Wednesday 28 September 2016

Health is Wealth


"Innovation remains a large part of the company. Any runner will tell you that their running shoes over a few decades (they would have to be in their late forties, early fifties) have changed drastically over time. In the old days you had to "run your shoes in". In the Pegasus range, Nike have sold over 50 million pairs since the shoe was introduced."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks slipped here in Jozi after a decent enough start, we were higher to begin with and then that all fell away during the course of the day. In the end we closed at exactly 50900 points on the Jozi all share, down 1.13 percent on the day. Resources were the hardest hit, down nearly two percent on the day, most stocks amongst the majors ended in the red. In fact, most stocks ended in the red, Capitec with results managed to buck the trend, they are adding around 100 thousand customers a month, in the last half. How is that possible, three thousand customers a day? And judging by the size of their loan book, relative to the "big four", they may be scratching the surface. The market rates them at double (and more) the rating of some of the older banks in South Africa. Thus far the company has never delivered short which resulted in an earnings stumble. They continue to prove their naysayers wrong, they continue to attract customers, they continue to innovate and give customers products that they need and want. Credit cards and home loans will be a big push, I am pretty sure that they will get that right.

In the losing column near the top was MTN again, allegations from the Nigerian Senate Floor that the company has illegally repatriated 13.92 billion Dollars over a ten year period. What? As far as I understood it, the Nigerian Central Bank facilitates all of the ins and outs, right? They would know all the flows. The company this morning has suggested that the comments are completely unfounded and without any merit. Yech. More noise that detracts from the core business trying to empower ordinary citizens to get access to the internet. The more investment in the networks, the better and cheaper the internet will get for their users. Data in the developed world, where I am sorry to say this next part, is more business friendly, is more like a utility. And cheaper. So you use more of it across your devices and empower yourself. The better for ordinary citizens. The more you stifle business, the less they will invest. Yech, we watch it.

The other big news on the local front is that Steinhoff have announced that they are issuing shares to a number of parties in order to raise a whole lot of money, in order to shore up cash reserves. The logistics are easy enough to understand, just lean in a little closer to understand the different legs. Firstly, Upington Investment Holdings (a business controlled by the trust of Christo Wiese, who is the biggest shareholder of Steinhoff) will subscribe for 162 million new shares at 5.055 Euros per share (higher than where the stock price traded yesterday). Total proceeds of that, 819 million Euros. Next up, an empowerment deal for 60 million shares with a vehicle called Lancaster 101, facilitated by The Public Investment Corporation (the PIC). That will raise 303 million Euros, same price of 5.055 Euros per share, I am sure there will be more detail in due course.

Next, an "upsize facility" (you thought that was only available at McDonald's, right?) of 110 million shares offered to institutional shareholders via an accelerated bookbuild, price determined via the process. More details on that during the next day or so, I guess. In addition to the 162 million shares that Upington is paying for, the same vehicle is buying another 152 million shares currently classified by the company as Treasury shares (the ones that the company holds). In total, should the full placement of the "upsize facility" take place, the company may raise up to 2.447 billion Euros. Wow. That represents, as part of the closing value last evening, 12.5 percent of the market capitalisation. This is pretty big for the company, and again a sign that Christo Wiese continues to back this team in a significant way. The stock is up over two and a half percent at the get go, the stock has certainly been under the pump lately too!

Over the seas and far away, in New York, New York, stocks rose across the board. The Dow Jones industrial average added nearly three-quarters of a percent, the broader market S&P 500 added nearly two-thirds of a percent. The nerds of NASDAQ performed better than both, 0.92 percent better on the day. Energy was the only real loser on the day, oil prices down as there was no deal reached in Algiers. Yeah, well done chaps, the higher the price goes (the oil price) the more the commercial frackers will produce. Dominance is gone. And, if Clinton has her way, solar energy and alternatives will be a bigger part of the US landscape. The markets seem to suggest that Clinton won the debate, the biggest recipient of flows was the Mexican Peso, which rallied sharply after some recent weakness.




Company corner

Nike no friends. After regular market hours, that is. The biggest sports apparel and sports shoes manufacturer in the western world, and one of the most recognisable brands across the globe, reported numbers last evening for the first quarter of their financial year 2017. At face value they actually look quite good, revenues up 8 percent to 9.1 billion, in constant currencies sales were up 10 percent. Diluted earnings per share clocked 73 cents, up 9 percent when compared to the prior financial year. Here is the reason for Mr. Market being disappointed however, future orders worldwide were only up 5 percent, 7 percent in constant currencies. Here is the thing, Nike touts themselves as a growth company, and whilst I firmly believe that to be true, the company needs to deliver growth in the low to mid teens if they are going to continue to attract a premium multiple to the market.

There is no mistaking that they are a premium brand in athletic wear. There is no doubting that there is a huge push from broader society to get healthier and to get more active. I ran my first half marathon in 1997 I think, I ran my first ultra marathon in 2000. In those days there were a few hundred people in the field. There were very few races in South Africa that you had to enter a month or so before. Comrades, that you could submit your entry around 8 weeks before, there were no caps. Only in 2000 I think there was a cap, then the numbers subsided again. Nowadays, if you don't enter months and months ahead, you are not going to get in. I mean, Two Oceans entires are open already. Nuts!!! They are around halfway through the cap of 11 thousand entrants. I feel tempted .....

Enough about my amateur hap-hazard training regime and running aspirations, Paul is the real revelation around here. He is on a running streak of at least one mile a day for the last two and one quarter years. By my math, that is more than 800 days of running at least one mile a day. At Vestact these exercise regimes are serious business. And I am very sure that we are definitely not alone in this regard, companies are ditching the old ways for encouraging their employees into getting active. As such, all the apparel and shoe businesses globally will benefit from higher sales of athletic wear. This is a global theme. Equally, casual wear has morphed into athletic apparel, the so called "athleisure" category. It is not uncommon to see folks walking around in what looks like athletic clothes, comfortable is the new cool.

CEO Mark Parker had this to say about the general category on the conference call - "The active-wear market continues to outpace the overall apparel and footwear market, which itself continues to outpace global GDP growth." He is equally right here too, in the opening statements of the results release he makes some more good points about the whole sector. It is not just about making the shirts, the pants, the socks, the shoes and so on, the technology associated with the manufacturing process and the experience that the end users get when using the products are just as important nowadays:

    "Q1 also showed how we're amplifying every category through sports style innovation, transforming retail by connecting the digital and physical experience and ushering in a new Era of Personalized Performance - through product, consumer connections and our supply chain. NIKE's strategic investments in these growth opportunities continue to deliver long-term value to our shareholders."


Indeed, they just announced a fairly *nice* partnership with Apple Watch, the Nike only version for runners. What is quite important to note is that the company is not everything to all sports, they saw the decline in golf across North America (participation) and decided enough was enough there. The word golf appears once there.

Other sports and athletes sponsored by Nike had a great time during the last financial quarter to August 31, a first ever all Nike affair in the Euro championship (France vs Portugal), Serena tying the Steffi Graf record of 22 grand slam singles at Wimbledon, 1500 Olympians from 60 countries were sponsored by Nike, winning 189 medals. And of course Neymar kicked the penalty that won Brazil to their first football Olympic gold medal. Mo Farah rocked it, defending both his Olympic titles. Of the 24 members of the Team USA basketball teams at the Olympics (both men and woman USA teams won), 21 wore Nike or Jordan shoes. Make no mistake, Nike (and their peers) make wonderful apparel and shoes.

