot and Cisco, Coca-Cola and Goldman Sachs were all trading at their day highs (during trade yesterday), the index would actually have breached the mark, and been at 20 thousand and 65 points. Alas, not everything goes up in a straight line together, winners and losers are kept separately on different boards.

CNN Money has a very useful Dow 30 Constituents board. Caterpillar the best this year, Nike the worst this year with Coke the only other noticeable loser. Anything on that list that is under 14.63 percent up for the year is an index underperformed, AMEX, Apple, Boeing, Cisco, Disney, Du Pont, GE, Home Depot, Intel, JNJ, McDonald's, Merck and Microsoft (just), Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Travelers and Visa. All Dow Jones under-performers. More than half of the index prices have underperformed, as the index was led higher through the year by oil stocks and financials (and associated), Caterpillar, Chevron, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and then one outlier, UnitedHealth (diversified healthcare and insurance business), are all above 30 percent up YTD.

So there goes, a summary of what could have been, what has happened and what may be today. As it stands, as I write this, the Dow futures are a fraction higher, we will just have to wait for now. The other indices? Well, they also closed in on record territory (a few points away now), the broader market S&P 500 added just over one-third of a percent to end out the session at 2270 points, the nerds of NASDAQ clocked an intraday all time high, up nearly half a percent to 5483. You see, the numbers are meaningless unless you can associate with them, 20 thousand has a nice ring to it, 5500 less so.




Back where home is, stocks were nowhere near the all time highs, emerging markets have lagged US markets. Rates and growth prospects have seen to that. Stocks did rally nearly a percent as a collective in a broad based rally, only the precious metal stocks lagged, both the gold and platinum mining indices were the noticeable losers on the day. There really was not much corporate news to speak of really, I guess the time of the year has everything to do with it.

Sappi and Aveng reached new 52 week highs, Sibanye was trading at a 52 week low, the stock has more than halved in just over three months, it certainly has been the worst of times for them. Growthpoint, Bidvest and Mediclinic were at the top of the majors pile, all up over 2 percent, whilst there were only a handful of stocks down in the Top40, in any meaningful way, Kumba, South32, Hammerson and Investec down three-quarters of a percent and beyond. For the record, stocks closed at 50,343 points, up 0.93 percent on the day. Our all time highs are from late April 2015, another 9 odd percent to get there I am afraid, and that is in Rand terms.




Company corner

Nike reported numbers last evening, for their second quarter, after the bell had rung for the close. It was a beat by most metrics that matter for folks that look at the headlines. I learned something new (which is always a good thing) yesterday, the chief executive, who is essentially a Nike lifer, Mark Parker was on the design team with Tinker Hatfield. So? Both of them actually were considerably good track athletes at university (college), where Tinker actually held the pole vault record at University of Oregon, where he was coached by Phil Knight's mentor and co-founder of Nike, Bill Bowerman.

Ah-ha. So, there is a theme here, all these fellows were once quality athletes at a regional level. Nike founder Phil Knight himself was coached by Bowerman and boasted a 1 mile best of 4 minutes and 10 second. Put that in your waffle shoe and run it. If Bowerman were still alive, he would be 106 next year, alas his time was up way before the tech bubble burst, he was much older and helped shape the Knights and Parkers, the Hatfields and co., the people that are Nike today.

Back then it was Blue Ribbon Sports (you must read the book Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike), and they sold other shoes, a company that would eventually become Asics. My point is that the company management have all lived as athletes in the business, and have seen it grow sharply over the years to a 30 billion Dollar plus annual revenue company.

Nike has a slightly different cycles to many other businesses, their second quarter ended at the end of November, rewind 6 months and you come up with an April year end. Revenues for the quarter were 8 percent higher to 8.2 billion Dollars, diluted earnings per share rose 11 percent to 50 cents for the quarter. The company was pretty aggressive in their buyback in the quarter, buying 900 million Dollars in stock, as part of the 4 year 12 billion Dollar repurchase program.

So far, the company is at 3.1 billion Dollars, just over one-quarter of the way to the buyback target. For a reference point, at the market close last evening, the market capitalization of the business was 86 billion Dollars. So they are looking to, when the program ends, buy back around 10 percent of the company market cap as it exists now. That is pretty phenomenal, and what it does (provided all the shares are retired) is boost the earnings per share on the ones that remain behind. The same company earnings on fewer shares in issue.

