Friday 31 July 2015

The only Hoff that counts



"All the shares here on the JSE will then be owned by a Dutch Holding company, not too dissimilar to the setup that Reinet has, their listing is in Luxembourg. You will then have one share in the Dutch holding company for each one here, think along those lines, at least in percentages. None of this is new news, it is an evolution of the company, the brilliance of that management team and execution."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Another good day for the local equities markets, the all share ended around one-third of a percent better, no thanks to the financials who as a collective fell around half a percent. Sanlam shares sank around three and one-third of a percent if you are looking for a stock price to blame, Sanlam is a business that has a market cap of 144 billion Rand. That is sizeable and is bigger than Nedbank and Remgro. It is double the size of Anglo American Platinum and four times the size of Kumba Iron Ore, yet they seem to just get on with their business. The stock has only been available on the JSE since 1998 when it demutualised and since then has been a steady and decent payer. It probably is one of the most widely held stocks on the JSE, if you check their annual report then you see that there are 477 thousand shareholders who have 12.5 percent of the shares in issue, most of them have less than 1000 shares.



The other company that demutualised at about the same time, Old Mutual, they would also have a large amount of shareholders, not so? Their share register is a little more complicated than Sanlam, as they are listed in London too, as well as Zimbabwe. Here you go, 62 thousand odd shareholders (possibly all Zimbabwe and South Africa) own 1000 shares or less in Old Mutual.



So there you go, the most widely held shares in South Africa, as far as I can tell are both the Sanlam and Old Mutual shareholders. Most important question, do all of these people know that they are shareholders? Most people would be aware, yet they could have moved, and not know. What then happens to the share that remain in place at Computershare or Link, the transfer secretaries. There must be laws in place that clean up "stale" shareholders. Normally, and this happened with Naspers (unfortunately), the company makes an odd lot offer, in this case they may buy back all your shares if you have less than a certain number, say, 500 shares or so.

The company needs to have the ammo, I am all for retail investors paying attention and getting invested, these two cases are possibly different, people were "given" the stock as they were policy holders of investments or life insurance products. I got some shares, I sold them to pay for parts of my wedding, they were most useful back then. I knew I had them however. How many hundreds, if not thousands of people know that they do not have the shares? I suspect many, and that in itself confirms many things, if you pay for shares with your own money, you know you have them, right? If anything is just given to you, the value is almost always less in your books, tell me if I am wrong.

Over the seas and far away, stocks pared their losses, the broader market S&P 500 closed out flat on the session, after being down half a percent at the open. US GDP for the second quarter, the first read was a little light. People have shifted their expectations of an interest rate hike to later in the year, it could be the first quarter of next year. Byron is hoping for that in the predictions markets, he is long that question like a crazy person. Outliers. If you are looking to get interested in prediction markets, you should, visit Inkling. Try it, it will make you a better forecaster.




Company corner

What is up with Steinhoff, what was that yesterday? The company announced a convertible bond offering. When you buy debt from a business and convert it to equity, that is what a convertible bond is. It does two things, one, it dilutes you the shareholder, it also gives you as the shareholder less obligations to the bond holders. In effect, the party holding the convertible bond will be paid a regular coupon payments (interest), in this case with Steinhoff it is 1.25 percent.

Which you may well say is an awesome outcome for the company, managing to raise 1.116 billion Euros (at an exchange rate of 13.90 Rand to the Euro) for 6 years. Steinhoff has the option to redeem the outstanding bonds (pay them out the principal and accrued interest) by September 1 2019 if the parity value of the Bonds translated into Euro at the prevailing exchange rate exceeds EUR 130,000 for a specified period. Understood all of that?

As they point out, the initial conversion price represents a 35 percent premium to the volume weighted average price (WVAP) of the ordinary price on the JSE, in other words 103.46 (and some change) Rands a share. That part is easily understandable, the price at which it becomes attractive for the convertible bond holders to convert debt to equity is around 140 Rand a Steinhoff share, that is my best guess. The bonds will convert (if chosen) to around 150 million Steinhoff shares, which as the announcement points out is 4.1 percent of the issued share capital.

Also, whilst Steinhoff were at it, below the announcement of the issuance (convertible debt is to be issued in Austria), they explain what the funds will be used for. Further share repurchases to manage and counter dilution, as well as for general corporate purposes. I am still trying to wrap my head around that.

Most exciting however is the potential listing of Steinhoff on the "Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange" accompanied by an inward listing on the JSE. This will take place in the fourth quarter of this year. And this part is also interesting: "It is anticipated that a Dutch incorporated holding company will acquire all of the issued shares in Steinhoff in exchange for shares in the Dutch holding company, by way of a scheme of arrangement pursuant to the South African Companies Act, 2008."

OK? So all the shares here on the JSE will then be owned by a Dutch Holding company, not too dissimilar to the setup that Reinet has, their listing is in Luxembourg. You will then have one share in the Dutch holding company for each one here, think along those lines, at least in percentages. None of this is new news, it is an evolution of the company, the brilliance of that management team and execution. Having done some hard charging, Steinhoff have ended up with principally a European business. As such the inward listing on the JSE and principal listing on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange is justified.

And before all of that happens, Steinhoff are expected to report numbers in September, there should be a decrease in earnings as a result of all the massive deal related activities that have seen the number of shares in issue increase substantially. There are now 3.667 billion shares in issue, there was half that in 2013. Such has been the pace of deal making, acquiring JD Group (second time lucky) and Pepkor. Pursuing a strategy that has certainly worked well for them, the number of shares in issue in June 2005 was less than one-third of what it is now. That is not for the purists, this company is certainly run by some hard charging and very hungry individuals, Markus Jooste (53), Danie van der Merwe (56), Frikkie Nel (55) and Piet Ferreira (59) are up for it. After all, 50 is the new 30, right?

If you do not own any of these shares, you should. They are likely to report earnings per share marginally lower than last year, the Frankfurt listing could see a potential re-rating of the stock, and the dividend policy from here might change a little as the business "matures" in the coming three to five years. September, we wait for that sports lovers.




Linkfest, lap it up

Here is the only thing you have to watch today, it is a clip shared by Mark Zuckerberg about the completed construction of our first full scale aircraft. The aircrafts are expected to stay in the air for a time of 3 months at a time and use lasers to transmit internet connectivity to each other and then beam the content down to users, using radio waves!