Innovation remains a large part of the company. Any runner will tell you that their running shoes over a few decades (they would have to be in their late forties, early fifties) have changed drastically over time. In the old days you had to "run your shoes in". In the Pegasus range, Nike have sold over 50 million pairs since the shoe was introduced. That is pretty astonishing, considering that a Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 33 (full name) costs 1799.95 Rand on the online website. Look, running shoes will always be expensive. A single shoe weighs 306 grams, according to the website. For comparisons sake, Nike of course owns Converse (since 2003), and according to Wikipedia, Chuck Taylor All-Stars have sold over 600 million pairs. Surely that must be the best selling shoe of all time? And not the Bata Toughie people ....

So, innovation and pushing the boundaries, more personalisation (you can make your own shoes on the website) will lead to wider margins in time. We continue to see the company as a market leader. That is all very well, that is the company. We can see that it is in good hands, in a good space and has good growth prospects. The stock price on the other hand is at the same level pre-market that it was last June. That is 15 months on and we are basically at the same level. The new buyback program of 12 billion Dollars from last year November has proceeded slowly, the company has bought back only 2.2 billion of the 12 billion Dollar program. Approaching the lows of the last 52 weeks (pre-market indicated 53.89 Dollars versus 12 month low of 51.47 Dollars) means the company may get busy. The market cap is currently around 91 billion Dollars, buying back and retiring around 11-12 percent of the shares in issue has big long term implications.

The market is pricing the stock on 20 times forward earnings for the next financial year. Whilst that is not dirt cheap and equally you are not being handsomely rewarded by way of yield (1.16 percent at current levels), you are still buying a growth business. One should continue to accumulate what is a really quality business at a lower price, you will be well rewarded in the years to come, as will all their competitors no doubt. We maintain our conviction buy recommendation.




Linkfest, lap it up

New technology is helping us discover more about our past. Having the ability to read old scrolls that previously we couldn't because they were too fragile to handle is a huge step forward - Archeologists are virtually unraveling ancient hidden texts that could rewrite biblical history.

Having access to financial products will help the poor. Being able to access credit at a reasonable rate to fund a business with lumpy cash flows is one example. Another is simply just getting interest on money saved, keeping money under the mattress has risks involved and zero interest - Developing nations would be $3.7 trillion richer if more people could handle their finances from their mobile phones. The amount of time that I have saved by using the banking app on my phone is significant.

I know that we produce just short of 100 million barrels of oil a day, I have never thought about what can be produced from it- What Can Be Made from One Barrel of Oil?.






Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks are higher to begin with across the Mzansi landscape, some more than others. Marginally better across Europe in a follow through of the US session. Yeah, we need this, it has been more than a little jittery lately.

Here is a little insight from a friend of the newsletter, into Mexico City, just so you can feel a little better about where you live, or better that it is same-same in other places:

"Greetings from the former Aztec capital. All is well here in that f'ed up, developing-nation way that I suspect a conscientious South African would understand. Violent episodes fill the "penny horrible" newspapers; the Peso is falling; the President is accused of idiocy; they bought Chinese gasoline and that's why the pollution is so bad lately.. etc, etc, etc. In the meantime, friends celebrate birthdays and anniversaries; the mariachi bands keep playing and the mangoes are uniformly excellent. This is a great and ancient city, and don't underestimate the solace that good produce can provide."





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Tuesday 27 September 2016

Happily Ever Twitter


"Another big story still doing the rounds is Twitter, we suggested that there may be someone else, and it emerges that Disney is rumoured to be looking at the 140 character news stream. More than a cursory glance. Trolls and princesses? The trolls of course are from Twitter, Disney has more happily ever afters than the All Blacks."




To market to market to buy a fat pig It was tough to figure out why the markets actually fell yesterday. Was it the pending OPEC non scheduled meeting, which could, or could not reveal some production cuts? Was it central bank fatigue post the afterglow from last week? Was it the fact that earnings in the US are looming and not too much is expected? Earnings are expected to turn positive in the fourth quarter, after six successive quarters of earnings being trimmed.

Was it worries over European banks? Most especially Deutsche Bank? German Chancellor Angela Merkel is in a tough spot on this one, she has told other banks in Southern Europe that the state should impose losses on the bond holders, if governments step in to capitalise it at any stage. The bank suggested, even in the face of a US department of Justice settlement that could be in the region of 14 billion Dollars, that the bank was well capitalised, questions over their capital adequacy ratios were pure speculation. That was according to a bank spokesperson.

The Deutsche Bank stock price was the lowest ever. Like ever. The example I made was that our newest colleague (nearly a year in December) is Bright, he turned 24 this year, the bank has been listed that long. When Bright was only interested in pooping and food and not sleeping too much, his parents would have seen the Deutsche Bank share price the same as it is today. Amazing.

And if that wasn't enough for banks, Wells Fargo, supposedly the most squeaky clean of them all has seen employees file a class action suit against the Wagon and Horse bank. The fellow sitting shotgun (the real shotgun) must be wondering if together they really do go far. The Wells payoff line "Together we'll go far". Too far with ghost accounts, too far with aggressive sales techniques. Just too much, the stock price has been hammered accordingly, the stock trades on a historic 11x multiple with a 3.39 percent yield as of last evening.

Banks. What a wonderful business when it works well. The public have blamed the whole financial crisis on bankers Not the lawmakers who were supposedly supposed to be in charge of the parameters, not the regulators who were supposed to be overseers, and definitely not themselves for excessive greed. It is always someone else. It is a far easier target, the excesses in the system were far bigger and more visible in bankers bonuses. And whilst all sorts of programs kept the financial system afloat and capitalised, and more importantly instilled confidence overall, the excesses of the past have to a large extent disappeared. Or so it seems. I wonder what Warren Buffett and Berkshire think of all of this, they are after all the biggest shareholders. It ain't going to be pretty.

After all was said and done, stocks had sunk to session lows, both the Dow and the nerds of NASDAQ lost 0.91 percent, the broader market S&P sank 0.86 percent. Another big story still doing the rounds is Twitter, we suggested that there may be someone else, and it emerges that Disney is rumoured to be looking at the 140 character news stream. More than a cursory glance. Trolls and princesses? The trolls of course are from Twitter, Disney has more happily ever afters than the All Blacks. Unlikely really methinks. Salesforce for realsies? The chattering classes seem to think that either Twitter is a good fit for Salesforce, or it is a dumb idea. It is likely to be a highly dilutive transaction as Twitter still grapples with making any real money, the channels may be perfect in the future. Remember that Disney owns the biggest stake in ESPN, if users are likely to watch via Twitter (second screen), then it makes sense. Until then, I actually don't know.

As for the high brow presidential debate, there is little to say about that. Politico has a good piece, of course for right wingers the media is always unfair: 5 takeaways from the first presidential debate. The same is true for the left wing, who accuse the media of being too friendly with business. The media cannot win, their job is to get you and I the best angle on what they see. The property buffoon owner suggested that she hasn't had a very good track record. She really seems a whole lot more equipped for the job. If you are tired of this already, and there are two more debates, then I am afraid you will have to watch this gem: Hillary Clinton sits down with Zach Galifianakis for her most memorable interview yet. It may well be Zach Galifianakis' best work.