The group does around 27 percent of all their sales in footwear in North America, 15.5 percent in apparel in North America (a little equipment sales) for a grand total of 44.6 percent North America. So, essentially it is easy to see why the analyst community see this as a home base company. Meanwhile (back at the ranch as they said in the old days), total sales in China exceeded 1 billion Dollars in quarterly revenue, up 19 percent on same currency sales across that territory. Western Europe was also strong, reporting same currency sales of 11 percent more than this time last year. Good strong growth in their two next biggest territories, which is encouraging, I am pretty sure that there has to be some currency headwinds at some stage.

From a profits point of view, Europe was hit by currencies, a strong Dollar definitely impacting on group margins too. Currencies are almost impossible to manage, damned if you do, damned if you don't is the sense I get, at least from the viewpoint of the analyst community. Whilst some of the anxieties around losing market share to rivals, like Under Armour and a resurgence of competitor Adidas have been real, I think that they are a little overdone. Nike is still comfortably a solid growth business, having recorded now the 28th straight quarterly increase.

Not only that, I suspect that some of the gizmos that we see (no shoelaces need to be tied ever again) will become more mainstream. Wearable tech. The technology really does change, just look at your latest and older shirts, shorts and shoes, and you will see that this is definitely the case. We continue to accumulate what is a well priced stock of an incredible business with great runway ahead, buy!

The anxieties over future orders seem to have dissipated a little, I suspect that there will be a little momentum for the stock in the coming days and weeks. And who knows, the laggard of the Dow Jones may well be the best catalyst for an assault on 20 thousand points for the Dow Industrials.




Linkfest, lap it up

Looking for places to go, with your hard earned cash? You may have to shell out more than usual here, some beautiful pictures over at Bloomberg - Best Photography of 2016. Ha ha, you have to love the rich people playing croquet in Napa Valley!

We take so many meaningless photos nowadays as the cost is relatively zero, and we can delete as many as we want. It wasn't always so, photos were a fine art back when the digital era didn't exist. So ... the WSJ explores The Best New Ways to Scan Your Old Photos. What you waiting for, get cracking during the holidays.

Bummed that your internet speed is not what you want it to be? South Korea wins again - Average internet speed by country as of 1st quarter 2016 (in Mbps). If you are rich enough to have a fibre line, you are better than most of the average speeds around the world, there is always an upside, right?




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks across Asia are mixed, stocks locally have started mixed. Hey, who cares, the main focus will be the Nike numbers and Dow 20K later today. Or tomorrow. Or next week. And hey, there is a UK GDP read tomorrow!




Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Wednesday, 28 September 2016

Health is Wealth


"Innovation remains a large part of the company. Any runner will tell you that their running shoes over a few decades (they would have to be in their late forties, early fifties) have changed drastically over time. In the old days you had to "run your shoes in". In the Pegasus range, Nike have sold over 50 million pairs since the shoe was introduced."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks slipped here in Jozi after a decent enough start, we were higher to begin with and then that all fell away during the course of the day. In the end we closed at exactly 50900 points on the Jozi all share, down 1.13 percent on the day. Resources were the hardest hit, down nearly two percent on the day, most stocks amongst the majors ended in the red. In fact, most stocks ended in the red, Capitec with results managed to buck the trend, they are adding around 100 thousand customers a month, in the last half. How is that possible, three thousand customers a day? And judging by the size of their loan book, relative to the "big four", they may be scratching the surface. The market rates them at double (and more) the rating of some of the older banks in South Africa. Thus far the company has never delivered short which resulted in an earnings stumble. They continue to prove their naysayers wrong, they continue to attract customers, they continue to innovate and give customers products that they need and want. Credit cards and home loans will be a big push, I am pretty sure that they will get that right.

In the losing column near the top was MTN again, allegations from the Nigerian Senate Floor that the company has illegally repatriated 13.92 billion Dollars over a ten year period. What? As far as I understood it, the Nigerian Central Bank facilitates all of the ins and outs, right? They would know all the flows. The company this morning has suggested that the comments are completely unfounded and without any merit. Yech. More noise that detracts from the core business trying to empower ordinary citizens to get access to the internet. The more investment in the networks, the better and cheaper the internet will get for their users. Data in the developed world, where I am sorry to say this next part, is more business friendly, is more like a utility. And cheaper. So you use more of it across your devices and empower yourself. The better for ordinary citizens. The more you stifle business, the less they will invest. Yech, we watch it.