Glad to see these guys are back on the air. I think this is a great way for Amazon to get more attention to their Prime offering - Amazon Prime sign Top Gear's Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May for exclusive new show

Increased efficiency benefits everyone and with ships getting bigger and an ever increasing tonnage of goods shipped globally, making the canal bigger is a great project - 6 facts about the second Suez Canal






Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets are lower here, I noticed that the gold stocks were down, the Harmony ADR was below 1 Dollar, around 95 US cents, which means sadly that it is a penny stock. I am pretty sure however that Steinhoff was once a smaller company than Harmony. So I decided to have a look. In June of 2005, at the end of Harmony's financial year, there were 393.3 million shares in issue, the share price was 58.25 Rand. That is around 22.9 billion Rand market cap back then.

At the same time, Steinhoff had 1.13 billion shares in issue, the share price was 15.40 Rand at the end of the period. 17.4 billion market cap, relative to the 22.9 billion of Harmony. Today? Last evening, Harmony closed up shop with a market cap of 5.3 billion Rand, Steinhoff were 281 billion Rand. They are both South African companies, their respective industries have just done a whole lot differently. Yet the nature of people is to see the "bad" and not the good that is Steinhoff and their successes. Ah well, that is their loss.

Markets are almost flat here mid morning. The Dollar continues to make progress against all currencies, emerging market currencies as a collective are at a 14 odd year low to the Greenback.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Thursday 30 July 2015

Monetising mobile for days



"What is telling is that whilst the US (and Canada) accounts for only 213 million monthly users of the service (Facebook), that being 14.3 percent, those users are responsible for 48.6 percent of all revenues. Yet Average Revenue per User (ARPU's) are a paltry 9.3 Dollars in that region. In Europe, ARPUs are 3.36 Dollars apiece, currency headwinds there no doubt."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Most stocks enjoyed a cracking day on the local front, most of it towards the last hour. Industrials and resources added a whopping 1.8 percent apiece, the overall market rallied one and two-thirds of a percent by the end of the market. I saw some decent numbers from LVMH which lifted Richemont, British America Tobacco had results that were welcomed by Mr. Market, trading at an all time high in Rand terms. It seems that until revenues decline, or profits decline, the market will ignore steadily shrinking volumes, focusing on the dividends instead. I guess whilst we live in a world of low returns, yield on offer will be snapped up.

Talking of which, Janet Yellen and the FOMC indicated that rates are going to go up, some suggest that this may not even happen this year. All eyes on the incoming data however, most of the labour related (and to a lesser extent housing) data has been good, some of the consumer data has been average. As the data comes in, the Fed will watch it. Everyone will watch it. The Fed will act accordingly. I even saw someone take the previous meetings statement and this one, and mesh the words together. For what? To see the subtle differences and try, as I have seen over the years, people interpret Fedspeak. Fedspeak is a fictional language of the all seeing and knowing, not too dissimilar to Big Brother, right? No, they react to the same data, gather data of their own and make decisions based on that. For the full statement, check it out here: July 29, 2015.

The last line as I interpret it, is that the Fed will reach a lower high on the interest rate cycle, i.e. technological advancements will mean real growth is lower for now, building in massive productivity gains in time. Here goes: "The Committee currently anticipates that, even after employment and inflation are near mandate-consistent levels, economic conditions may, for some time, warrant keeping the target federal funds rate below levels the Committee views as normal in the longer run." So there will continue to be a "search for yield", as fixed income remains lower, the good thing is that the same technological gains we are talking about above translate to lower inflation. That is my interpretation, like almost everything in life, people see things from their point of view.

After all was said and done, the broader market S&P 500 advanced nearly three quarters of a percent, the nerds of NASDAQ added 0.44 percent whilst the Dow Jones was a little better than two thirds of a percent. If you are looking for data today, then look no further than second quarter GDP, the "advanced" estimate. This is the first read, it is updated, called the "second estimate" and then finalised and called the third estimate in late September. So, I am pretty sure that all and sundry will pay attention to the data today, it certainly does not get much better than that. And then next week, the non-form payroll numbers. In our world these numbers could be anything, what matters to us is company profitability, the companies we own. The economy is what it is, the best policy makers are making sure that they stick to their mandate. Keep calm and carry on.




Company corner

Facebook. Something your parents did not have, heck they had no idea what a personal computer was, that was something that you only saw around the late eighties. My dad got a Commodore 64, that was the first time that I ever saw something that awesome. It did not capture me straight away, it took a while. I can't even say that I was quick on the draw with Facebook, Twitter I was a little early, Instagram I was way early. WhatsApp, I am getting better at that.

Facebook owns three of those, the one they do not own reported Wednesday and the stock sank to 31 Dollars. Sis. Hint, Twitter. Facebook reported half year and second quarter results last evening. Just after the market closed, a few minutes, the conference call was a full hour later which is the norm. What is really awesome for the people living on the West Coast of the US (or Canada, the weather in Vancouver is good at this time of the year) is that you get longer days, if you are in the market. Markets close at 1pm San Fransisco time, if you are in finance in that part of the world, you can start real early and finish early!

A reminder (if you needed one), what is Facebook? As per their website: "Facebook's mission is to give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected. People use Facebook to stay connected with friends and family, to discover what's going on in the world, and to share and express what matters to them." Opinions are like you-know-what, everyone has one. The company employs nearly 11 thousand people, aptly its headquartered at 1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park. Not the Pretoria one, rather in California.

The board is pretty interesting, consisting of Peter Thiel (PayPal fame), who was an early funder, Reed Hastings, the Netflix founder, Erskine Bowles, a former White House Chief of Staff and ex director at Morgan Stanley, Sheryl Sandberg who is an ex-Googler and COO at Facebook, as well as Susan Desmond-Hellmann who is the CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Fancy that Bill Gates took a swipe at Mark Zuckerberg, that must have been a little awkies (urban dictionary translates awkies to awkward). Who did I miss, oh, Marc Andreessen, the guy who sold Netscape to AOL for 4.2 billion Dollars.

That took place back when the Zuck was still in high school, attending the pretty exclusive Phillips Exeter Academy. The most recent notable alumni is the chap who acted as Dewey in Malcolm in the Middle, the younger brother of Malcolm. The writer of the popular Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown also went there. Enough about schools, one could talk about that all day long.