Back to local, where things were not so lekker for equity markets after a successful heritage day weekend. Stocks in Jozi, Jozi sank a percent by the time the closing bell rang. It was scratchy across the market and looked like a deep red-spread. The Rand continues to firm up in general Euro, Pound and Dollar weakness, against some of the other currencies across the globe. That of course helps the Rand hedges diddly squat. There were a few stocks in the green, RMI Holdings, AB InBev and Richemont. Deep in the red were those with a European and Breeteeesh flavour, Aspen, Brait, Mediclinic losses were joined by AngloGold Ashanti, Capitec and Anglo American itself.




Company corner

Mediclinic has released a five month trading update this morning. The first half of the year ends on the 30th of September, that is Friday, right? The results themselves are expected to be released on the 10th of November. Is this a case of simply taking the five month revenues and presuming that the last month will be similar? It is a bit weird to have a five month trading update, I know that it is something that Richemont does too.

Anyhows, Mediclinic point out that in their first market, South Africa, they are happy with where they are, in spite of increased competition and a weak macro environment. I suppose there are certain procedures that you can and will put off if the home fires on the finances front are not burning that strong. Margins are expected to shrink a little as a result of higher pharma prices and improvement in clinical personal (meaning more people) and paying their staff better. The last thing you want as a patient is having a grumpy nurse or admin person when you are there for something that may seem routine to them, it isn't to you.

Let us take the sales numbers and translate them back to Great British Pounds, for ease of use and looking at one currency. ZA sales are 6.054 billion Rand, or 343.88 million Pounds. Switzerland sales are 677 million Swiss Francs, or 536.87 million Pounds. Middle East sales were 1.315 billion UAE Dirhams, or 275.56 million Pounds. Total sales are then 1.15731 billion Great British Pounds for the first five months of the year, if you try and figure out the half year, you are likely to get to a number of 1.388 billion Pounds (1.8 billion Dollars). Or global sales of around 24.425 billion Rand for a half, nearly 50 billion Rand annualised.

Remember that Mediclinic also owns around 29.9 percent of Spire Healthcare, that company delivered annual revenues of 884.8 million Pounds. If you take a half year, and then multiple it by 29.9 percent, and then presume that there is an around 4 odd percent rise, you get to around 114.5 million pounds. That is for the five month period, comparable to these numbers of course. The split on a revenue basis is 42.21 percent Switzerland, 27.04 percent South Africa, 21.74 percent the UAE and 9.01 percent the UK. It looks like a business that will trend to higher sales in the UK, I am sure that they would want that in time.

The outlook, and I am sure that will be again fleshed out at the results in the first half of November, suggests stability in Switzerland with modest growth, doing OK here in Southern Africa, and in the UAE expectations are low to mid digit sales growth with EBITDA margins to be around the mid to high teens (15-18 I guess). The second half, as a result of the integration in the UAE and opening of new facilities, is expected to yield more favourable results. Thats is it, more in November, it all looks inline and reasonable to me.

The Mediclinic share price has been under the pump lately. In part the pound has been pounded. Which should mean higher revenues from their overseas business, in particular in Switzerland where the EBIDTA margins are better. Perhaps Mediclinic are also looking to take a bigger stake in Spire, they would have to raise more money in the UK, which would make the company a riskier proposition. The UK price is down 10.53 percent. In Rands it is worse, the stronger Rand has exacerbated the losses in the share price. We maintain our buy, in what is a quality business with great growth aspirations. The weak share price definitely is a big opportunity.




Linkfest, lap it up

Along with the likes of the art market collectable car prices have sky rocketed recently. The trend seems to be slowing though - The Collectible Car Market Is Getting the Air Kicked Out of its Tires. From a South African perspective, these prices are set in Dollars, Euro's and Pounds. So the recent Rand strength has meant that in Rand terms collectable cars are worth less.

AI is here, the next step is to integrate it more into human life. Creativity is still firmly a human trait, AI is rather good at analysing creativity and creating a good replica of what appears to be creativity - The first pop song ever written by artificial intelligence is pretty good, actually

I don't see this book becoming a best seller. It seems that the only people to buy it are those who want to own the world's biggest book - The Season's Biggest Novel Has 1.3 Million Words and Outweighs a Bowling Ball. The book is not released in electronic format so reading this in bed or on the beach is out.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks are likely to be higher here today, US futures are up and markets across Europe are also in the green. I cannot wait for earnings season, that is more exciting than any central bank meeting of any sort. Or speech from whomever. Or presidential debate.





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Monday 26 September 2016

Nothing is free


"OK, that is all fine and well, the founder of our nation, Nelson Mandela said: "Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." And that always holds true. Knowledge really is powerful. It enables more people to uplift themselves out of abject poverty than any government program."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks rose in Jozi in the second half of the session, we closed one-fifth of a percent better on the day. And it was a whole point below 52 thousand, a level first seen at the beginning of February 2015. That is right, if you have been invested in "the market", i.e. an index tracker since that point, you are essentially flat on your investments. The market highs are at April 2015. Since then we have seen a shunning of emerging markets, worries about downgrades in South Africa to junk, real downgrades a notch below a junk rating and political machinations that look like they resemble a Gary Larson cartoon. Bizarre to say the least. As we often say, at least democracy still works around these parts, we are a country that is about as diverse as you can get, and that should be celebrated and embraced.

All sectors did pretty well, inside of the top 40 there was an equal split of winners to losers, Anglo American at the top, South32 at the bottom. Go figure. The Rand is marginally firmer this morning to the Dollar, rates debate. Sigh. Over the seas and far away, in New York, New York, stocks sank all the way into the close of the session. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost just over seven-tenths of a percent, the broader market S&P 500 ended the session down 0.57 percent and the nerds of NASDAQ slipped by nearly two-thirds of a percent by the time all was said and done. The main talking point of the day was undoubtably Twitter. The stock surged over twenty percent as the news started to filter through that Salesforce was taking more than a cursory glance at the 140 character customisable news tool. And in the pre market Twitter was trading down, after some fellow had downgraded the stock on some concerns around continued growth and platform monetisation. Ai shem, not everybody has luck with timing!

The suggestion however is that it is not just Salesforce that is lining up. Whilst Twitter may be indispensable for many people who like news and can customise it to a tee, the service lacks global appeal. It is less about friends and more about connections. It is less about caring what other people think, Twitter has also suffered as a result of too many haters. I really don't know what to think. I suspect that Twitter should continue to try and give it a go alone, in the end it is all about whether or not the shareholders of both what is being bought and being sold have the ultimate and final say on these matters, if the deal parameters are free of course. Short interest in Twitter, as per the data available at WSJ is 8.7 percent. It would take more than three days to cover all that interest.

There are several articles doing the rounds, Bloomberg Intelligence valued Twitter (on the same metrics used for the Microsoft purchase of LinkedIn) at around 16.7 billion Dollars. The current market capitalisation is more than that. So? The company may now attract more suitors, depending on whether someone wants the platform or not. I suspect that this may percolate for a week or two until something firm takes place, or there will be something firm before the markets opens today. It must happen that way if a deal is to take place. And whether shareholders like that or not, there is absolutely nothing that any of us can do about it, we don't hold enough shares in any company to sway any board. I wonder what the users think? Ironically less than LinkedIn it seems.