The other big news on the local front is that Steinhoff have announced that they are issuing shares to a number of parties in order to raise a whole lot of money, in order to shore up cash reserves. The logistics are easy enough to understand, just lean in a little closer to understand the different legs. Firstly, Upington Investment Holdings (a business controlled by the trust of Christo Wiese, who is the biggest shareholder of Steinhoff) will subscribe for 162 million new shares at 5.055 Euros per share (higher than where the stock price traded yesterday). Total proceeds of that, 819 million Euros. Next up, an empowerment deal for 60 million shares with a vehicle called Lancaster 101, facilitated by The Public Investment Corporation (the PIC). That will raise 303 million Euros, same price of 5.055 Euros per share, I am sure there will be more detail in due course.

Next, an "upsize facility" (you thought that was only available at McDonald's, right?) of 110 million shares offered to institutional shareholders via an accelerated bookbuild, price determined via the process. More details on that during the next day or so, I guess. In addition to the 162 million shares that Upington is paying for, the same vehicle is buying another 152 million shares currently classified by the company as Treasury shares (the ones that the company holds). In total, should the full placement of the "upsize facility" take place, the company may raise up to 2.447 billion Euros. Wow. That represents, as part of the closing value last evening, 12.5 percent of the market capitalisation. This is pretty big for the company, and again a sign that Christo Wiese continues to back this team in a significant way. The stock is up over two and a half percent at the get go, the stock has certainly been under the pump lately too!

Over the seas and far away, in New York, New York, stocks rose across the board. The Dow Jones industrial average added nearly three-quarters of a percent, the broader market S&P 500 added nearly two-thirds of a percent. The nerds of NASDAQ performed better than both, 0.92 percent better on the day. Energy was the only real loser on the day, oil prices down as there was no deal reached in Algiers. Yeah, well done chaps, the higher the price goes (the oil price) the more the commercial frackers will produce. Dominance is gone. And, if Clinton has her way, solar energy and alternatives will be a bigger part of the US landscape. The markets seem to suggest that Clinton won the debate, the biggest recipient of flows was the Mexican Peso, which rallied sharply after some recent weakness.




Company corner

Nike no friends. After regular market hours, that is. The biggest sports apparel and sports shoes manufacturer in the western world, and one of the most recognisable brands across the globe, reported numbers last evening for the first quarter of their financial year 2017. At face value they actually look quite good, revenues up 8 percent to 9.1 billion, in constant currencies sales were up 10 percent. Diluted earnings per share clocked 73 cents, up 9 percent when compared to the prior financial year. Here is the reason for Mr. Market being disappointed however, future orders worldwide were only up 5 percent, 7 percent in constant currencies. Here is the thing, Nike touts themselves as a growth company, and whilst I firmly believe that to be true, the company needs to deliver growth in the low to mid teens if they are going to continue to attract a premium multiple to the market.

There is no mistaking that they are a premium brand in athletic wear. There is no doubting that there is a huge push from broader society to get healthier and to get more active. I ran my first half marathon in 1997 I think, I ran my first ultra marathon in 2000. In those days there were a few hundred people in the field. There were very few races in South Africa that you had to enter a month or so before. Comrades, that you could submit your entry around 8 weeks before, there were no caps. Only in 2000 I think there was a cap, then the numbers subsided again. Nowadays, if you don't enter months and months ahead, you are not going to get in. I mean, Two Oceans entires are open already. Nuts!!! They are around halfway through the cap of 11 thousand entrants. I feel tempted .....

Enough about my amateur hap-hazard training regime and running aspirations, Paul is the real revelation around here. He is on a running streak of at least one mile a day for the last two and one quarter years. By my math, that is more than 800 days of running at least one mile a day. At Vestact these exercise regimes are serious business. And I am very sure that we are definitely not alone in this regard, companies are ditching the old ways for encouraging their employees into getting active. As such, all the apparel and shoe businesses globally will benefit from higher sales of athletic wear. This is a global theme. Equally, casual wear has morphed into athletic apparel, the so called "athleisure" category. It is not uncommon to see folks walking around in what looks like athletic clothes, comfortable is the new cool.

CEO Mark Parker had this to say about the general category on the conference call - "The active-wear market continues to outpace the overall apparel and footwear market, which itself continues to outpace global GDP growth." He is equally right here too, in the opening statements of the results release he makes some more good points about the whole sector. It is not just about making the shirts, the pants, the socks, the shoes and so on, the technology associated with the manufacturing process and the experience that the end users get when using the products are just as important nowadays:

    "Q1 also showed how we're amplifying every category through sports style innovation, transforming retail by connecting the digital and physical experience and ushering in a new Era of Personalized Performance - through product, consumer connections and our supply chain. NIKE's strategic investments in these growth opportunities continue to deliver long-term value to our shareholders."