OK, let us focus on the numbers, revenue for the quarter topped 4 billion Dollars for the first time (4.04), a beat, EPS clocked 50 cents for the quarter, also a beat by three cents. They nearly reached one and a half billion users, also a beat. 1.49 billion. Facebook now has more global users than any country on the planet has citizens. The universe of the Facebook! The only "miss" in terms of what the street was looking for was daily active users, that number was a very impressive 968 million. What is pretty telling is that 65 percent of all users make this part of their daily routine. 844 million people are daily mobile active users, outnumbering desktop users 7 to 1.

I think, when you dig through the presentation slides for Q2 that when you see Facebook daily active user growth in Canada and the US slowing, you understand Twitter's problems. As we well know, Twitter is not Facebook. Facebook has more users in Europe than the US, in fact, US Facebook user growth is flat over two years, relatively speaking. Facebook has more monthly users in Europe than Twitter has entire subscribers. Asia Pacific and "Rest of the World" account for nearly two-thirds of all users. According to their about us section, 83.1 percent of the daily active users are from outside the US and Canada.

Mobile only users (those who sign in from their smartphone exclusively) are 655 million of the 1.49 billion, a fairly sizeable number. So those are the users, Facebook revenue grew nearly 40 percent, daily users in terms of subscribers grew 17 percent. I suspect that there will be a time that they "mature" in terms of subscriber numbers, if there is a such a thing with this company.

What is telling is that whilst the US (and Canada) accounts for only 213 million monthly users of the service (Facebook), that being 14.3 percent, those users are responsible for 48.6 percent of all revenues. Yet Average Revenue per User (ARPU's) are a paltry 9.3 Dollars in that region. In Europe, ARPUs are 3.36 Dollars apiece, currency headwinds there no doubt. In the rest of the world, that number plunges to a mere 90 cents per user. There is certainly loads of scope for the company to earn, via their advertising channels across their platforms a whole lot more money. There are still many businesses advertising in the "old" ways, I know that it works for certain businesses.

Believe it or not, there is a whole lot more to Facebook than your news feed, find all their Products, which I see includes Instagram there. I see. Not Oculus and not WhatsApp. The amazing thing about Instagram is that it is not even five years old, October is the big hip, hip, hooray. And here is a less known fact, the Instagram app is only available for people using iPhones and smartphones with Android software.

The first photo was taken on the 6th of October 2010 and featured a golden retriever, taken and uploaded by the founder, Kevin Systrom, of his girlfriend's dog. Yes, whilst old Kevin has 1.1 million users, his girlfriend Nicole has fewer, yet she looks like (from her feed), she has a new golden retriever. Kevin has posted only 1425 times, less than 1 a day since he founded the business. I guess he has been busy, amongst other things, selling it to Facebook for 1 billion Dollars, along with cofounder Mike Krieger. 13 other employees shared 100 million Dollars, a pretty mean payday. See the original picture below, great dog, dodgy flip-flops.



Wall Street analysts (I have seen this) have valued Instagram alone at 35 billion Dollars, says Mark May at Citi. Kevin Systrom still runs the joint, good for him, the transaction did have shares, I am sure he isn't struggling. WhatsApp has double the number of users that Instagram has, 600 million as at January this year to 300 million for Instagram as of last December. Jan Koum, the WhatsApp founder and CEO is a board member, we forgot to mention that above. And Facebook own these all, they bought Whatsapp for 16 billion Dollars, and Oculus, the Rift will be released in the first quarter next year. Virtual reality, allowing you to be at the cricket, when you are actually in your living room.

Facebook, the original (only 11 years old) platform has plenty of road, video sharing is growing like gangbusters. I guess the hardware and the software that we have and use have made that all possible. The greatest anxiety when the company listed three and a half years ago was that they were unable to monetize mobile, 75 percent of revenues are now from mobile. The Zuck is on it, people laughed when he bought Instagram, WhatsApp, he certainly has the execution spot on so far. He surrounds himself with incredibly talented people too, and yet is seemingly accessible to the outside world, travelling and speaking. He certainly is a modern day Thomas Edison, an inventor, a person who is hell bent on changing the world. And in doing that, the company will continue to be profitable too. The marginal swoon after-hours to just below 95 Dollars still represents a strong buying opportunity, we remain long the shares of this business. Stick that in your status bar for "likes".




Cerner stock roared up 7 percent and some change last evening. We had been expecting some sort of announcement about the contract to digitise the medical records of the military in the US (yes really, we were watching this one) and whilst Cerner was in the running, there were other service providers. In fact a more fancied crowd called Epic Systems, a private healthcare systems provider. The contract, awarded by the Department of Defense (with an s) to overhaul all of the military health records of current and past military personal, will be several parties, including Cerner. It will take ten years to digitally migrate documents of nearly 10 million past and present records. Nice, good work and unexpected.




Linkfest, lap it up

We give gold a very hard time, here is a piece to show that we try stay neutral when looking at the data - Actually, gold RISES after rate hikes begin. The two big take aways from the piece are: "Most people read a few things here or there and just run their mouths, without worrying so much about the actual data." and "The other takeaway is that anything can happen, even the most unexpected thing"

Having order and set systems in place for drones is a vital component to have before drones become mass market - Amazon unveils drone traffic control system at NASA centre

Enough sleep is important, there are a growing number of studies which point to the long and short term negative impacts of lack of sleep - The Walking dead. So how Much Sleep Do We Really Need?






Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Ahh, the Shanghai market is up, I guess that is all that counts these days, according to the screens that we watch. Dale Steyn, he has taken 400 wickets, only the 13th person to ever achieve this in test cricket. That is pretty amazing, he hardly fits the mould, a surfer and fisherman in his spare time, longish hair and a whole lot of body art, I guess this is 2015 however, anything goes, right?




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Tuesday 28 July 2015

Shang High and Low



"In China I guess what we have to remember is that participation in the equities market is something that is relatively new, the Chinese stock exchange as we pointed out the other day only restarted in 1991. Before that I am guessing that it was cash, or there was very little savings as the economy has grown 25 fold since back then. By contrast the market has woefully underperformed the broader stock market, over a decade and a half the Chinese stock market is up a little over 200 percent."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Locally stocks sank ever so slightly, led lower by industrials, resource stocks bounced as the Rand weakened. More specifically, gold shares bounced hard off very depressed levels, some individual stocks up as much as 7 or 8 percent. Wow, if nothing the ride is wild, although it seems more like a B24 riddled with holes rather than a cruise where the pilots are in control.