I hear the students loud and clear. They want free eduction. Free for them. I hear their circumstances, we all live with the painful history, for many more people it is actually lived day in and day out. Struggles for many are more real than us who get to sit in nice air conditioned offices and don't have to worry about bread and butter issues. My eldest daughter is a keen watcher of the Ellen show (yes really) and yesterday I caught a bit with Michelle Obama, who co-hosted the show. The first lady of the United States was from the South Side of Chicago, a rougher than usual neighbourhood and credited her parents with stressing that education is the great leveller. Nobody can take away your brain. Nobody can "steal" your knowledge. Once you have it, you will know that you need to continue to expand and broaden. The more you know, the less you know that you know. When I was twenty I knew everything. Later I realised that I knew very little at that age.

OK, that is all fine and well, the founder of our nation, Nelson Mandela said: "Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." And that always holds true. Knowledge really is powerful. It enables more people to uplift themselves out of abject poverty than any government program. It enables. In South Africa, we have first generation graduates that when they get their first paying job, they are then the provider of resources to parents and grandparents. In that sense, we are a bit unique in the global context, the third generation is expected to improve the living standards of the previous two. That is very, very real for many, many South Africans, most of whom were dispossessed of land, of quality education and had terrible basic services and never had a decent chance to climb any corporate ladders, as they found themselves as second class citizens in their own land. These are all realities that we must confront a generation into our democracy.

As the late economist Milton Friedman (an economic Nobel Laureate) told us time and time again, nothing in life is for free. In fact, he took the older acronym TANSTAAFL (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch) and popularised it. The whole idea that a free market should separate us all from one another and yet make us work together. Friedman is definitely not the cup of tea of the left, much of what he said isn't popular with that segment of society. I am a fan of quotes, I am less a fan of publishing them all the time in an opinion piece (this is always an opinion piece), these two resonate well with me:

    "The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both"


And then another one, that perhaps the mayor of Jozi knows so well:

    "The great virtue of a free market system is that it does not care what colour people are; it does not care what their religion is; it only cares whether they can produce something you want to buy. It is the most effective system we have discovered to enable people who hate one another to deal with one another and help one another."


S'true. So both suggest that people should have the freedom to choose whatever they want to. And invariably the reason why socialist countries unravel in time is as a direct result of suppressing the individual. You can never hold the individual down. You can try. You may win for 60-70 years, as a government, eventually you get eaten by those you ate. Still, that doesn't suggest how we solve the current impasse. We all want our students to leave their institutions with more than life skills, to be 100 percent ready and hit the ground running. I sometimes think that globally there needs to be a proper overhaul of our higher learning institutions. The learning in work never ends. You have to evolve and know more each and every day.

The way that we still sit at desks and learn in the same fashion as we did 180 years ago, when we are 20 years into the internet era still amazes me. I know that there are many online universities, I know that there are many online places of learning, I know that many platforms afford you with the ability to study from anywhere. Surely it is time to advance the likes of UNISA in a more aggressive manner. For employers to get a little more creative and afford people studying online the relevant work experience at the same time. Getting paid and learning, more of those programs. Get students involved in generating revenues for themselves during their studies. Having a job on the weekend, or a couple of week afternoons, depending on their schedule.

Lastly, nothing is for free. There is an argument to be made that something free cheapens the end product. Why didn't everyone adopt free and open source technologies (Linux) early on? Somehow, if something is for "free" there must be something "wrong" with it, we bought Microsoft and Macs instead. The biggest problem is that if you tell the folks who deliver the eduction that they are going to have to ply their trade (education) for less, for the advancement of society, you may well find yourself in a position of losing quality. It may be a noble idea, these are individuals you are dealing with. Eventually their futures will mean less quality. And the inability to fund institutions properly leads to leakage. And then the end product is badly diluted over time. Worse still, the students only have a timeline of a few years to half a decade.

The lecturers and educators and administrators and all the staff that keeps the institutions ticking will be there long after the students have left. They will have to deal with the realities of smaller budgets and limited resources and that will impact on the lives of the next generation. Which leads me to believe that there HAS to be some middle road on funding. I agree that we need a better outcome. This is roughly the spending breakdown (i.e. the cost) of all education in South Africa, from a couple of years ago:



We already spend a LOT on education in this country, a huge amount relative to the rest of the budget. For instance, if we drove MUCH better and obeyed all the rules (and enforced them properly) then much of the Road Accident Funding could be redirected in the direction of student funding. That is to change behaviour and to make sure that policing is not only visible, also it MUST be effective. I have the very best idea. Cut the Road Accident Funding in half as a result of better policing and enforcement, and hey presto, you have the money. That is a collective effort. See below what I mean, a transfer from the RAF to the National Student Financial Aid Scheme would make a world of difference to all and sundry. Look, it may have a negative impact on ambulance chasers, I am sure all of us can live with that:






Linkfest, lap it up

Reading this article all I could think was, unintended consequences and the resources (time & money) needed to implement this tax could be better used elsewhere - Vancouver mayor promises new vacant home tax by 2017.

September 8 years ago is when the bottom dropped out of financial markets - The 27 scariest moments of the financial crisis. When thinking back to 2008 it does not feel like 8 years have passed.

I wonder if this is a global trend or just an American trend? - Americans are ditching giant restaurant chains. I'm sure that the hipster, anti-mainstream trend is part of the reason. Maybe it is just that large chains have slacked off on creating a "new" and "original" dinning experience, being small means that you can shift your styles quickly.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Temba Bavuma you beauty, and Quinny de Kock you biscuit. Both are Joburg's finest of course, at rival schools not even across town from one another, within close proximity as far as our great city is concerned. We have good weather here, if only the rain could start falling, I would appreciate that a lot. There is some in store for later in the week. Apparently.





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Friday 23 September 2016

Competition for Data must Rise!


"More people use more data as their phone advances in technology. Watching YouTube (which didn't exist back then) clips on the Nokia 3210, no ways! WhatsApp, what is that? You were sending 2 Rand a pop sms' and if memory serves, you were confined to a certain number of characters. Otherwise it rolled over to another sms which then became a second charge."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Another day focussed on central banks, this time the aftermath of the Fed decision and the fact that global equity markets cheered the decision. The Rand rallied hard as the Dollar lost some allure, the general consensus around the marketplace, whether ill informed or not, was that there were some company flows inwards to pay for the SABMiller stake. In other words, when AB InBev take SABMiller out, the cash has to be here already. I suppose the timing is what it is.

The Monetary Policy Committee also released their forecasts for growth and inflation, growth is expected to be muted in the short term and inflation is expected to stay inside of the 3-6 percent band, admittedly at the top end of that range. If you are interested, then follow the link - Selected forecast results: MPC meeting September 2016. Inflation through next year is set to average 5.8 percent, and the year after that inflation is set to be lower to 5.5 percent.

Those of course are predictions. Remember that at the beginning of this year, Deputy Fed governor Stanley Fischer suggested that the Fed would be on course for four hikes this year. We are yet to see one. Even the best predictions by the best predictors are still predictions. The Statement of the Monetary Policy Committee points out that food prices are somewhat of a problem for consumers, no thanks to the drought. Any rain on the horizon? Hopefully. Expect food prices to peak in the last quarter, according to them.