Indeed, they just announced a fairly *nice* partnership with Apple Watch, the Nike only version for runners. What is quite important to note is that the company is not everything to all sports, they saw the decline in golf across North America (participation) and decided enough was enough there. The word golf appears once there.

Other sports and athletes sponsored by Nike had a great time during the last financial quarter to August 31, a first ever all Nike affair in the Euro championship (France vs Portugal), Serena tying the Steffi Graf record of 22 grand slam singles at Wimbledon, 1500 Olympians from 60 countries were sponsored by Nike, winning 189 medals. And of course Neymar kicked the penalty that won Brazil to their first football Olympic gold medal. Mo Farah rocked it, defending both his Olympic titles. Of the 24 members of the Team USA basketball teams at the Olympics (both men and woman USA teams won), 21 wore Nike or Jordan shoes. Make no mistake, Nike (and their peers) make wonderful apparel and shoes.

Innovation remains a large part of the company. Any runner will tell you that their running shoes over a few decades (they would have to be in their late forties, early fifties) have changed drastically over time. In the old days you had to "run your shoes in". In the Pegasus range, Nike have sold over 50 million pairs since the shoe was introduced. That is pretty astonishing, considering that a Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 33 (full name) costs 1799.95 Rand on the online website. Look, running shoes will always be expensive. A single shoe weighs 306 grams, according to the website. For comparisons sake, Nike of course owns Converse (since 2003), and according to Wikipedia, Chuck Taylor All-Stars have sold over 600 million pairs. Surely that must be the best selling shoe of all time? And not the Bata Toughie people ....

So, innovation and pushing the boundaries, more personalisation (you can make your own shoes on the website) will lead to wider margins in time. We continue to see the company as a market leader. That is all very well, that is the company. We can see that it is in good hands, in a good space and has good growth prospects. The stock price on the other hand is at the same level pre-market that it was last June. That is 15 months on and we are basically at the same level. The new buyback program of 12 billion Dollars from last year November has proceeded slowly, the company has bought back only 2.2 billion of the 12 billion Dollar program. Approaching the lows of the last 52 weeks (pre-market indicated 53.89 Dollars versus 12 month low of 51.47 Dollars) means the company may get busy. The market cap is currently around 91 billion Dollars, buying back and retiring around 11-12 percent of the shares in issue has big long term implications.

The market is pricing the stock on 20 times forward earnings for the next financial year. Whilst that is not dirt cheap and equally you are not being handsomely rewarded by way of yield (1.16 percent at current levels), you are still buying a growth business. One should continue to accumulate what is a really quality business at a lower price, you will be well rewarded in the years to come, as will all their competitors no doubt. We maintain our conviction buy recommendation.




Linkfest, lap it up

New technology is helping us discover more about our past. Having the ability to read old scrolls that previously we couldn't because they were too fragile to handle is a huge step forward - Archeologists are virtually unraveling ancient hidden texts that could rewrite biblical history.

Having access to financial products will help the poor. Being able to access credit at a reasonable rate to fund a business with lumpy cash flows is one example. Another is simply just getting interest on money saved, keeping money under the mattress has risks involved and zero interest - Developing nations would be $3.7 trillion richer if more people could handle their finances from their mobile phones. The amount of time that I have saved by using the banking app on my phone is significant.

I know that we produce just short of 100 million barrels of oil a day, I have never thought about what can be produced from it- What Can Be Made from One Barrel of Oil?.






Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks are higher to begin with across the Mzansi landscape, some more than others. Marginally better across Europe in a follow through of the US session. Yeah, we need this, it has been more than a little jittery lately.

Here is a little insight from a friend of the newsletter, into Mexico City, just so you can feel a little better about where you live, or better that it is same-same in other places:

"Greetings from the former Aztec capital. All is well here in that f'ed up, developing-nation way that I suspect a conscientious South African would understand. Violent episodes fill the "penny horrible" newspapers; the Peso is falling; the President is accused of idiocy; they bought Chinese gasoline and that's why the pollution is so bad lately.. etc, etc, etc. In the meantime, friends celebrate birthdays and anniversaries; the mariachi bands keep playing and the mangoes are uniformly excellent. This is a great and ancient city, and don't underestimate the solace that good produce can provide."