Construction group Group 5 confirmed how tough it is out there with a poorly received trading statement, sadly for shareholders the stock sank nearly 13 percent. The stock now trades at a 52 week low, as far as I can tell, the government employees pension fund is the largest shareholder here with a little over 15 percent of the shares in issue. The one thing that I will give the company is that they have consistently paid a dividend through the good and bad times, an unbroken streak (on both the final and interim) back to the 1970's. As far as I can tell. To put that into perspective, Murray & Roberts have paid only one dividend since the World Cup was held here in 2010, Wilson Bayly has also managed to pay through the cycle. Ditto Raubex, perhaps it is just a Murrays "problem".

Their share prices have barely budged over ten years, the share price of Group 5 is up 35 percent in that time, Murray & Roberts share price is down nearly 12 percent in that time (and they did a rights issue), Raubex has been listed sine the first half of 2007 and their share price is basically flat over that time (up 2 percent), the surprise is Wilson Bayly, up 205 percent over that time horizon. Stefanutti Stocks also listed in 2007 (I remember that you could not get shares for love or money at the IPO), that share price is down basically two-thirds since then. Only WBHO has managed to deliver their shareholders a decent return over ten years, it does not "feel" like it, with the last five years the stock returning minus ten percent. With the stock at 96 Rand, it is back at levels last seen in 2007.

So surely, being exceptional as a species in pattern recognition (those Impala never learn), now is a "good time to buy"? I think that as investors for retail clients, there are always going to be some sectors that one must avoid and construction businesses are sadly those. Feast or famine, from peak to trough the cycles are higher and deeper than most. Some of the most amazing people work in these industries, yet they tend to have low margins perpetually, project overruns that are costly and unforeseen costs that impact heavily on profitability. Yet, it is one of those highly skilled industries (not too dissimilar to airlines) that attracts talent without the commiserate shareholder returns.

Like a good opening batsman, to use a cricket analogy, to leave a ball and in this case investment alone is an investment decision in itself. My u15 cricket coach (who was also our headmaster) was a huge fan of Geoff Boycott. He himself had represented Eastern Province and Rhodesia as it was known back then at both rugby and cricket, and he used to tell us (the only year I opened the batting) that the best shot sometimes was no shot at all. Following the Geoff Boycott approach, that you could not get out if the ball wasn't hitting the stumps and you left it alone. It made for boring watching I am sure, once I batted for over four hours and didn't even make forty, what a snore. Last out too. Remember that in an investment world where you cannot own everything, and in fact will not own the vast majority of stocks, sometimes it is about the stocks that you avoid (shoulder arms) just as much as the companies that you choose to be in your investment portfolio.

Warren Buffett uses the baseball analogy where he can never strike out and has the luxury of endless pitches. He is quoted as saying: "What's nice about investing is you don't have to swing at pitches. You can watch pitches come in one inch above or one inch below your navel and you don't have to swing. No umpire is going to call you out. You can wait for the pitch you want." Perhaps Buffett, as a man of patience, as you should be as an investor, would enjoy cricket a little more than baseball. There are some industries for retail investors that are way too cyclical to be reliably invested in, be more opening batsman and patient.

Chinese stock markets on the other hand are more of a dasher, a little like Adam Gilchrest. In recent times however, the last couple of months the lookalike resembles an 8 year old dressed up in oversized pads, so much so that the walk to the crease takes five minutes and takes the form of a straight legged shuffle. Awkward stance, poor execution and generally beginner stuff. The Chinese market has somehow captured our imagination as something that is "very important" right now. Yet, as Larry Fink of Blackstone points out, the very nature that they are volatile is a sign of immaturity. He does not mean that in a condescending way, it is merely an observation that the capital markets in China are not well formed, in the US where liquidity, participation and price discovery are amongst older and wiser sets of investors, there is less angst.

In China I guess what we have to remember is that participation in the equities market is something that is relatively new, the Chinese stock exchange as we pointed out the other day only restarted in 1991. Before that I am guessing that it was cash, or there was very little savings as the economy has grown 25 fold since back then. By contrast the market has woefully underperformed the broader stock market, over a decade and a half the Chinese stock market is up a little over 200 percent. And that counts a 70 percent move in equities over the last 12 months. With all these wild moves, you would expect the Chinese market to be trading at 40-50 times earnings, right? Yet the Shanghai Stock Exchange website tells me that stocks trade at less than 19 times earnings. In fact, 18.33 times. Which is not cheap nor is it overvalued, the market itself is worth 30.3 trillion Yuan, which is around 4.88 trillion Dollars. Less than 50 percent of the economy, again, that hardly sounds like something that you should be worried about.

So whilst there exists a culture of betting in China, limited access to assets globally and a large numbers of retail investor accounts are going to have an impact. And a more pronounced one at that, remembering that government holds large parts of the market, so the "free float" is likely to be lower. Yet having said all of that, according to the FT article titled Myth of China's retail investors understates large players' role, from two weeks ago, only 11 percent of households in China have brokerage accounts. In the US, according to a Gallup poll, 55 percent of households in the US have brokerage accounts.

I don't know what to think, personally I do not know a single investor that owns mainland Chinese shares (do you?), let alone how it could lead to a stock market sell off that would be fundamentally driven. i.e. Earnings are markedly lower as a result of it. I suppose if retail investors in China are stung their spending habits could be impacted, as the FT article points out, there are fewer households than you think. And if the balance of the equity market investors are up as much as the market over the last 12 months, surely there could be positive signs from a wealth effect point of view? Again, I do not know the answer to that, what I do think is that this is completely overdone from a news point of view. Stay calm, stay invested.

Lastly, let us add this answer I gave to a client, first, his specific question (amongst others) in an email sent to me:

    "Wanted to quickly ask what your position is on Naspers at the moment? Do you still think it is a hold? and how you feel about the Chinese propping up that market?"



And then my answer to him, which I tried to match above:

    "We do not have any Chinese stock market exposure, remember that Tencent is listed in Hong Kong, and not Shanghai or Shenzhen, that is where the volatility is. I don't believe that it is a good idea, propping up markets and intervening, those are weak capital markets. Hong Kong is very mature, relatively speaking. Chinese government has a different agenda, to keep people "happy". I think at face value the whole market in Shanghai is not stretched. It does not trade at 100 times, it is closer to 20, actually. So, do nothing with Naspers, if anything, use this as an opportunity to add some more shares."



Does that all make sense to you? right now the Chinese market is down over three percent (not another day like yesterday) whilst Tencent is trading up three quarters of a percent in Hong Kong, that illustrates the point that I am trying to make. Yet ironically, Tencent trades at nearly 30 times forward earnings, much more expensive than the rest of the Chinese market.