The statement delivered by Reserve Bank governor Lesetja Kganyago suggested that "(t)he marked appreciation of the rand during the past few days appears to be driven by expectations of unchanged US monetary policy, as well as to speculation regarding possible purchases of rand related to a major M&A transaction. See? They think that too. The upshot of it all is that rates are on hold, and the MPC is concerned about inflation. What is interesting is this line, it seems to be a classic on the one hand: "The MPC is of the view that should current forecasts transpire, we may be close to the end of the tightening cycle. The committee is aware that a number of the favourable factors that have contributed to the improved outlook can change very quickly resulting in a reassessment of this view. The bar for monetary accommodation, by contrast, remains high, as the MPC would need to see a more significant and sustained decline of the inflation trajectory to within the inflation target range"

So we could be at the end of the current rates cycle, we may however not be, one could never say for sure though? The Rand weakened through the session, perhaps the M&A related Rand buying had passed and the prospects of ZA yields staying at these levels saw some retreat. It was good for stocks as a collective, with the Jozi all share index rallying nearly two and one-quarter of a percent. Resources were up an incredible three and a half percent on the day, financials added about as much as Mr. Market, and industrials were not too far off being up 2 percent. Glencore, BHP and AngloGold Ashanti dominated the winners column, there was a single stock lower in the top 40, and it was Aspen, down one quarter of a percent.

Over the seas and far away, in New York, New York, stocks finished better again, the afterglow of the Fed statement Wednesday. The broader market S&P 500 closed two-thirds (nearly) of a percent higher, whilst the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.54 percent. The headlines belonged to the nerds of NASDAQ, the index closed at a record high and set another intraday high too. Pencil in 5339.52 as your new all time high. Why I am not a fan of graphs and selective data picking is because of the following "drawing of lines in the sand". Since the financial crisis ended and the market bottomed in March 2009, the NASDAQ is up 312 percent. Sell it! Since the tech bubble burst, track the top of markets back to the middle of March in the year 2000, the NASDAQ is up less than 6 percent. Buy it all! And since the index bottomed in October 2002, in the great tech washout, the nerds of NASDAQ is up nearly 350 percent as a collective.

Be careful where you select your starting point. Even at that point, October 2002 to present day, "things" and constituents of the NASDAQ are VERY different. No Google/Alphabet, it wasn't listed, Apple was a mere twinkle in the eye. Although listed, it was a fraction of the price it is now. And Facebook didn't exist yet. Amazon is up 4630 percent since then (October 2002), the stock was only trading at around 17 Dollars back then, the market cap is now 386 billion Dollars. Microsoft is up, since October 2002, a more "reasonable" 155 percent.

So forgive me for once again pointing out that no two times in history are remotely the same. If people tell you about the Tech Bubble meltdown and compare it today, just remind them that Facebook didn't exist and by extension had zero users (there are 1.71 billion monthly active users now), the iPhone didn't exist (since then Apple have sold over one billion units), Amazon had sales of less than 4 billion Dollars back then, consensus for this year is for revenues of around 136 billion Dollars. See? This time is the same-same, yet completely different.




This whole idea that "stuff" must get cheaper, yet you want to be paid more makes me scratch my head. Data for one is expensive in South Africa as a direct result of government, their reluctance to encourage competition has meant that the only providers can keep rates at the goldilocks rate, or just above it. No network provider is out there to screw you over, they have to recoup the costs of the development of a very expensive above ground network. Make no mistake, their margins are pretty spectacular, the service is pretty darn good on balance, you would say.

Vodacom and MTN have spent tens of billions of Rands so that your swankiest and newest smartphone can consume all the data that you want and need. High speed internet is a thing for only rich people in this country. The internet as we know it is less than a generation old. I for one am glad that the internet has changed so many lives and will change so many more. Check out this graph from Internet Live Stats:



Additions to internet users around the world is slowing, growing at a slower pace, only around 7.5 percent as the base has now swelled to 3.4 billion folks. Sadly this still only represents 46 percent of the global population. Think about that for a second. Less than half of the world get to use the awesomeness of the internet. Something we take completely for granted. Ten years ago it was only 17.6 percent. In 2000 it was only 6.8 percent. Hey, I was using the internet before that, I think my first experience with the "web" was in 1996, around 20 years back. It was hardly earth shattering, Netscape and the like, Ask Jeeves, and remember that search engine Aardvark? Ha-ha. How times have changed.

Remember your first mobile phone? I was "late" to getting one, I had an email address (hotmail) long before a cell phone. If someone wanted me, they could reach me at work or home. Otherwise, there was nothing else needed, right? No, I had to get one, a Nokia 3210, brand spanking new in 1999. It had predictive text, I think? The 3210 sold a massive 150 million units. And the reason why it had a good battery life is that you only made two calls a day, sent perhaps three sms' here and there. And that was possibly 20-30 Rand worth of usage. Nowadays, calls are limited. WhatsApp, even making data calls are a very common occurrence.

More people use more data as their phone advances in technology. Watching YouTube (which didn't exist back then) clips on the Nokia 3210, no ways! WhatsApp, what is that? You were sending 2 Rand a pop sms' and if memory serves, you were confined to a certain number of characters. Otherwise it rolled over to another sms which then became a second charge. So. Let me tell you something Johnny come lately data must fall people. Your life with regards to internet access and ability to do many things on the go has improved immeasurably, thanks to Android (thanks Google/Alphabet), Samsung, Apple and the like. If you don't like the price of data, use the alternative. Oh, no, I forgot, that is expensive too. And the rollout has been stifled. Suddenly now we are asking for cheaper prices. They have rocketed down as a result of more users, that will continue to be the case.

If government intervenes and puts a cap on prices, expect the quality to fall away as well as any potential competition. And who knew, competition means lower prices! When you are using your Apple iPhone 12 (or some other such model) and there is only a 4G LTE connection (and you can't do anything with the phone) remember the time that you wanted something for nothing. Of course this isn't the common perception that exists, somehow the private service providers are out there to fleece you (nobody forces you to use them), whilst government are always trying to do you a favour. In fact, the opposite always ends up happening, the more government "do", the worse for the consumer in the end. So let the process take course, data will get cheaper and cheaper as you use more and more.




Linkfest, lap it up

This study doesn't sound all that scientific, it is interesting none the less - 'Trust Your Gut' Might Actually Be Profitable Advice on Wall Street, Study Says. Trading is not the only profession where people talk about trusting your gut, research seems to point to a part of the brain that is processing information that you are not even aware of.

I'm not sure how this would be regulated ? Cutting methane emissions will go a long way to slowing the increase in the globes temperature. I wonder if this will result in taxes on beef, lowering cattle count is the easiest way to reduce the methane they produce - Cow farts can now be regulated in California

Using GDP as a measure for how well a society is doing is a flawed metric. Thanks to the digital age, our living standards have improved by spending less money - Recorded music sales by format from 1973-2015, and what that might tell us about the limitations of GDP accounting




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Markets across Asia are lower. US futures are marginally lower. I for one am pleased that earnings season starts in a few weeks time in the US. Amazon is now the fourth biggest company in the US. Wow. Who would have thought? And on other matters of who would have thought, is it really the case that John Stumpf of Wells Fargo could walk away with 200 million Dollars in compensation? That is likely to make senator Warren seething mad.

Lastly, what is your heritage? Let me give you some insight to mine. Born in Zimbabwe and lived there for the first 7 years of my life, lived in South Africa (the most now), Lesotho and Mozambique. My grandfathers were born in Russia and France. My grandmothers were born in the Ukraine and Namibia, of Russian and German descent. My great grandfather was born in Corsica, does that make me sort of Italian? So that begs the question, what am I? I will tell you, a citizen of planet earth that embraces all cultures!





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Wednesday 21 September 2016

What's Janet Smellin?