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

Nike needs to do it ... and more


"Combining comfortable clothes with an athletic element allow you to work out and then walk around afterwards without feeling exposed. Or just hanging around in athletic gear, even if you are doing nothing athletic during the day. All the big manufacturers of athletic apparel and footwear have as much of a bias towards fashion as they do to functionality."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Huh? I kept asking the fellows in the office whether or not there was a concrete reason why stocks globally were moving so much higher. The reasons given were relief rally, oversold and bargain hunters, and then some of the usual trader talk along the lines of short squeeze this and dead cat bounce that. The origin of the term, dead cat bounce apparently traces its roots to the Far East, two FT journalists quoted a broker who used the analogy. And then it stuck. Now I thought cats were supposed to land on their feet, for starters and secondly, being very good climbers, they wouldn't fall in the first place. What do I know, I am more of a dog person myself. I love the more loyal and slightly dimmer dog, what can I say!

I see in some market reports that a sense of calm has returned. Are you kidding me? British politics looks more polarised and splintered than ever. What matters in those developed economies and societies is that the bureaucratic functions still seem to work well. As many often point out, until recently Italy had more governments than fans had time for managers, yet society still worked. The first Prime Minister of Italy post the second world war held the post no less than 7 times in a 7 year period. For Berlusconi it was four times! Since 2000 it has been relatively stable, with "only" six prime ministers, including Berlusconi twice.

Another major event capturing the news reels this morning, Twitter and all the associated communication platforms is the horrible events at the airport in Turkey. It is just a matter of time before all airports start screening people differently before they arrive any where near the airport terminal. Or, perhaps there can be stronger security outside. I get the sense that sadly we have become desensitised to these very important events, the lives of over 100 people impacted immediately and thousands others indirectly. Perhaps all of us. We live in a world where people will end their own lives and take others with them to strike fear into the hearts of others. I for one can't understand extremists.

Stocks are all up again across the globe. Part of the reason is the fragmented political environment in the UK and that the EU has not received anything formal yet. i.e. Whilst the people had voted to exit, it is actually the politicians who have to formally approach the European Parliament and European Union and start the process. And seeing as the leadership of Labour, old Jeremy Corbyn basically is persona non grata in his own political movement (and the leadership of the ruling party is currently vacant), who exactly is going to negotiate this exit? For now, nobody. There may well be an election in the UK as early as October, that could in essence be another referendum. In the meantime, there are around 6 million people with Irish heritage (including England football captain Wayne Rooney) and many of them are scrambling to become Irish citizens. To stay European, you know!

So what should you continue to do? Nothing. Still nothing. When the dust settles we will have a clearer idea of what to do. Selling in panic is never a good idea. In fact, history will show you that it is a VERY BAD idea. SMH, now I am reading headlines that all asset classes are benefiting from the uncertainty, the fact that there is this political void and seemingly inaction from all corners. Pfff .... the longer I do this, the more I realise that many quarters of the market is like the proverbial Jack Russell chasing their tail. That segment of the market provides us with the necessary liquidity that we so crave however.




Company corner

Nike. This is a company that has just been doing it for a while now, both revenues and profits have been growing sharply, leading to a big earnings multiple expansion and with that a rapidly appreciating share price. Share holders have become used to the idea that the stock has just grown as global and in particular, North American sales have consistently been above expectations. In fact, if you visit the Investor Relations landing page of their website, there is Cristiano Ronaldo running away from the crumbling defence, some figurines exploding. And in bold letters there, it states that Nike is a growth company.

We all know that Athleisure is a "thing". Combining comfortable clothes with an athletic element allow you to work out and then walk around afterwards without feeling exposed. Or just hanging around in athletic gear, even if you are doing nothing athletic during the day. All the big manufacturers of athletic apparel and footwear have as much of a bias towards fashion as they do to functionality. I simply have to recall the old poly shorts and your beat up running shirt to know that fast forward a couple of decades and even the socks are seen as highly important fashion items, as well as being darn comfortable and of course most important, functional. Whether or not, as a casual runner, my times have improved much with all the gear is another matter entirely.