Linkfest, lap it up

If you read our blog regularly you will know that we are not fans of Gold. Here is why we say so - The Worst "Investment" Ever?. Also remember that the gold price dropped during 2008 like every other asset class. It only picked up when the words QE started to emerge, people bought gold because they thought inflation was coming due to QE not because it is a "safe asset".



This is the way that producing fresh food is going - Chicago is about to get the world's largest rooftop greenhouse, and it's the size of an entire city block. It will still be a very long time until the majority of fresh produce is grown in the same city than the consumers, here is the first step to get there.

This is a long article on one persons in-depth research into the GMO argument - Unhealthy Fixation. Any data can be manipulated to say more or less what you want it to say. I think that GMO foods allow us to produce food at far cheaper prices allowing people to have more disposable income, which is very positive for the poorest of the poor.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Shanghai markets are alight, green, which is not good when you are talking about Chinese markets. Green is down and red is up, perhaps it has something to do with the communist party. Red symbolises good luck in Chinese culture, as well as happiness. Phew, that means that we would have been really happy here lately!




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Monday 27 July 2015

Stryking Gold



"There are many reasons to own this company, they will remain at the cutting edge of technological innovation in the healthcare industry, their products are highly regarded by professionals. That is always the most important thing for me, you can have the most amazing product, if there is no demand, you go nowhere. Stryker will see more and more demand in the years to come, as the middle class population globally continues to grow and age too, they will enter new geographies"




To market to market to buy a fat pig. Another accelerated sell off in the afternoon, resource stocks bearing the brunt of a stronger Dollar and the demand side looking ropey. The supply side is coming on stream with multiple mega projects all at the same time. We are stuck with a commodities cycle that is resembling the previous ones, lack of supply, higher demand, long time frames with projects, loads of investments, demand cools, mega projects come on line as that happens. Although I guess that each and every cycle is very different from one another, China has certainly changed the economic fabric of the planet that we live on.

The Chinese economy is 25 times bigger now than it was in 1990. The Japanese economy is only around two-thirds bigger, the US economy is nearly three times the size it was in 1990. As China has more people than those two countries put together, the ability to continue to shift the economy around from a central planning point of view, still exists. Whether or not you or I might think it is right is meaningless, it is someone else's reality. There are more economic freedoms now in China than there ever were in the past, even if the communist party is still in charge and the perceptions are that corruption is rife. Obviously the current dispensation realises that the success of managing the people from ivory towers depends on slowly giving people more freedoms, even if that means setting your political ideology up for extinction at some stage.

All I am saying is that the great Chinese miracle set the stage for greater resource demand than we had ever seen before, and whilst it is not likely to end any time soon, the pace is slowing. China is slowing their commodity consumption to be roughly the size of their economy relative to the globe, there is going to be pain felt in the prices. I saw a puzzling tweet on the weekend from Zwelinzima Vavi: "Union haters who blame unions for a fall of commodity prices consider these facts: 50% of SA workers earn below R3033. 60% living in poverty". I am pretty sure that he knows that commodity prices are set by supply and demand, least cost producers survive and the economics of keeping unprofitable shafts open takes hold. Nearly half of all costs of mining is labour, it is not 5 percent. These companies are not profitable and more importantly, if they are unlikely to be a good investment, they will not attract capital.

Mind you, who am I to say that? Allan Gray have been accumulating shares in Harmony Gold, they now own more shares than African Rainbow Minerals, 15.38 percent to be exact. The company traded at the lowest level I think I have ever seen it Friday, below 12 Rand a share, the entire market cap is 5.2 billion Rand. AdvTech is a bigger business! That makes sense, as an economy matures should services and retail not form bigger parts of the economy.

If you think that ONLY local businesses have their heads on the block, you are wrong, the FT (subscription only) has this article that stands out this morning: Shares in Australia's Atlas Iron sink 70%. Cost of production is at 50 Dollars a ton. Where the current price is. The company tried to raise money at a discount to the market, 5 Aussie cents (nearly 60 percent discount to the last traded price months ago, the stock has been suspended) and the demand was not there. There has been a strike on investment, due to lower prices and higher costs. The upshot of it all? It may mean that a 15 million tonnes targeting by Atlas may be reduced to zero by next year, absolute zero in a business sense is worse than zero Kelvin (you chemistry freaks know what I am talking about), it means shut down.

And those who have crunched the supply demand fundamentals reckon that there is between 100 and 200 million tonnes of capacity that needs to come offline. All the smaller producers lose, the main ones can drive down their costs further and be break even below 20 Dollars a tonne, sadly not everyone is there. Producers like Fortescue (4th largest after the top three; Vale, Rio and BHP) are probably OK, other marginal producers like Atlas are on the edge. Sad and true all at the same time, this is the nature of the beast I am afraid. If you think about it, advancements in recycling are bound to drive investment in that sector, thus reducing the need for more raw materials. India remains the elephant in the room, will their infrastructural development programs reach those in size and scale of the Chinese? Perhaps.

For the time being I keep recalling that line over and over, "a bet on commodities is a bet against humanity" and what it means for the major producers. i.e. With all the advancements that we make in the fields of alternative and Green energy, sun, wind, rain, tides, geothermal heat and err .... Tesla?, does that mean we continue to move further away from the older technologies? It does come down to the money, when alternatives become viable as the price drops, those get used and by extension become cheaper and cheaper. We are about to find out this week, all the oil majors are likely to announce massive investment cuts which will be good for the oil price in the short term, no doubt. And a more expensive oil price is better for alternatives in the end.

At the end of the local session the Jozi all share had fallen by 1.69 percent. Phew. Commodity stocks were down a whopping 3.49 percent. Platinum miners were down 4 percent, the gold stocks down over five. Mr. Market was unimpressed. Equally over the seas in the US, stocks were down around one percent by the time all was said and done. A pretty average day all around, Visa, Stryker, Starbucks and Amazon bucking the trend, all with decent results.




I sit amazed in my world each and every day, the engineering feats that humans have achieved, yet many take it for granted, over and over again. I was talking to a wonderful man, a pilot in his sixties and I said that flying amazes me and yet many travellers are completely uninspired by all of it. He said to me that it is still amazes him, and he must have done it thousands and thousands of times, that is pretty pleasing I guess. You can plug the coordinates into one of those massive planes and the error is three metres, somewhere on the other side of the world. If that does not amaze you, then I guess nothing will. As we discussed and I had this same conversation with a another pilot, people are not amazed and expect a hotel in the sky, there is a reason that the airbus is called a bus, the travel is more like a bus, and not a restaurant or hotel in the sky. That was called a Zeplin and was very unsafe.