"So three dissenting Fed members, rate hikes still on for the year i.e. December or an outside chance of November and the members of the FOMC downgraded the growth outlook. And stocks went up. The S&P 500 closed 1.09 percent better on the day, the Dow Industrials added nine-tenths of a percent and the nerds of NASDAQ racked up a little over a percent"




To market to market to buy a fat pig So three dissenting Fed members, rate hikes still on for the year i.e. December or an outside chance of November and the members of the FOMC downgraded the growth outlook. And stocks went up. The S&P 500 closed 1.09 percent better on the day, the Dow Industrials added nine-tenths of a percent and the nerds of NASDAQ racked up a little over a percent. Most of the action pre the Fed announcement was one of waiting and watching. If you are waiting for the Fed to do x or y or z, then I am afraid that you are doing it all wrong. The Federal Reserve in their official capacity meet every 45 days. Fed members are constantly giving speeches in public nowadays. If the only thing that you are concerned with in terms of your markets decision making process is around interest rates (I can understand if you are a fixed income person), then you are going to be confined to halls of tread carefully all of the time. You are never going to get it right.

If you are looking for the new Fed "dot-plot" then the Business Insider has it for you here -> Here's the new Fed dot plot. This is taken from the document released with the Fed announcement titled: Economic projections of Federal Reserve Board members and Federal Reserve Bank presidents under their individual assessments of projected appropriate monetary policy, September 2016. Here is that "dot-plot":



I much preferred the real one, the meme that has been doing the rounds since this document was released with the individual projections of each and every member:



Of course only the first one must be taken seriously! The second one is spot on too, nobody knows. It certainly reaffirms the view, the dot-plot of the voting members, that the long term rates are likely to be at a lower level than historical levels. That is a result of inflation having been non-existent for the last four years. And remember from that Ben Carlson piece from a couple of days back, that the US is not Japan and likely to not end up like that. The ex chief of the Fed, I mean ex chair, weighed in yesterday with his own projections of where current Japanese economic policy is heading, that is of course if you are interested: The latest from the Bank of Japan. Sounds better than your average armchair critic, right?

Over in the single companies department, Fedex added nearly seven percent on the day as numbers absolutely crushed expectations, at least on the profits front. There was a marginal top line beat too. The stock is hardly cheap and perhaps fits outside of what we would like to own, nevertheless is an important indicator of the US economy. The more stuff being shipped around, the more economic activity. I guess it shouldn't be that surprising, we had a similar "trucking" index graph that was taken from the Daily shot, two newsletters back. The company also expects a record December. Yes, the US needs to be made great again, so that this pending record Christmas can somehow "go away".

Back on the local front there was both good and bad news. Inflation numbers came in below expectations, that is good news, meaning that another rate hike is possibly unlikely in the coming meetings of the MPC. The Rand is attracting some serious inflows, perhaps the yield searchers hell bent on looking for something across the globe. Some even suggested that there was a possibility of the flow of the SABMiller money (the funds that AB InBev would use to pay for the deal) into the country. Really? Perhaps, who really knows and to be honest, trying to predict which way the currency is likely to go next is like trying to predict which way a rugby ball is likely to bounce. Hard.

The upshot of course of the Rand strengthening is that the top end of the market, which is of course the Rand hedge segment, sells off. Dollar earnings are then cut, and as Dollar earnings are cut, Rand profits are slimmer. In large part the stronger Rand is very good for the country, it reduces imported inflation and sets rates lower. For the stock market, it isn't always a great thing. Led lower by Industrial shares, that index down nearly two percent, stocks as a collective were down 1.13 percent on the day. Eish.

There is a rates decision from the local Reserve Bank today. Recent ammunition, although suggesting that we should be in the rate hiking cycle, suggests that the Monetary Policy Committee may be able to pass here. Growth is next to nothing. Inflation more importantly is below the top end of the range. Consumers may breathe a sigh of relief, we have seen that furniture and household goods in South Africa was over 8 percent lower year on year. Yech. Edcon going to the wall essentially is a bad outcome. Mr. Price looking sloppy, perhaps as a result of weather conditions. As ever, we will come though these tough times. I am expecting the question at this afternoon's MPC meeting: "Was the decision unanimous?" As Michael said, you want that to happen, you want people to not always agree.

In Europe I noted with interest that the holding company for Zara, Inditex reported numbers that were ahead of expectations. They would not be growing sales by ten percent plus if the whole of the continent was finished. The flagship store network offers quality and a reasonable price, they are neither cheap nor are they expensive. The stores look clean in design and the clothes are also clean. They seem to have the right staffers everywhere. Great business, certainly worth a look at some level.




Linkfest, lap it up

More competition is always good for the consumer. The new network will have to prove their speed and reliability, the two key reasons that consumers are switching to fiber as fast as they can - WBS to roll out national LTE-A network

WTF, is my best response to this article. Saving is difficult who ever you are - Make Six Figures? There's a Decent Chance You've Got Almost Nothing in the Bank

This points to the consumer market gaining traction in China. Property markets are wild in China at the moment - China is in the middle of a new home buying boom

Another great image from Visual Capitalist - How the World's Most Iconic Logos Evolve Over Time






Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks across the globe are higher. Thanks to central bank decisions. It might not be your favourite thing, it is what it is however. And we are likely to have an interest rate pass here today, I wonder if that means that those searching for yield or growth will determine the flows? I can't tell. Stand by!





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Bespoke going mainstream


"There is a new and uber exclusive jewellery brand named after one of the internal creative directors who was tasked with starting his own internal brand. This is a first for the majors, normally the idea is to buy and hold, famous and iconic brands from yesteryear. This is the first of the home grown brands, Giampiero Bodino is the name. This is a very exclusive brand, clients essentially have a say of what they want the bespoke pieces to look like."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Yesterday Byron said to me that I write too much about the Fed and interest rates. And that if we say that they matter little for our clients, then we should write less about them. I agree with that at some level, he is right, we possibly do fret too much about interest rates. The fact of the matter is that rates are far more important to the rest of the globe than equity markets. We will try and keep some sort of balance. Of course this coincides with the Fed decision today, tonight around 7-8 our time. The decision which has a low probability of a rate hike, although Bill Gross reckons that folks may well be caught off guard. Not sure, not going to stick my neck out, do care at some level. They must do what they must do, we will do what we will do.

Stocks across the oceans vast and far away in New York, New York, sank to the worst levels at the closing buzzer, after having traded modestly higher through the session. All the major indices ended up on the day, they were however higher until literally the last throw of the die. The wait is now on and TV screens in trading rooms around the world will be led to believe that this is more important than re-runs of Hawaii Five-0 on SABC. The original, where half the characters are dearly departed. I suck, of course the Fed decision is more important than that, and to be perfectly honest, about the only time that I watch the national broadcaster is when one of my colleagues are about to go on the box on that channel.

The biggest news at the market get-go on Wall Street was a special Senate hearing with Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf being grilled by a bunch of politicians eager for recourse. This was like finding out that your top notch uncle has been cheating at golf for some time now. Just a quick recap, thousands of employees at the bank were required to meet performance targets and as such, opened fake accounts for real clients. Once the accounts were opened, there were commissions for the employees, the customers knew little about them as they were closed pretty quickly thereafter. Unethical, right? Stumpf couldn't seem to recall the details. Funny that. Apparently it is called "unethical amnesia." The BusinessInsider has more on the matter - Here's why it seems like the CEO of Wells Fargo can't remember anything. He is not alone.