Research from Morgan Stanley (via this - The Rise of Athleisure suggests that as a category (athleisure), the market is now 270 billion Dollars per annum globally and is set to grow around 30 percent before the decade is out. There is still plenty of wriggle room for all providers, inside of the majors competition to Nike have emerged, most especially with Under Armour. Strong personalities such as Steph Curry and Andy Murray, as well as Jordan Spieth, and some other well known US athletes, like Tom Brady. Highlighting the move to all sports and casual wear is that both Misty Copeland (an extremely talented ballerina) and Giselle Bundchen are featured as Under Armour sponsored athletes. Bundchen's husband, Gridiron legend Tom Brady is also sponsored by Under Armour. First husband and wife team? In terms of teams, only Spurs (Harry Kane's team) are one of the big sponsorships.

This is a piece about Nike, not about Under Armour. In order to show how competitive it has been, that is why we spent a little time discussing a competitor. Herewith the fourth quarter and full years results 2016 released last evening. At face value the metrics all look pretty decent. I suspect there were two things that everyone focused on, one was that whilst quarterly earnings were a slim beat, the sinking in that earnings were actually flat on the comparative quarter meant that the recent share price weakness was probably justified. In other words, if you are going to own a growth company, be sure that it is a growth company.

As the company pointed out (see the table below), North American apparel sales were 2 percent lower when measured against the corresponding quarter, 8 percent higher over the year. Total sales (see at the bottom of the table) in North America make up 45.6 percent of group sales. And if those are "sluggish" as the WSJ points out (Nike Reports Sluggish North American Sales), then does the growth tag still hold true? First, here is the long and detailed table of Nike sales across all regions of the world -



I suspect that one can answer the question about growth by pointing to the Chinese region, sales are only 11.7 percent of total sales. In order to determine whether or not the company is a "growth" business, let us throw back to the 2010 annual report. Total sales were 19 billion Dollars, they are now over 32 billion. Greater China sales back then were 1.74 billion Dollars, they are more than double now at 3.785 billion Dollars. In some parts of the world, and in particular a huge market shifting one (the next growth engine in China is largely consumer based) like China, the company is still growing like gangbusters.

I know this is pretty long, I want to however highlight why I think that the future is exceptionally bright for the whole industry and this specific company. The chief Mark Parker (not related to Spiderman) spoke about global sport participation, a move to mobile and importantly, the ability to customise your shoes and clothing, personalised "stuff".

    "Participation is increasing all over the world ..... people are leading healthier, more active lives. At the same time, the rise in sport culture is bringing fitness and style together, profoundly influencing what we all wear every day. It's clear: our amplify category offense is a model that works. We're growing the business across the entire lifestyle of sports - from performance to sportswear.

    And in retail ..... our industry is in the early stages of unprecedented transformation. Mobile innovation and personal services are dominating the landscape. That's why we invest in integrating digital and physical retail seamlessly, giving our consumers better access to the products they want ..... and why we're working even closer with our best wholesale partners who share our vision for the future of retail.

    Manufacturing, too, is undergoing its own revolution. We're rethinking the fundamentals across our business - in how we make products ..... how fast we deliver them ..... and what kind of impact they leave behind. With other innovators like FLEX or HP, we're deploying projects across our source base to reduce costs and delivery time, improve quality, explore customization and enhance performance."


In conclusion, the stock has taken a hammering this year, it is down at 51 Dollars pre market, and now trades on a 23.6x historic multiple, which is possibly at this juncture a fair reflection. We do however believe that the growth will return, the thesis is well intact and this may prove to be a wonderful opportunity to acquire the market leader at a much cheaper price. Across all territories, future orders still look strong, nearly 20 percent up in mainland China. We maintain our buy rating on the company.




Linkfest, lap it up

Another company that takes advantage of the sharing economy is now worth not billions but 10s of billions - Airbnb is raising a new round of funding that would value the company at $30 billion.

Here is an idea of how widespread the company is in major US cities.

Infographic: The Role of Airbnb in U.S. Cities | Statista
You will find more statistics at Statista

Sticking with billion dollar tech companies, here is a list of companies that started in garages - These Billion Dollar Companies Were All Started in Garages.

The latest news from the biggest private tech company - You Can Soon Book a Hot Air Balloon Through Uber.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. As mentioned earlier in the message, stocks are all higher across the globe. The Pound is bouncing off the worst levels, that snarky remark from Nigel Farage that the Euro was "crashing" or some such other way of putting it riled me a little. He would do worse to go and have a look at the 17 year graph of Sterling, the time that he has been a member of the European Parliament. When Farage arrived, it was around 1.55 to the US Dollar, now it is 1.33. Seeing as the Euro was basically accepted at around the same time (1999), the levels to the Dollar have gone from 1.05 (back then) to around 1.10 now. Nigel, update your reality, OK?



Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063