Low cost airlines have only been around since 1990. That was the first time that bums on seats exceeded the 1 billion passenger market per annum for the very first time. Beijing airport overtook London as the busiest airport in 2010 (this all dovetails nicely with the piece above), over 3 billion people flew in 2013. Predictions suggest that we are going to close in on 4 billion passengers travelling by 2018, over 6 billion by 2030 will fly each and every year. Obviously there is a multitude of people who fly regularly. And to think that in 1950, around 50 million people per annum flew. The fear of flying is obviously a control thing, it is safer than all other modes of transport, including on foot where your chances of getting injured whilst walking and texting are higher than when you fly. Yet we all do it.




Company corner

Stryker reported second quarter numbers on Thursday evening, raising their guidance for the year on an improved outlook. To borrow a line from Jim Cramer, there is always someone making money in some market. You can try, yet you will never suppress human ingenuity. We have seen technological advances in the fields of medicine, and that continues to be the case with improved hardware and software across all fields. They augment each other well, the science of medicine is more receptive to these changes. As per their website, Stryker "offers a diverse array of innovative products and services in Orthopaedics, Medical and Surgical, and Neurotechnology and Spine, which help improve patient and hospital outcomes."

The products includes bone cutters, surgical equipment, hospital beds, reconstructive products, like hips, knees, ankles, as well as the spine and craniomaxillofacial. Huh? Face reconstruction, people have accidents and need to be fixed. This is the technology age, where humans are being given a new lease on life with their new machine made products. And the richer that people get, the longer they live as a result of improved diets, improved science around exercising and improved medicine, the more commonplace these procedures will become. Even hip replacements are more prevalent now than ever before.

Germany and Switzerland sit above the OECD average of 154 per 100,000 people, with 296 and 287 respectively, in places like Chile and Mexico, that number drops to well below 20 per 100 thousand. Diets, average age, longevity, these are all reasons that people are receiving more and more procedures to improve their lives. If you think about it, when you part way with your money here to invest in a business like Stryker, you are allocating capital to a business that wants to advance humanity, to fix and repair ordinary people. So much so that this company has increased sales tenfold over a period of 20 years, through the worst financial crisis of our time.

This is still very much US based business, and that is why it is exciting. 70 percent of their sales comes from their "home", nowadays many businesses want to be multinationals, you cannot confine yourself to x number of customers only. Breaking down some of their other revenue numbers, orthopaedics represents 42 percent of group sales. MedSurg (cute name for Medical and Surgical) represents 39 percent of total sales, these two businesses are their two pillars for now.

Numbers going forward, the range in EPS is expected to be 5.06 to 5.12 Dollars, which means forward with the stock at 100.97 Dollars trades just less than 20 times. Currently the yield is less than 1.4 percent. They still plan to buy back around 2 billion Dollars worth of shares in the next two to three years as they see fit. This is a company that will continue to consolidate the industry, on the conference call the CEO (President and Chairman) of the company, Kevin Lobo said that mergers and acquisitions is their first priority and use of cash. Share buybacks seem pretty aggressive, dividends seem a little lower on the chain of importance. Recently the company bought a Turkish hospital bed manufacturer, located in Kayseri. Turkey's fastest growing city, it is no coincidence that this is an economic free zone.

There are many reasons to own this company, they will remain at the cutting edge of technological innovation in the healthcare industry, their products are highly regarded by professionals. That is always the most important thing for me, you can have the most amazing product, if there is no demand, you go nowhere. Stryker will see more and more demand in the years to come, as the middle class population globally continues to grow and age too, they will enter new geographies. The future is bright for them and their products, as it is with the whole industry, we continue to recommend this company as a buy.




Linkfest, lap it up

You do not eat that much chocolate, or do you? According to Statista, The World's Biggest Chocolate Consumers are the Swiss, 9kgs per person per year. A normal Toblerone bar is 35 grams (plastic packaging), normal size 200g, the tin foil and cardboard packaging. 45 of those a year! Yowsers. Just BTW (by the way), Toblerone is owned by Mondelez, the confectionary company spun off from Kraft, it has a market cap of 68.3 billion Dollars.

Seeing is believing, the NYT (New York Times) reports that Americans Are Finally Eating Less, children are eating 9 percent less. And as per the article: "the amount of full-calorie soda drunk by the average American has dropped 25 percent since the late 1990s". Continue to avoid Coca-Cola as an investment?

These numbers show that where you are born and grow up has a big bearing on where you end up - This chart shows that your parents' income determines your future. How much of the gap do you think is due to life lessons taught by the parents (Rich dad, Poor dad). How much does the education and connections that you have play a role? Do more affluent families have more confidence in themselves so they step out and take the risks that pay the rewards? Very few people can just coast based on their parents legacy. For most people to stay in the income bracket that they are accustomed to, it still requires hard work and smart life decisions.



This vaccine will make a huge difference for the most venerable in our society. Consider that half a million people die from Malaria a year - A malaria vaccine nearly 30 years in the making just got a green light from EU regulators.

Always take research results with a pinch of salt because there are many ways to interoperate the same data and you can skew outcomes based on what data you choose to focus on. This is still interesting though - Too much TV could raise the risk of Alzheimer's, study suggests. The article also shows that physical activity increases cognitive function, which many studies have shown and I can say is true for me. So spend less time watching TV, go to the gym and then buy some Nike shares.

Many people can't afford a Ferrari but now you can own the shares - Ferrari IPO Seen Giving Boost to Demand for Supercar Brand




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Our market is up today being driven by the commodity stocks soaring today. Probably a mix between a bounce after being hammered recently and a weak Rand which helps the selling price of commodities. My screen says that the Rand reached R/$ 12.64, not the direction the MPC was hoping for after their interest rate rise. Another and bigger rate rise is probably on the cards for the next MPC meeting! The dollar has been really strong recently after the jobless claims number last week, which was the best in around 40 years. So more a Dollar story than a Rand story.




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939

Friday 24 July 2015

Earnings! Earnings! Read all about it



"The company employs over 300 thousand "partners", Schultz in the chairmans letter from last year refers to them as the cornerstone of the company who don the green apron daily. It is true to say that the experience at a Starbucks is one that you take with you. Whilst you need not have any previous experience in order to be a barista at Starbucks, it is recommended that you are a quick learner."