Two hours of intense grilling, a livid Senator Elizabeth Warren certainly had more than cannon fodder when she asked if the exec or senior people returned any of their compensation or took the fall, rather than the rank and file and the answer was no. She then called Stumpf a gutless leader essentially. An area president was the highest profile sacking, with so many complicated titles, it is hard to know where that sits on the "importance" level. Senator Dick Shelby asked what accountability looks like when this scandal coming to light coincides with community bank head Carrie Tolstedt departing after a multi decade career at the bank with over 100 million Dollars in compensation.

These questions are necessary, they may not seem fair and there may be a lot of political point scoring ahead of US presidential elections, the truth is that the cleanest bank on Wall Street has now been tainted. More than a few bad apples, who have been dealt with. And performance targets have been hoofed to the sidewalk. About those clawbacks? I wonder, as Byron pointed out the other day, what Warren Buffett and Berkshire think of all of this? They are after all the biggest shareholders, with 9.5 percent of the business. In time no doubt he, or the big shareholder will deal with this publicly, for now we can only guess what he thinks of these practices. I suppose if anyone know humans and their emotions then it must be the wise old oracle of Omaha. I can bet there must have been a few choice words at some stage. Oh, and on that score, a fun article on Buffett, I am not too sure how dated or how completely accurate it is, fun nonetheless - 10 Things Found In Warren Buffett's Office

On the local scene stocks had a horrible no good day. At all. As a collective they sank around a percent and a quarter. Industrials were down over a percent and a half, resources nearly the same, financials were the least bad of the lot. The Rand continued to strengthen, Rand hedges were feeling the pain. Why is the Rand strengthening? Part the eternal search for yield in a world of low rates, it feels strange with the prospects of some sort of ratings downgrade hanging over us. It is what it is, I cannot explain the flows. Equally I don't have a view on the students and their seemingly agitating closer to exam time, violence is no way to get anything done. At all times in humanity it doesn't work out. Except that we know that history is written by the victors.




I did a deep dive into Richemont yesterday. There is no doubt that the stock has been more than a little disappointing. Luxury goods across the globe have looked sloppy as fewer vacations to Europe coincide with lower purchases by foreigners, equally however since the current Chinese leadership has cut down on corruption and the culture of "gifting", there has been a slowdown in sales. Richemont as it exists nowadays is less than 30 years old. There was the tobacco element for more than half the life of the company, the cash flows were used to fund some of the acquisitions. They own some of the most prestigious and iconic luxury brands on the planet, Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels, as well as watch brands like Vacheron Constantin, Piaget, Panerai, Baume & Mercier, amongst others. They own Chloe and Lancel, Dunhill, Mont Blanc and Peter Millar, Purdey and Shanghai Tang, in a division of "other" that contributes only 16 percent of overall sales.

There is a new and uber exclusive jewellery brand named after one of the internal creative directors who was tasked with starting his own internal brand. This is a first for the majors, normally the idea is to buy and hold, famous and iconic brands from yesteryear. This is the first of the home grown brands, Giampiero Bodino is the name. This is a very exclusive brand, clients essentially have a say of what they want the bespoke pieces to look like. So, instead of buying a small part of a collection, these are truly one of a kind. Watch a short clip The ultimate bespoke jewellery by Maison Giampiero Bodino. Wearable art? Perhaps. Jewellery Maisons account for around 55 percent of all sales over at Richemont, watches just below 30 percent. Jewellery has much higher margins than watches, it is the most profitable part of the group.

So what next for luxury markets? Have we entered a time where less is more? Or are we likely as humanity to consume more of these items? Lloyd Blankfein, I was reading yesterday, wears a sports watch. Does it mean that people will replace their "I have arrived timepieces" with a wearable? Maybe. And perhaps already this is happening, Swiss data yesterday reported 14 straight months of watch sale exports, down.

Not all luxury is the same however, some of the jewellery items prices that Richemont sell across their independent brands (that is important to note) are available only on request. i.e. If you are looking for the price online then, well good for you, if you are serious, then enquire about the price. Are there likely to be more people in the world that can afford their products, or less? What does society think of the products? Do they "last" forever? They certainly do and the longer you hold them, the more valuable they become, unlike wearables which in two years will be worth nothing. I suspect we will muddle through for a little while, the next 12-18 months or so. In that time, some of the second tier family jewellery and watch makers may well become a take out target for Richemont, we loosely identified a few yesterday. Chopard and Buccellati amongst the jewellery makers, Louis Moinet and Audemars Piguet amongst the watchmakers were penciled in, no real info, just suggestions.

All luxury goods makers will be fine and continue to morph into what customers want. People want the finer things in life. They also want organic food, renewable energy, an electric vehicle and craft beer. OK, perhaps not the last one. I suspect that traditionally a cautious company, they may well get busy snapping up competitors in a time when things are a little tougher, that has been their strategy in the past. We continue to recommend holding the stock, the market is factoring in low to no growth for the time being, the share price has adjusted accordingly.




Linkfest, lap it up

We all make decisions using biases that we are normally unaware of. With the result being poor decisions being made - Cognitive Bias Codex. Being aware of these biases helps us make less of those mistakes.

Trying to regulate AirBnB sounds like a waste of resources to me. I have not seen the data that the London authorities are using but in my mind, if AirBnB has had a material impact on property prices it means that the hotel industry is not giving tourists what they want, probably cheaper rooms - London could be the next big city to crack down on Airbnb.

Sasha found this article over the weekend. It is written by someone who lived under communist rule, they highlight how inequality rose thanks to communism. There were those in power (the haves) and everyone else who couldn't improve their lives through handwork/smart investing (the have nots) - A beginner's guide to socialist economics.

As electricity becomes more expensive, having small amounts of electricity trickling away everyday due to un-used electronics starts to add up - This might explain why your electricity bill is so high




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Did you see yesterday that Edcon is now owned by the banks? Standard Bank, Barclays Africa (or is it ABSA?), FirstRand, Investec, Stand Chartered, as well as Franklin Templeton and the Harvard Pension Fund. Wow. Too much creaking debt, an economic slowdown, incorrect product mix for the times, increasing competition and a consumer that not only had choices, was also scrambling. All this meant a bad toxic cocktail and unable to service their debts, the company handed the keys over the bond holders. They are still a beast of South African retail, 1 542 stores in 9 countries, generating sales in the last financial year of 29.352 billion Rand. Truworths has annual turnover (expanded as a result of acquisitions) of 18.2 billion Rand, The Foschini Group has annual turnover of 21.1 billion Rand. See? It is big. When does it come back to market? In a bit, this is not the outcome that the banks and lenders wanted however, now they own a business.

Japanese central bankers did something that has sent the Nikkei into orbit, the index, after having been down one third or so of a percent, is up over one and two-thirds of a percent. US futures are positive, we should seen some green on the screens.





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063

Tuesday 20 September 2016

Sweat the Debt


"Last graph. It seems that there are early signs that US households are starting to borrow again, leveraging up. Contrary to popular belief, household debt to GDP has been going lower for the last 7-8 years since the financial crisis."




To market to market to buy a fat pig Stocks across the oceans and far away, in New York, New York, started better and were trading higher immediately and then someone remembered that the Fed were meeting and delivering their state of the economy mid-week. Seriously? Seriously .... There is a Barron's article that reads: Dow Gives Up Gains Because Who Wants to Be Long Before the Fed? It sounds a little like two five year old buddies not wanting to be friends anymore "I am not your friend" as a result of a lack of sharing of the plastic firetruck. Who wants to be in the business of trying to second guess the next Fed move anyhow? Not me, not us, around these parts if you "trade" and "position" yourself based on what the Fed is likely to do or say, then you are doing it all wrong.