To market to market to buy a fat pig. What? Am I delusional or did someone talk about spiralling inflation here in South Africa and the need to tighten rates now. I get it, rates in the US are going up and that cash rates become more attractive meaning that emerging market assets are less lucrative, meaning we have to be proactive. Meanwhile the first country to adopt inflation targeting, the New Zealand Central Bank (Haka compulsory before the FOMC meet) has been cutting rates as the outlook is a little more cloudy. You know, the land of the long white cloud. Byron saw some of the All Blacks here at Tasha's at Melrose Arch, he was going to Woolies at lunch time and there was Kieran Read, Brodie Retallick (last 2 IRB players of the year!) and a couple of others. All dressed in shorts and t-shirts, this is obviously beach weather when compared to the winters of Wellington, Auckland and then obviously South Island. I suppose with temperatures of -1 and 7 today in Queenstown that sounds about right, cold and wet, just like you George the town.

We are getting distracted here with giant sized men from the land of the white cloud, hopefully the green and gold can pull one over them tomorrow. That would be *nice*. What is not nice is the fact that we are pre-empting the Fed's next move, Mr. Market and all the participants have had a really poor track record of trying to get that right over the last half a decade. It seems that finally the interest rate cycle has turned in the US, the best weekly jobless claims numbers yesterday since 1973 (only one person in this office was born back then) hit the screens yesterday, again underscoring the strength of the US economy. This morning sadly we have a 15 month low on Chinese PMI. I suspect that European growth will continue to surprise to the upside, business is just fine in that part of the world. Greece and their money problems are hardly going anywhere, not that it seems to stop the 22 million tourists from visiting, that is 2 tourists per citizen. More of that please, I wish we had that.

We shouldn't beat up on the central bank, they are doing what they think is in the best interest of price stability, after all that is their one and only mandate. They know the impact of higher inflation and how that erodes the income of the poor. There are of course, as a result of our relative youth as a nation (average age around here is 26-ish), more folks borrowing money than saving it. People with cash have NOT been rewarded in this last half a decade, the elusive search for yield has been a fixed income managers nightmare. Currencies being volatile have made it even harder. I suspect that SARB has the same problem.

Anyhow, tighten your belts consumers, things are about to get progressively harder in the coming cycle, let us hope that many repaired their personal balance sheets along the way. If you are interested, read the Statement by the MPC, and then have a look at the assumptions. Commodity prices, ex oil, the SARB see flat for the next two years. It is too hard, almost all of the commodities outlooks I have read set themselves up for failure. What I find quite interesting is the assumption that consumers won't react to higher electricity prices. Everyone I speak to is considering spending money on alternative energies, the quicker that we get there i.e. when it makes economic sense, the better. Obviously not for Eskom, who are expecting revenue to keep pace with their higher price projections. Talking spirals, I see revenue ones for them, they had be on strong cost cutting exercises whilst asking consumers for more.

Let us finish this part off. Local Mr. Market, the Jozi all share closed up shop half a percent higher, bouncing in early US trade in the last part of our session. Resources stocks lagging the broader market again. And that is set to continue today, commodity prices on the slide again. Over the seas and far away, stocks in New York slid through the session, lower and lower, closing at the bottom end of the range. The broader market down over half a percent, blue chips down over two thirds. Heavy machinery manufacturer Caterpillar, formerly a recommended stock, not for the last two years or so, had a gloomy outlook. Brazil and China, currency headwinds, "uncertainty" in Europe (yes, really) has meant guidance has had to be revised lower. The stock was grinding lower, registering a 52 week low. Dogs of the Dow indeed. Fear not, earnings after-hours have lifted the mood, time to look at that.




Company corner

Visa takes you more than places. Some Visas are harder to get than others. Some have reams and reams of documentation. This Visa however requires that you pay your bank back, they will facilitate the payment. I have heard the theory that the winners in the electronic payment systems will be newer systems. The fact of the matter is that the capital controls imposed on Greeks shows how reliant people are on cash. The machines in the shops worked, it was the way of life, paying for everything cash all the time that is pretty old and outdated.

In other words, perhaps it is time for the Greeks to update their reality on cash, and start carrying electronic wallets. In that way, the 20 minutes spent in front of the ATM queuing can be used for something else. If all the Greek people had signed up for M-Pesa, they would never have needed to draw cash out, you could send your friends, your baker, your tobacco shop owner, the newspaper shop owners some Euros over your mobile phones. This technology exists, use it. They do in East Africa!

Visa reported stronger than anticipated numbers post the bell, sending the stock up over 5 percent in after market trade. It was not all about results, on the conference call, Charlie Scharf the CEO implied that FIFA chief Sepp Blatter should leave now if the football (There is no soccer in FIFA) organisers wanted to keep their relationship with the company. Elections at FIFA are next year. That is a separate matter. This piece will deal with the results. Reported from Foster City, California, it is right there in terms of proximity to Silicon Valley, where I am pretty sure all sorts of payment systems are being currently thought up and engineered.

Visa Inc. Reports Fiscal Third Quarter 2015 Earnings Results <- Follow the link to get the pdf download of the numbers. A 12 percent increase in revenues to 3.5 billion Dollars, driven by a 11 percent volume growth in terms of number of transactions, around 1,3 trillion Dollars of transactions for the quarter. Sounds a little low, right? Total transactions? 18 billion. Diluted EPS of 0.74 Dollars per share on net income of 1.807 billion Dollars, which included a 110 million Dollar increase in fair value of the Visa Europe option. The company continues to buy back shares like crazy, having bought back 15.5 million shares, utilising 1.1 billion in cash, average price is 68.05 Dollars. Closing price last evening was 71.65 Dollars, well done Visa.

Remember that Visa Europe is not owned by Visa inc., rather by the banks of Europe. Visa have an option to buy it. Which is good, as far as I understand it more than 4 out of 5 transactions in Western Europe are still cash based. That needs to change. Governments want more paper trails and not fewer. Cards with the Visa emblazoned across it have increased from 2 billion in 2012 to 2.42 billion now. That is a 20 percent increase in the ability to follow each and every transaction, if you want of course.

This is a company that will continue to benefit across all parts of the globe as older technologies, cash and checks are replaced in the developed world. In the emerging world people are getting access to credit for the first time, getting access to card based technologies. Better and easier payment technologies like Apple pay will leave consumers feeling that the trust has been cemented, remembering that the person processing the payment never once sees the card, Apple encrypts the payment message. Visa will still switch the transaction. We continue to believe that there are plenty of growth opportunities for Visa, we continue to recommend the stock as a strong buy. The market agrees.




Starbucks. Coffee. Love it. Everyone started somewhere, as we pointed out, the company started with one store in Seattle, Washington State all the way across on the West Coast of the US in 1971, by the time they listed 21 years later in 1992, they had only 165 odd stores. Currently there were 22,519 stores as at the end of the last quarter, a total of 431 net store openings in the last quarter.

Howard Schultz, a Brooklyn native who grew up in a very much middle class neighbourhood, bought Starbucks for 3.8 million Dollars in 1986, having captured the brand he had worked for. I must read the biography, it is from 2011. I am a firm believer that a company of this nature needs someone who is tough as nails and never strays from that path, that desire to succeed and deliver the best product and service. In this case the same quality cup of joe day in and day out. Schultz has made more than one comeback, and has written two books about it too, one called Onward (2011) and another called Pour Your Heart Into It (1999).

The company employs over 300 thousand "partners", Schultz in the chairmans letter from last year refers to them as the cornerstone of the company who don the green apron daily. It is true to say that the experience at a Starbucks is one that you take with you. Whilst you need not have any previous experience in order to be a barista at Starbucks, it is recommended that you are a quick learner.

I found this old BusinessInsider piece: Why Working At Starbucks For Three Weeks Was The Toughest Job I've Ever Had. The difference between ordering a burger at McDonalds or Burger King and a coffee at Starbucks is possibly in the careers segment explanation: "Their work goes beyond handcrafting a perfectly made beverage; it's about creating a human connection with every customer." Coffee is more personal than food, seemingly.

Enough of that. I for one am excited that Taste are bringing the company to our shores. Here are the results in brief, as per the company release: Starbucks Delivers Record Quarterly Revenue of $4.9 Billion and Record Q3 EPS. I guess the headline tells it all. Whilst the stock is expensive, it trades on a 33 multiple, the market seems to be OK with the revenue growth rates and more importantly outlook.

This was hands down, as per Schultz's comments "Starbucks Q3 fiscal 2015 stands as among the strongest and most remarkable quarters in our over 23 years as a public company .. .. having served an additional 23 million customer occasions in Q3 of this year over last year, clearly evidencing a continuation of the strong momentum we have seen across our business and around the world this fiscal year."

We continue to expect double digit revenue growth, earnings could top 2 Dollars next year. At 59 Dollars (more or less where the stock is going to open), this means that the market is always expecting big things from this company. 30 times forward. We continue to own this stock, and whilst the upside is not as much as before inside of the next 12 odd months, we continue to accumulate this company on weakness.




Last night after the market closed Amazon released their second quarter results. The stock in after hours trade is up 17% which gives Amazon a bigger market cap than Walmart! Walmart has revenues of $486 billion compared to Amazon with revenues of $89 billion. South Africa has a GDP of around $350 billion. This article gives a good comparison of the two companies - Amazon is now bigger than Walmart.

Why the big move up? It is because Amazon made a profit this quarter of $92 million or 19 cents a share, where analysts were expecting a loss of 14 cents a share. Amazons profit number has never been the core focus of results due to them ploughing all the money that they make back into the business with the result that some quarters they make a small profit or a small loss. Given the speed that the internet is changing the world, it is very necessary that they reinvest all the profits to put space between them and their competitors. They are spending money on building their distribution network which allows them to deliver parcels quicker and cheaper than their competitors which at the end of the day is all the consumer wants. In some parts of the US you can get your delivery in a couple of hours, in 9 cities you can get your delivery within an hour! The only company that I can see having a big enough balance sheet to be able to properly compete with Amazon is Walmart. Last year Walmart only had online sales of $12.2 billion so they have big catchup to do to be in the same league as Amazon.

Onto the numbers: Revenue is up 20% to $23.19 billion (up 27% without the negative currency impact); North American sales up 25% to $13.8 billion. Third quarter guidance is for growth of between 13% and 24% to revenue of between $23.3 and $25.5 billion. The service that most people forget Amazon has is their Amazon Web Services (AWS) business which provides cloud storage and server farms. This business is one of their main profit drivers and provides the funding for the rest of the business. AWS had revenue growth of 81.5% to $1.82 billion and they managed to grow margins in the division. Don't forget that Amazon also has a streaming, on demand TV service (similar to Netflix). Their flagship show is called Transparent and received 11 Emmy nominations.

Jeff Bezos's goal for Amazon is to turn it into the "everything store", a one stop shop for consumers. Given that they started out only selling books 20 years ago, he is well on his way to doing that. The market sees this company as the future with its market cap being bigger than the 'old' brick and mortar business of Walmart. We still like this stock, and if you are prepared for a bumpy ride, then buy.




Don't forget that we have a New York investment option where you can own the likes of Visa, Starbucks, Amazon, Apple, Nike, Facebook, GE and, and, and. These shares trade on the NYSE and you are able to own them in US dollars. The SARB and SARS allow you to invest R 1 million a year offshore without clearance and then a further R 10 million a year with clearance. If you want more info, email us or give us a call (details at the bottom).




Linkfest, lap it up

How accurate is it saying that the market will probably return 5 - 10%? Turns out that it is not very accurate, the market is a lot more volatile than the 'average' - The average return doesn't exist!

Who says that we need to grow up? Here is a tree house for adults - Japan's Largest Treehouse is a Sprawling Structure Built Around a 300-year Old Tree



Some are saying that it is a good time to buy gold because it is at a 5 year low. Here is another view - Gold vs Interest Rates. Gold doesn't pay dividends and doesn't innovate and grow, so not a fan of it as an 'investment'. Remember what goes down, can go down lower!




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Anglo American have also released their interim numbers this morning. They will of course maintain the dividend, that is possibly the best news out of a report that sees production cuts (necessary), unfortunately that comes along with a whole lot of job cuts too. Lonmin are set to be laying off over 4000 workers. Gold and Platinum stocks are plumbing new multi year lows, the copper price is down at levels last seen in 2009. Phew. As a result of the commodities complex falling short and some PMI numbers from Europe falling short of expectations (and China, added to that), the market is selling off across the board. With regards to Anglo, I suspect that the D:Ream song from 1993 applies "Things Can Only Get Better"!




Sent to you by the Vestacters, Sasha, Michael, Byron and Paul.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Byron and Michael on Twitter

087 985 0939