Like all central banks, the US Federal Reserve have their specific mandate to stick to and will adjust that accordingly relative to the incoming data. They are no soothsayers either. The "dots" as that article above links to are the projections from the members themselves on where they see rates in the short term and where they see rates in the long term. What has happened is that the "Fed dot plot" has consistently been lowered over time. i.e. The action taken to raise interest rates has gotten further and further apart, not a raise now and then next meeting, and see how it goes with the incoming data from there. The suggestion is that rates are so low, thanks to the splurging in the last economic cycle and the subsequent re-adjustments of the global central banks, that raising rates too quickly could be a problem. Besides, inflation is low, the various programs that the Fed used to stimulate the economy came to an end two December's ago, more or less, remember the taper tantrum? Of course you do or don't.

In short, the smartest central bankers on the planet, handpicked and chosen by their peers and endorsed by politicians (is that a good thing?) will do whatever they have to do, in order to fulfil their mandate, the job of an investor is to see through business cycles and to pick quality stocks for the long run. And by long run, all people have their different respective time frames, two weeks is not a proper time frame, OK? Neither is two years to be honest, ten years is an acceptable time frame. Think of investing in the same way that you would living in a house. There is no way that you would chop and change houses every two weeks, or every two years. The cost and the upliftment associated with moving house, and the attached stress, is bad news for all involved. Taxes and fees are too many.

At the bell in the city built originally around the trading of animal pelts, stocks closed off their best and in the red. The broader market S&P 500 nearly managed (I think I can, I think I can), falling 0.04 points (unmoved to two decimal places in percentage terms), whilst the blue chip Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 0.02 percent at the close. Apple weighed down the nerds of NASDAQ, that index down nearly one-fifth of a percent by the close. GoPro had a product release that even I was looking forward to at some level, it included the release of a drone and a new camera. Hero5 cameras and something called the Karma drone, which folds up and fits in your backpack. It has a "console like" device that you use to control it. It looks a bit weird and will take some getting used to, I suspect that the refresh may encourage new fans to join the GoPro movement - This is GoPro's $799, foldable Karma drone. About those FAA laws ..... FAA being the Federal Aviation Authorities....

What is that you say? You want your groceries delivered by drone? Before you think that the idea is a ludicrous one and is something out of science fiction, Amazon has distribution facilities within 20 miles of 44 percent of the US population. Think about that. Around 150 million people in the US are within 20 miles from an Amazon facility that could deliver them everything from fridges to veggies. And I am guessing that Jeff Bezos, the founder of the business, wants to do it with as little human intervention as possible. The robotics age is upon us, we are close and as it evolves each day at a time, driverless cars, connected devices that can interact with us. Amazon Alexa powered through Echo, your Apple ecosystem powered by Siri. It is always a little more mind-blowing when you take a step or two back.

Back to local, which is lekker. Except we are still reeling from the loss of a music legend in a South African sense, gone too soon Mandoza. Eish. Unfortunately for the family of the departed, life just goes on as normal, it simply just rolls on and has to be that way. Stocks as a collective in Jozi rose just over one-quarter of a percent on the session, industrials slipped by one-quarter of a percent while financials added nearly a percent and one-third. SABMiller slipped as the Pound continued to weaken, as did Hammerson (a new entrant to the ALSI 40), Intu and Bidcorp, all with businesses in the UK. Call this the second round of Brexit, in which Bank of England governor (a Canadian) hopes this won't be a series of cricket test matches. And as Paul said, for a Canadian or any outsider to compare a process to test cricket, it means that it must be VERY long. In the winners column was Shoprite, which roared ahead by four and some more percent. Stronger Rand = lower inflation projections = better outlook. Make no mistake, it is still tough out there for all and sundry.




I want to take a few graphs from a magnificent daily email that I get called the Daily Shot. It is a series of graphs showing right now relative to historical. Some good, some bad as in Russian retail sales that have fallen for a couple of years now, almost every single month. There were and are a couple of graphs about the state of the US economy that I think are worth pointing out. The Daily shot is so impressive that the editor yesterday said that they were moving into the Wall Street Journal subscription area. Firstly, US truck tonnage is at an all time high.



Now correct me if I am wrong, people would not move stuff around by truck across the lengths and breadths of the US if they were feeling very bleak about the state of the US economy, right? Unless of course the railway system and the planes transporting stuff were all broken too, and I certainly have not heard anything about that, have you? The next is the Google trends graph of the search for the keyword "unemployment" inside the USA. Now, again, correct me if I was wrong, more people are likely to search for the word if someone close to them is unemployed, they are unemployed themselves or they are worried about too many unemployed people, right?



Last graph. It seems that there are early signs that US households are starting to borrow again, leveraging up. Contrary to popular belief, household debt to GDP has been going lower for the last 7-8 years since the financial crisis. There seems to be a wagging tail emerging at the end of the graph there, suggesting as the question from the Daily Shot asks "Is the US household deleveraging trend ending?"



So why would this be seen as good news? It indicates that consumers are feeling more positive by taking on more debt and it suggests that the dual mandate that the US Federal Reserve has, is eventually starting to work at some level. Draw your own conclusion, maybe I am cherry picking from the data that looks good to me, it clearly indicates that not only is the timing nearly right for the Fed, it indicates that they have done a far better job than the armchair critics dish out so easily. Like the Springbok players needing to keep their phones in their pockets and check in on the suggestions from Twitter every two seconds, the Fed needs to do the same. Thank goodness that neither party actually does that.




Linkfest, lap it up

Another great blog piece from Ben Carlson. He is talking about the investment lessons from Japan since the 70s. Most people were not following stock markets in the late 80's so don't remember the circumstances around the Japanese crash - The Greatest Bubble of All-Time?. If you thought that stocks were over valued in the mid 70's, did you just sit around watching stocks climb higher for the next 15 years?

Twitter launched their rework of the 140 character limit yesterday, so the limit is still in place but things like twitter handles and images don't count towards the limit - Coming very soon to Twitter: longer tweets

Sticking with Twitter, last week was the first time that they broadcasted a sports match live on the website - The NFL on Twitter. This is just an experiment at the moment but I expect to see more live sport matches in the future.

Still more Twitter news, the headline is fairly self explanatory - Twitter Sued by Investor for Failing to Deliver on User Growth. This sounds like a giant waste of time and money from a grumpy investor, buying equity means that you are taking on risk that the future might not look like you predict it to look.




Home again, home again, jiggety-jog. Stocks across Asia are mixed to lower, both the Shanghai composite and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong is lower on the day, only just though. The Nikkei in Japan is open again after celebrating "Respect for the Aged day" yesterday. There are 65,692 people in Japan who are 100 years or older as at the beginning of September, nearly 9 out of every ten are woman (87.6 percent to be exact). As Quartz reported yesterday: Charted: As Japan celebrates "Respect for the Aged Day," it has more seniors to honor than ever before, there are 10.5 million octogenarians (people between 80 and 89), which is more than entire population of Sweden or Portugal. About that robotics age and helping humans???? Quickly, advance humanity, advance!





Sent to you by Sasha, Byron and Michael on behalf of team Vestact.

Email us

Follow Sasha, Michael, Byron, Bright and Paul on Twitter

078 533 1063